Blood Work (R)

Disappointing, predictable, and graphic.

(Flash is loading. If this text does not disappear you need to install the latest flash version)

Common Sense rates it
2
Seen the movie? Review it
392.jpg
Movie details
  • Studio: Warner Bros.
  • Directed By: Clint Eastwood
  • Cast: Jeff Daniels, Clint Eastwood
  • Running Time: 115 minutes
  • Release Date: 08/09/2002
  • Video/DVD Release Date: 12/27/2002
  • Genre: Action/adventure
  • MPAA Rating: R
  • MPAA Explanation: violence, language, and brief sexual situations

Parents need to know

Parents need to know that this film has some strong language as well as some graphic images (mostly on videotape) of people getting shot. There is also some offscreen sex, and the happening and recovery of the heart attack are well documented.

Families can talk about whether McCaleb felt the need to catch the killer because the murdered woman's heart saved his life or because he cared about the woman and her nephew.

Message

Social Behavior:

Fairly diverse cast, including strong black and Hispanic main characters

Consumerism:

Drugs/Alcohol/Tobacco:

None

Violence

Several shootings, a heart attack

Sex

Mild sexual situation

Language

Fairly strong language

Common Sense says

What's the story?

Reviewed by Nell Minow

In BLOOD WORK, Clint Eastwood stars as Terry McCaleb, a veteran FBI profiler. On the verge of capturing a taunting murderer, McCaleb suffers a heart attack and is forced into retirement. Two years later he is slowly recovering from a heart transplant when he is visited by the sister of the woman whose heart now beats in McCaleb's body. Her sister's murderer is still on the loose, and she wants McCaleb on the case. He reluctantly agrees and is soon finding clues, with a little help from his lazy fishing neighbor (Jeff Daniels). McCaleb disobeys doctor's warnings and dodges bumbling fellow officers to carry out his case, also becoming close to the woman (Wanda DeJesus) and her nephew (Mason Lucero).

Is it any good?

2
The presence of a Hollywood icon as an actor and director cannot overcome Blood Work's predictable script. The trouble with this film is that the believable parts are unsurprising and the surprising parts are unbelievable. Eastwood's presence hasn't diminished one bit over the years and his storytelling skills still shine, and Daniels also does a very good job, but the movie is simply never too interesting to anyone who's seen this kind of film before, especially after they've been done so well in Manhunter and The Silence of the Lambs.

The film's climax is probably the most interesting part, but it's hard to believe that the McCaleb, who was so perceptive in the film's first half, wouldn't have figured out the killer and his/her motive much sooner, which seemed obvious to much of the audience.

Other choices

Support Common Sense Media
Common Sense Media is a non-profit and will receive a portion of your purchase from Pricegrabber. Learn more.

Parents and kids say

Be the first to post a review.

Log in or Register to post a review
Review It

Great Fantasy Books for Harry Potter Fans

Great Fantasy Books for Harry Potter Fans
Which fantasy book creature has the best name?
Fluffy (3-headed dog, Harry Potter)
43%
Mister Grin (giant crocodile, Peter and the Starcatchers)
29%
Vermicious Knid (shapeshifting monster, Charlie and the Great Glass Elevator)
0%
The Incredibly Deadly Viper (harmless snake, Series of Unfortunate Events)
0%
Bunnicula (vampire bunny, Bunnicula series)
29%
7 votes