The Exorcist (R)

Trendsetting shocker about a possessed child.

(Flash is loading. If this text does not disappear you need to install the latest flash version)

Common Sense rates it
4
Seen the movie? Review it
5591_orig.jpg
Movie details
  • Studio: Warner Home Video
  • Directed By: William Friedkin
  • Cast: Ellen Burstyn, Max von Sydow, Linda Blair
  • Running Time: 132 minutes
  • Release Date: 12/26/1973
  • Video/DVD Release Date: 03/26/1997
  • Genre: Horror
  • MPAA Rating: R
  • MPAA Explanation: horror elements, violence, profanity and intensity.

Parents need to know

Parents need to know that this is a mature horror film, not aimed at (or paced for) kids. No rock-music soundtracks or look-out-the-killer-is-behind-you scares, but rather an awful sense of corruption as demonic possession takes over an adolescent girl like a loathsome progressive disease. The infamous makeup effects of projectile vomiting and blood, blaspheming, and gutturally obscene language were meant to disturb the viewer as nothing before seen in movies, and they still convey solid shocks.

Families can talk about the film's religious and scientific overtones. Does Father Karras regain his religious faith in the finale, and how does he become almost Christlike? What do you think about the novel's suggestion that this might not be a "real" demon but rather some terrible but explicable mental disorder?

Message

Social Behavior:

Technically the plot is about the redemption of the doubting Father Karras, who sacrifices himself to save a life, but it's the sense of evil in the film that stays with you. The "good" characters seem bewildered and powerless. Regan's mother refuses to even tell the girl's father what's been happening.

Consumerism:

Soft-drink signs, movie-company logos.

Drugs/Alcohol/Tobacco:

Social imbibing, and a character is drunk at a party. Mention of pills and pot.

Violence

The demonic Regan punches her mother and other investigators and (offscreen) brutally murders a man. She also mutilates herself, vomits blood, and in a famous moment, rotates her own head completely around. Another character falls fatally out a window and down a flight of steps.

Sex

Nothing seductive or titillating, but still intense, as the possessed girl lewdly propositions men, talks about oral sex, and is briefly shown rubbing a crucifix in her groin.

Language

A little girl taken over by the devil doesn't hold back much in the cursing department.

Common Sense says

What's the story?

Reviewed by Charles Cassady, Jr.

Linda Blair plays Regan MacNeil, the bright 12-year-old daughter of successful actress Chris (Ellen Burstyn), who can afford to raise the girl in a nurturing atmosphere with live-in cooks and nannies (Regan's absentee father is written off as self-absorbed and oblivious). The first signs of trouble include Regan playing with a Ouija board and claiming she's communicated with a ghost she calls Captain Howdy. Then the girl begins behaving abnormally, urinating in front of party guests and foretelling death for Chris' film-director boyfriend. While Regan suffers grueling medical exams and gets progressively worse, the story line simultaneously follows Father Damien Karras (Jason Miller), a Greek-American Catholic priest with some doubts about his religion. When medical science fails to cure the howling, obscenity-spewing, uncontrollable Regan, doctors point Chris to Father Karras, whose background in psychology includes the now-rare rite of exorcism. Karras summons another priest to help, the wiser and older Father Merrin (Max Von Sydow), and together they begin to do battle with Regan's occupier.

Is it any good?

4
Thanks in part to Linda Blair's wrenching, Oscar-nominated performance, The Exorcist was a huge hit, earning back 10 times its $10 million budget (a then-lavish sum, outrageous for a "mere" horror flick). Movie historians cite it (along with The Texas Chainsaw Massacre) as the conclusive end of old-school spook shows featuring Dracula and Frankenstein and bobbing rubber bats. If you think your teen is ready for this shocking film, keep in mind that audience members in the '70s reportedly fainted and, in some extreme cases, required psychiatric care after seeing Dick Smith's grisly makeup effects on Blair and director William Friedkin's matter-of-fact way of presenting them. Also, the moans, snarls, and profane utterances from Regan (most are actually the dubbed-in voice of a well-known older actress, Mercedes McCambridge) amount to some of the most chilling audio ever done for film.

Other choices

Rosemary's Baby

Diary of a City Priest
Support Common Sense Media
Common Sense Media is a non-profit and will receive a portion of your purchase from Pricegrabber. Learn more.

Parents and kids say

All Reviews

There are 10 reviews.

3


Posted on 07/05/08 by wumb Kid contributor, age 9

that movie scared me to death!

this movie is the most scary movie i have ever seen!
5

Posted on 05/26/08 by Anonymous Kid contributor, age 12

very scary

The first time I saw this movie, I got extremely scared. For it's time, this movie is very scary, and still is now. It is also very good, and I recommend it for anyone over the age of 17.
5

Posted on 05/23/08 by Anonymous Adult contributor
5


Posted on 02/27/08 by ImBored25 Kid contributor, age 14

Not Scary...

This movie isnt scary at all. The cussing is so-so. Not that much violence. There are worse movies out there. I could watch this movie in a dark room and not be scared. She just looks like a halloween costume. I mean come on, i heard people fainted in the 70's when they saw this. Oh well, see it if your 13+
5


Posted on 01/02/08 by southparkfan15 Adult contributor

A great (yet disturbing) movie!

This movie is NOT I repeat NOT a movie or kids. There is a scene with a masturbation with a crucifix and much more. Not for the weak stomached people.
4


Posted on 08/05/07 by plaah Kid contributor, age 13

This movie was ok, but if you cant take swearing scary images or take your religion seriously stay away. That's the reason its rated R for petes sake. And It wasnt even scary. Might have been scary in '73, not so much now compared to other movies. I've seen adults get scared of this I thought it was funny.
3

Posted on 06/03/07 by Anonymous Kid contributor, age 13

okay

slow paced movie w/ some thriller parts but overall not scary
5


Posted on 04/29/07 by dklink Kid contributor, age 12

good for about 12+

great movie. lots of disturbing images. (lots of vomit) tons of swear words for the era it was made.
4


Posted on 02/26/07 by digitex30189 Adult contributor
4


Posted on 01/14/07 by tvdirector Adult contributor

The Scariest Film of All Time

Words can't describe this film . . . nearly 35 years later, it's power to terrify remains. Parents beware . . . this is NOT for children . . . and I've said this before about other films I've reviewed. If any film in the last 40 years of the ratings system has demonstrated the need for an adults only classification for something other than porn, this is it. It's a powerful work . . . but not for kids.

See all 10 reviews >

Adult Reviews

There are 4 reviews.

5

Posted on 05/23/08 by Anonymous Adult contributor
5


Posted on 01/02/08 by southparkfan15 Adult contributor

A great (yet disturbing) movie!

This movie is NOT I repeat NOT a movie or kids. There is a scene with a masturbation with a crucifix and much more. Not for the weak stomached people.
4


Posted on 02/26/07 by digitex30189 Adult contributor
4


Posted on 01/14/07 by tvdirector Adult contributor

The Scariest Film of All Time

Words can't describe this film . . . nearly 35 years later, it's power to terrify remains. Parents beware . . . this is NOT for children . . . and I've said this before about other films I've reviewed. If any film in the last 40 years of the ratings system has demonstrated the need for an adults only classification for something other than porn, this is it. It's a powerful work . . . but not for kids.

Kids Reviews

There are 6 reviews.

3


Posted on 07/05/08 by wumb Kid contributor, age 9

that movie scared me to death!

this movie is the most scary movie i have ever seen!
5

Posted on 05/26/08 by Anonymous Kid contributor, age 12

very scary

The first time I saw this movie, I got extremely scared. For it's time, this movie is very scary, and still is now. It is also very good, and I recommend it for anyone over the age of 17.
5


Posted on 02/27/08 by ImBored25 Kid contributor, age 14

Not Scary...

This movie isnt scary at all. The cussing is so-so. Not that much violence. There are worse movies out there. I could watch this movie in a dark room and not be scared. She just looks like a halloween costume. I mean come on, i heard people fainted in the 70's when they saw this. Oh well, see it if your 13+
4


Posted on 08/05/07 by plaah Kid contributor, age 13

This movie was ok, but if you cant take swearing scary images or take your religion seriously stay away. That's the reason its rated R for petes sake. And It wasnt even scary. Might have been scary in '73, not so much now compared to other movies. I've seen adults get scared of this I thought it was funny.
3

Posted on 06/03/07 by Anonymous Kid contributor, age 13

okay

slow paced movie w/ some thriller parts but overall not scary
5


Posted on 04/29/07 by dklink Kid contributor, age 12

good for about 12+

great movie. lots of disturbing images. (lots of vomit) tons of swear words for the era it was made.
Review It

Great Fantasy Books for Harry Potter Fans

Great Fantasy Books for Harry Potter Fans
Which fantasy book creature has the best name?
Fluffy (3-headed dog, Harry Potter)
50%
Mister Grin (giant crocodile, Peter and the Starcatchers)
0%
Vermicious Knid (shapeshifting monster, Charlie and the Great Glass Elevator)
0%
The Incredibly Deadly Viper (harmless snake, Series of Unfortunate Events)
0%
Bunnicula (vampire bunny, Bunnicula series)
50%
2 votes