
Parents trying to limit their kids' exposure to violent media now have a little more support -- from your kids' pediatrician. According to the American Academy of Pediatrics, "Exposure to violence in media, including television, movies, music, and video games, represents a significant risk to the health of children and adolescents."
That means that dealing with the physical and mental health problems associated by overexposure to violent media is now part of the organization's official policy. Pediatricians might now ask kids about their media lives -- like how much TV they watch, whether they have a TV in their room, what kind of video games they play, and how much time they spend consuming media. If the replies suggest too much, your pediatrician might now counsel you and your kid on creating a "safer" media environment.
Beyond that, the AAP indicates that it will promote more responsible portrayal of violence to media producers and more useful and effective media ratings. (Of course, you can always rely on ours!)
This is welcome news to many parents. In addition to acknowledging the real danger of overexposure to violent media, the AAP is fostering a shared discussion about media concerns and giving parents some parameters.
This could ease conversations with your kids' friends' parents about your family's media rules -- like what you'd prefer that your kid not play at a friend's house. It also removes some of the secrecy from a kid's media life, so kids can share something from a game or show that may have confused them but they didn't know how to talk about.
If more parents are talking about media with their doctors, more parents will talk about it with each other -- and that will help all families.
Read the quote they used "Exposure to violence in media, including television, movies, music, and video games, represents a significant risk to the health of children and adolescents." There are several things wrong with this. First off what signifacant risk to kids and teens health do they mean? You can't just declare a risk without saying what it actually risks causing. Also how do they know it's the media. There are several other things that could mess up a kid like school,home life, the kind of friends they have, the list goes on. Oh and parents do you really need somone to tell you that your 7 year old little kid should stay away from violence? While it is a complete lie that the media in any form can cause violence it should be pretty easy to figure out that kids shouldn't see violence. So really this whole new policy is a pointless waste of a childrens healthcare budget.
In response to zasios13, yes parents do need them to tell them. Parenting in this day and age has gone downhill in a lot of homes. Parents are too worried about being their kids friends instead of their parents. The amount of time kids spend with their parents compared to the amount of time they spend immersed in various forms of media is pathetic. The fact is parents have turned over their duties to the media, from computers to cell phones, to those annoying DVD players in the back seats of their SUV's. We are too busy, too selfish, or too scared to parent and we look for media to step in and babysit. From the day we are born we become influenced by our environment. A child doesn't grow up in an English speaking home and then suddenly begin to speak French. We are very much like sponges and we absorb so much of what we see and hear. That's why so many teenagers wear their pants down to their knees even though they can barely walk without tripping. Thats why older generations wore bell bottoms and big hair do's. They were influenced by popular culture. To say there isn't any influence is just denial in my opinion. We are always influenced, some clearly more than others due to other factors When that exposure is negative, crude, and violent just for the sake of violence, the influence can have negative results. This site does list the results- lack of empathy, desensitization, anxiety, and aggressive behaviors. Oh, and yes, it is obvious that other factors contribute to violence like you mentioned. Still, should we throw kerosene on the fire?
I applaud the AAP for taking on media violence and I wish they would also take on explicit/no boundry sexuality in the media. It's difficult for some to believe that there are children with little or no parental guidance--but there are. As a volunteer in public schools, I've seen plenty of children who show no evidence that a parent or guardian has either checked their backpack or helped with homework--for weeks! Even more frustrating is that of those parents who are involved in their children's lives, many have a misguided understanding of what is appropriate for their child. More than two thirds of the parents I know have allowed their children to watch and play media rated "T" or "PG-13", from as early as age 6 and up! What are these kids going to watch and play when they finally become a teenager--"M", or "R"? To compound the issue, standards for rating settings seem to drop lower and lower. Our doctors lecture us when we're taking in too many calories and getting thick in the middle, why shouldn't they also lecture us when were taking in too much violent media?
I'm ticked off, I'm tired of this. Where the hell are they collecting this information? "Exposure to violence in media, including television, movies, music, and video games, represents a significant risk to the health of children and adolescents.", what bull is that? I could understand children being affected, and I mean CHILDREN, as in less than about 10-12 years of age, but teenagers? No. Why do people think that "minors" are completely incapable of distinguishing fantasy from reality? The fact itself is shoved down our throats so often that its almost impossible not to know the difference To me, someone who has never played a video game in his/her life, then plays a game later on (around teen or later years) is going to have a harder time distinguishing reality from fantasy than a kid who has been playing games from a young age, up into their teens, because they already know whats the difference after years of playing (and hopefully, their parents have been informing them of what is real and what is fake, but that doesn't mean they censor everything, they just explain what their children are seeing). If I ever go to a pediatrician and he or she starts telling me to stop playing games because its "harming" me in his/her opinion, I'll just laugh and walk away, because ironically, games have helped me develop not only my talents in the real world, but friendships with people at school. Apparently they seem to think bad teachers, the school faculty, horrible school conditions, bullies, over-working on homework, stress in class, gangs formed by people WHO DON'T EVEN PLAY VIDEO GAMES, are not factors in anger or violence between students, oh no, of course not. Its totally all violent media and entertainment now. Schools are totally perfect places where teens and kids are not affected mentally at all (major sarcasm just in case you couldn't detect it). If you are a teen, I highly encourage you to stand against this (peacefully, mind you, peaceful protests tend to make the biggest dents in our enemies) do everything you can to fight for your freedom without violence. Teenage years are the last years of childhood, and you should not have those years taken away from you by your parents or these so called experts. Enjoy your youth for every second you have of it, because once you hit your adult years, your free time begins to drain, and life comes crashing down on you. Life goes by too fast to worry about these silly things. (Not to say adult years are completely boring, though, just that childhood is something I wish I could hold on to forever)
@ Mr. Hundert
I can understand that violent media initiates these responses in most people, but most people can move on in life without being "damaged" by it. Say for example, when I saw a video that was circulated around the internet about a woman who was shot in Iran during the protests not too long ago, I couldn't even get halfway through it without feeling sick from the bloody, real footage, and turning it off, feeling disturbed and disgusted. And to say that we don't live in a dangerous world isn't true. Maybe a safe neighborhood, but around the world, no. Assuming we are would be like ignoring the problems of piracy, crime, and war across the world. Perhaps I was a bit upset about this decision at first, I could totally understand younger age groups needing close monitoring when exposed to media (I thought I mentioned this?). I totally understand video games are just toys, nothing more. I'm just a bit upset, because this decision is going to make some parents think that their teens are automatically going to have problems if they are exposed to violent games. I should specify that I'm "half" content with their decision then.
Its because media is exposing different kinds of crimes and violence even to younger kids. A recent study was done to see if there was a correlation between neighborhood violence in areas with payday lending. It was done with cooperation between George Washington and Nor Cal University, and they used Seattle, Washington, as their model. They found that areas with payday lending did have higher rates/incidents of violence. However, they failed to mention this gem: Areas with higher poverty (poverty increases demand for payday lending) have higher areas of violence – universally. (History has proven it time and again, and will continue to.) Correlation does not imply causality, in other words; to insist it does is a logical fallacy. Instead of blaming payday lending, they should blame the conditions that created payday loan demand – like poverty.
Well, I play "Attack of the Mutant Cannibalistic Baby Rapists: Part 9" all the time, and I've never raped a mutant cannibalistic baby...
I think that this issue of violence in the media (whether in games for teens, young children, or tv shows and movies) is one that many parents grapple with. There are so many voices on each side of the debate that it is difficult to make a decision and stick with it when it comes to what is okay for your kids.
Common Sense Media helps with their more detailed ratings, but it is ultimately an individual choice that each parent/family must make. But as these issues become more and more mainstream, hopefully there will be a more open discussion about what is important, rather than a heated debate along ideological lines.
Trust your instincts as a parent. If a show, movie, or game makes you uncomfortable, there is probably a good reason. As long as you take the time to consider it carefully, trust your gut reaction.
wow. it is great ! thank you for sharing!
In response to "FREEDOMFROMCENSORSHIP", they gather it from medical/social research and effects on the human brain. When you watch something, there is a physical reaction in your body. No one can deny this. Watching a horror or action movie has a very direct effect on your blood pressure, your heart rate etc. Your body actually can move into the stress response of "fight or flight". When you watch a sad or inspirational movie, people can be moved to tears. Now, we all consciously know that the movie is not "real" but our body still unconsciously responds as if it were real. Pediatricians are not stepping on your freedoms. They are looking into a major part of child and teen culture that can be damaging if not monitored carefully. I work with children on a daily basis and one survey I conducted showed that almost 80% of the kids felt that the world was a DANGEROUS place with moments of Safety as opposed to a SAFE place with moments of danger. This is sad to me. These are children who live in a very safe, upscale neighborhood. What we see CAN affect how we view and see the world. It may not make us go out a shoot somebody but it can desensitize us and make us feel helpless. This contributes directly to their experience of the world. Unfortunately, most of the media today targets them to buy something or it hooks them in with crude or violent behavior. These affects social norms, civility, and manners. This is all new territory and we should proceed with caution. They are surrounded by more media than any other generation. They are constantly on, constantly connected to something electronic and they seem to panic or get very defensive if these "toys" are monitored or taken away. This is the true sign of addiction. Take it away and see the reaction. Keep in mind, your freedom or life isn't being taken away, it is a video game, just a toy. Yet the response makes it seems like they are being deprived of oxygen. No wonder we have some of the unhappiest kids in the world. No wonder we have so many teens, college age students and young adults on anti anxiety medication. I respectfully disagree
with "FREEDOMFROMCENSORSHIP" 's response and applaud the efforts of the American Academy of Pediatrics. It is about time we looked at what we are doing to our kids.