About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

A safe community is important to us.
Please observe our guidelines.

All parent reviews for Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel

Age
5
Average rating based on 67 parent reviews:
  • 39% say there are positive messages
Parent
April 21, 2010
 

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 6 year old
May 21, 2010
 
NO A TEACHING TOOL!!!
Our 5 year old saw this movie at school, yes public kindergarten. We were shocked to hear it was to teach them about bulling and teaseing. Yes it taught them how to do it!!!

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
December 28, 2009
 
The true meaning of CRAP
Watching this film was: a. painful b. make you appreciatate the creativity, hard-work, and good film-making for films like Up, Wall-E, Ice-Age, etc. This was horrible. No redeeming values for anyone. My kids will forget about this in less than 24 hours, and keep talking about good movies like Up. Don't waste your time. Buy a good DVD and stay at home.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 6 year old
January 24, 2010
 
Not great, but not bad
Our daughter just turned 5, and every movie we've seen since she was born (including DVDs) we've seen as a family. I enjoyed this movie, and our daughter did within her limitations. Those limitations are that a feature-length film in one sitting is still a stretch for her, and she scares easier than many kids. At one point the Chipmunk character is threatened with mortal danger from a large predator--a teachable moment about movies and make-believe. Some of the main characters act in less-than-desirable manners during part of the movie, but they and the audience see the error of their ways by the end of the movie. In the end, I'd take the three of us again.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 10 and 12 year old
January 19, 2010
 
Sadly, An Average Film
Common Sense's reviewer, though mostly spot on about lessons learned, disappointed me in not mentioning what has become almost set in stone devices that every kid's movie has to have: someone getting an injury to the groin and at least one meaningless but blatant fart-joke. Why does a movie aimed at six years old have a ground level shot of a man lying on the ground with legs spread wide and a powerful motorcycle running into his crotch? I just don't understand the purpose of Theodore crawling under the covers with Toby and being gassed in his face? Other than appealing to the lcd of both kids and adults, why display such behavior? The product placements were shameful as well. As far as I'm concerned, I don't care what is in films aimed at adults; do away with censorship and let the market decide. When it comes to kid's movies however, there should either be none allowed (not likely), or require a full disclaimer in all advertising (not likely either). Product placements aimed at children are a perfect example of corporate corruption accepted as an expected everyday event when it should be vilified and condemned. As parents my wife and I teach our kids to be skeptical of all commercials and to recognize product placements as the commercials they are. All in all, when the description "…Only a few crude jokes…" is given as praise for a film aimed at this age group, I am saddened.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent
March 26, 2010
 
Noisy garbage pretending to be "cute". Ugh!
Hated it! Since when are the Chipmunks in HIGH SCHOOL?! And why? They're chipmunks. Couldn't they be entering school for the first time? Attending a new school and all that goes with that? But high school? Just an excuse for LOUD music and the continued glorification of the 14-17 year old. Sure the "message" is Be Yourself...but the big "laughs", energy and focus go to just the opposite. After a rowdy "rap" song opening Dave is injured so badly that he ends up in the hospital, in traction....in the first 8 minutes of the film. Then we watch Granny slowly roll backwards down a staircase in a wheelchair--all while looking horrified. My kids were scared. What was the purpose? Why do the "Chippettes" (clever, huh?) need to be so suggestive? They're cartoons? Is this how far we've come? Girls are singularly "flirty", desperate for attention and in need of a boy for rescue? Product placements galore, scary images of swooping eagles, references to pole dancing, an unnecessarily loud soundtrack and the celebration of snotty teens--who needs it? I wouldn't waste my children's time or my $ on this kind of junk food.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 11 and 13 year old
July 12, 2010
 
Funny family movie - geared more to tweens/teens
This is a good, funny, family movie, but I rated it 6 years and above because much of it will be over a child's head if younger. In fact, this seemed more geared to tweens and teens in my opinion. The meanness of the talent agent when he locks the chipmunks in cages may upset younger ones, but the scene recovers in humor. Overall, good movie for the family to see.

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
April 18, 2010
 
You know what really pains me?
The fact that so many parents chose this, a poorly written, contrived cash grab over a well-written film, aka, The Princess and the Frog, and it's all thanks to this that Disney has changed the title of Rapunzel to Tangled and changed the main characters around while also taking away some of the serious nature it was originally supposed to have. Thanks, parents, thank you for making that happen. Now that the rant's out of the way, I must apologize. I don't normally take my frustration out on the audience as the writing staff play a bigger part in it. It just really saddens me that good companies have thrown away their talent in favor of mind-rotting bulltripe simply because movies like this do better at the box office. This is just showing how sad mankind has gotten. Now what can I say about the Squeakquel? Well, while I did find it a little better than the first one, it's still stupid beyond all belief. I still can't get over how they portray Simon in these movies. In the show, he could actually show us that he was smart. In the movies... okay, he uses big words, but that's about it. Other than that, he makes just as dumb of decisions as everyone else. They also took away everything that could have made Theodore likable as if having a personality would have made him less cute! Here's a message, parents: No sane person who watched these two would possibly think the upcoming Chipmunks 3D will be any good! We know it's only going to be a visual film and not a story-driven one! Pixar is releasing Toy Story 3 around that time! Take your kids to that instead and maybe Disney will be convinced not to cancel their upcoming King of Elves project like they've been rumored to be thinking of.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 7 year old
June 3, 2010
 
Our family loves this movie. The only problem I have is the selection of song "All the Single Ladies" by Beyonce. I think there could have been a thousand songs for them to sing. Now my 6 year old wants to hear that song all of the time and has no idea what it means. Would have been better to pick a song that was more age appropriate for little boys and girls.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 5, 8, 10, 12, and 17 year old
July 12, 2010
 
good for kids 6-9
the music is great. easy for little people to follow the silly story line.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 6 and 8 year old
April 26, 2010
 
Not a great movie, but safe for those 10+
I felt there was too much boy/girl stuff for my 4 and 6 year old. I also don't appreciate them using "catchy" little sayings like "shake what your mama gave you" that are just begging kids to repeat long after they have left the theater. Nevermind that the move was awful and not very entertaining.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 14 year old
September 11, 2010
 
Alvin!!!!
Not as good as the first film.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 15 year old
August 18, 2010
 

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
July 20, 2010
 
nothing wrong with this movie just more laughs than the first one

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 2 and 5 year old
July 7, 2010
 
i love it for my kids

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 6 and 8 year old
January 5, 2010
 
Don't waste your money!!!
Since when did the chipmunks become entertainment for snarky teenagers? While the supposed messages are "like yourself for who you are" and "don't succumb to peer pressure", the opposite of those messages were made to seem much more cool and more entertaining. I could go on and on about how the good messages were trumped by the bad, but setting that aside, the movie was simply boring and unfunny. My children (ages 5 & 7) made it through the entire movie without laughing once, and afterward had little positive to say about it. It was just bad.

Flag as inappropriate 
Educator and Parent of 26, 26, 26, 27, 27, and 27 year old
December 21, 2009
 
Perfect for all ages
I realize that this is indicated for under 10 but I guess that I am child under 10 because this is one of my favorite shows of the the season. The Chipmunks have out done themselves again-even if is a new cast they have done a great job.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 9 year old
January 6, 2010
 
The worst of modern kids fare. I don't mind the fart jokes and whatnot - all kids find that funny. The Entourage "hug it out referenes", pole dancing quips and wholesale lifting of the fava beans and Chianti lines from Silence of the Lambs? It all adds up to some sloppy, puerile "grown up" references to keep the parents from gouging out their eyes while watching the same "be yourself" and "stay true to friends and family" hokum that characterizes most children's entertainment today. Worst of the worst from my standpoint. Naturally, my children loved it.

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
January 2, 2010
 
Substitutes overly mature content for creativity
Fart jokes, eyelash batting, females dependent on male rescue, so many annoying aspects to this movie. Music selections way too adult for this group. Practically speaking, how do you take a six year old to the movie and not the 4 year old brother? Would have been equally decent (can't say good) without the overly adult elements.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 10, 13, and 15 year old
December 29, 2009
 
Whole family enjoyed it
I wasn't looking forward to 2 hours of squeaking, but my husband and I enjoyed it much more then I thought we would. My kids were thoroughly entertained and my 8 year old absolutely loved it. I don't know if they get any of the positive messages about not having to be the popular ones or that type, but it was certainly entertaining for them. Some fart humor, but they love that too.

Flag as inappropriate