About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

A safe community is important to us.
Please observe our guidelines.

All teen and kid reviews for 28 Weeks Later

Age
12
Average rating based on 17 kid and teen reviews:
  • 53% say violence is an issue
Teen, 17 years old
July 11, 2009
 
Very scary and graphic violence. not for easily disturbed.
Extremely Gorey and Disturbing so not for under 12. I loved it though.

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 13 years old
June 24, 2011
 
NEVER SAW IITT
NEVER SAW ITTTTT

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 14 years old
April 2, 2011
 
Not a bad sequel, with positive role models, kinda bloody...
With plot I thought it was one of the better sequels out there. With positive messages I think it had good two role models the main male and female military agents trying to save a kid even though it is against their orders, risking and losing their life to save the kids. Negative, it was a bit more bloody but then again it is a zombie movie so it's exactly what you expect.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 15 years old
August 14, 2010
 

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 14 years old
July 18, 2010
 
Graphic says it all
I liked it, but not quite as good as 28 days later. Definetely NOT for anyone who is in the least bit squeamish. Expect graphic, gory violence and strong language. I would rate it R for strong graphic violence and gore, language, disturbing content and brief sexuality/nudity.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
April 9, 2008
 
Pretty good
First off, I have to disagree with the man claiming movies like this are responsible for acts of violence. Movies/Games arent the cause, its dumb parents who dont teach their children right from wrong. Let me also add that there was violence WAY before technology. As for the movie, its still the same concept we all know and love. I thought it was good, it just didnt induce the same type of fear/isolation that the first one achieved so greatly.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
December 26, 2009
 
Bloody, sad, but a perfect Zombie film
I liked this movie a lot, a lot better than its prequel. But I do wish that they had gone a little deeper into the whole eye color thing, that would have been cool. If I had any kids, I would not let them see this until they were at least 16, it is that violent. There is a scene where the government decides just to kill everyone, and it is very.....err.......emotional?

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
June 21, 2009
 
SCARY OR WHAT?
hmm, i think this and the SAW sequell beats all horrors! ermm, i wouldent say for people under my age, the most scariest movie i have ever seen! 17+

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 16 years old
April 16, 2009
 
SCARY!
I usually like horror films but this is too frightening. It's very disturbing!

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 16 years old
April 9, 2008
 
A GREAT SEQUEL TO AN AWESOME MOVIE!
This film takes place 28 weeks after an infection started, and nearly wiped out all of England. London is rebuilding, but the virus is back and a boy and girl might have the cure.

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 13 years old
August 19, 2009
 
Very, Very Scary and Graphic
it scared the crap out of me

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
June 7, 2009
 
Don't watch this If you get freaked out by zombies!
If you get scared by zombies I wouldnt watch this but apart form that one of the best zombie/death/scary movies I have ever seen :)

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 18 years old
April 9, 2008
 
I was So Scared
Im 13 and i thought this movie was great!!!MUST SEE.There is barely any nudity and a little bit of violence.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 18 years old
April 9, 2008
 
Good but not great
youcould not feel the same connection between characters like in first film

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 18 years old
April 9, 2008
 
an amezing and terrifying film
Okay so this is the sequel to 28 days later (it should be obious) and the only thing I have to say it is absolutely amazing, and for you guys that may like scary movies this won't dissapoit you, but beware this film is very gory and very scary.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
April 9, 2008
 
ok, yeah there's swearing but if i was being attacked by these kind of people I would be swearing but for the most part its not a big deal. And as for the "couple getting ready to drink liqur" it's a bottle of fricken wine, people drink that all of the time. I Think this movie is fine for ages 12 and up but only because its gorey and scary.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 13 years old
February 13, 2012
 
28 Weeks Later
The very violent sequel to 28 Days Later sees the virus spreading across Britian.Although I liked this,I can't say how much I preferred 28 Days Later to this.It really needed that little feeling of hopelessness and reality that 28 Days so greatly managed to achieve.It cranks up the gore and scares of the original though.The most violent part is when Don kills Alice in the hospital after kissing her and getting the infected saliva,becoming crazy and proceeding to bite and gouge out his wife's eyes and blood pours out profusely.The room is covered in blood after this and he gets shot later in the head in a huge resultant blood explosion.Also the part where the guy hangs on the helicopter and the zombies chase him,looking like crazed fans cheering for some famous rock band and the helicopter slices the zombies heads off with blood going everywhere ,not before the guy falls down and gets eaten.Go check IMDB Parents Guide or Kidsinmind for more information.Can't wait for 28 Months Later to come !What do you guys think it will be about?More zombie killings,of course. Kill zombies,that's what I say!

Flag as inappropriate