Captivity

  • Review Date: October 29, 2007
  • R
  • Genre: Horror
  • 2007
 Review

Common Sense Media says

Dreary, cliched "torture porn." Yuck.
greenON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
yellowPAUSE: Know your child; some content
may not be right for some kids.
redOFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
not for kidsNOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids any age.

Find out more

Quality
 
Sometimes media can be age appropriate but a real waste of time. Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Parents say

Kids say

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that this bloody, torturous (literally and figuratively) horror movie is in no way for kids. Brutal, grisly images -- focused on the kidnapping, captivity, and torture of a model by a killer who resents her "beauty" (and has flashbacks to a sexually abusive mother) -- are nonstop. Expect to see shooting, stabbing, smothering by sand, bondage, hitting, and teeth pulling by pliers. The model is forced to wear skimpy clothing, swallow blended human entrails, and take needles of knockout drugs in her arm. There's one brief but suggestive sex scene; and, in addition to doping his victim, the killer drinks several times while observing her. Language includes repeated uses of "f--k" and more.

  • Model seems arrogant and shallow -- but also self-knowing -- in her interviews; kidnapper is inexorably sadistic and brutal.
  • Unrelenting violence and/or threat of violence. Repeated images of bloody wounds and body parts (in one especially gruesome scene, a victim is force-fed bloody, blendered body parts, including an eyeball shown in close-up, until she passes out). Violent acts include acid funneled through a tube (which causes the victim to explode), pouring acid onto a victim so her face burns, dragging and tying up an unconscious woman, a victim screaming and throwing furniture, a victim strapped to a chair and forced to watch another victim showered by acid, threatening displays of "Hanging Man" tarot card and a bloody doll, confinement in a glass box filling with sand, shooting victim's dog in front of her, flashback of a young boy stabbing his mother repeatedly in the stomach, pulling teeth with pliers (very bloody mouth), stabbing, shooting with shotgun (in a couple of scenes), smashing with bat, and spraying poisonous cleaner in face.
  • Model images show sexy poses (cleavage and breast, no nipple); kidnapped model wears revealing and (in one blurry profile image) no clothing; flashback shows substance-addled mother lying on bed telling her young son that "It makes Mommy feel so good" when "Mommy touches you" sex scene late in the film shows male on top, thrusting (not explicit, but disturbing, as the scene is observed by kidnapper on surveillance monitor); creepy discussion of being "inside her" suggestion of an incestuous relationship between two brothers; suggestions of sex in kidnapper's scrapbooks.
  • Plenty of nasty language to enhance the ugly imagery, including "f--k," "damn," "s--t," "a--hole," "bastard," and "piece of crap."
  • The model is herself a brand in the movie; Palm Pilot is mentioned.
  • Jennifer has a drugged drink at a club (the image warps to approximate her perspective); kidnapper drinks wine several times; Jennifer is drugged (by needle) and passes out while in captivity; kidnapper's mother appears in flashback, extremely high and discussing her sexual abuse of her son; cigarette butts appear in ashtray.

What's the story?

Reportedly re-edited to enhance gore and all but disowned by director Roland Joffé (whose previous work includes The Killing Fields), Captivity is premised on one tedious idea: torturing a beautiful girl. From her first minute on screen, model Jennifer Tree (Elisha Cuthbert) is objectified. Kidnapped by an apparently devious stalker who drugs her drink and then drags her out a back door , Jennifer wakes up in a basement. She will spend several days being emotionally and physically abused by the stalker (Pruitt Taylor Vince), who lurks in shadows, watches her on surveillance monitors, and wears an ominous dark hoodie. Jennifer's torments are various; most have to do with nasty restraints and ocular tricks (a window looking out on palm trees and water turns out to be a cruel projection). Distraught, Jennifer cries out repeatedly, "I'm sorry" (thus mimicking the tape the killer shows her of a previous victim crying out as she's doused with acid).


Is it any good?

 

Even before its release, CAPTIVITY was notorious. Shot in Moscow in 2005, it was touted as the first United States-Russian co-production. And its early ads -- which featured images of a young woman's abuse -- drew public outcry and were withdrawn by distributor After Dark Films. Sadly, the movie that has finally reached theaters hardly seems worth the uproar.

The plot takes the shape of one abuse after another, punctuated by inane dialogue (killer by intercom: "Why do bad things happen to good people, you ask? That's the mystery"; Jennifer in a TV interview the killer plays on a taunting loop: "It's not just me. It's a scientific fact: Beauty rules. It always has, and it always will"). When Jennifer discovers a second captive, Gary (Daniel Gillies), she's heartened -- but viewers are troubled: His sudden appearance is ridiculously convenient, and his pretty-boy slickness is surely more corny than reassuring. The film tries to have it multiple ways, both condemning the killer's self-importance and disapproving of Jennifer's superficial performance -- as well as the system of high-fashion imagery that encourages him to desire and hate her at the same time. The fact that Captivity also flashes back to an atrocious scene showing the killer with his sexually abusive, drugged-out mother doesn't quite excuse him, but does -- predictably and quite painfully -- find a way to blame a woman for what's wrong with him.


Sign Up Message
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
Each week we send a customized newsletter to our parent and teen subscribers. Parents can customize their settings to receive recommendations and parent tips based on their kids’ ages. Teens receive a version just for them with the latest reviews and top picks for movies, video games, apps, music, books, and more.
Please enter an email address.
Please check your email address for possible typos.
Sorry, you must be 13 or older to subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Sign me up!

What families can talk about

Families can talk about the trend of "torture porn." Why is this sub-category of horror movie (which also includes Saw, Hostel, and others like them) so popular right now? Is there a particular statement you think filmmakers are trying to make? If not, what's their motivation? Is "violence for violence's sake" enough of a reason to make -- or see -- a movie? Families can also discuss the movie's messages about beauty. Why is Jennifer victimized? Why does her tormentor resent her appearance? How does Jennifer feel about the way she looks?


This review was written by Cynthia Fuchs
Teen, 14 years old
April 9, 2008
 
Not apropriate
Defeinetly inappropiate for me.

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
April 9, 2008
 
Why ask Why????????
This film shouldn't be watched by any human. It is purely TOXIC and mind corrupting!

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 16 years old
April 9, 2008
 
its not good for ages under 6 or 7
its good for teems and its not good under 14

Flag as inappropriate 
Educator and Parent of 20, 23, 26, and 26 year old
July 12, 2009
 
Save your money
I sat through this and as I was leaving, another guy looked at me and said "I think we just saw the worst movie of the year". I agree. Not scary, just a waste of 90 minutes.

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
April 9, 2008
 
Good stuff in TV
Thank you for offering this service.

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
March 22, 2012
 
Pathetic excuse for a horror film
If you've seen any one of the dozens of "torture porn" movies to come out in the last few years, there's nothing new here. People are abducted and held in a dark, dank dungeon for no apparent reason other than to satisfy someone else's sick perversity.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 13 years old
January 31, 2012
 
The feel bad torture porn movie of 2007.
I wouldn't say it's absolutely mind corrupting,but then again it's a torture porn flick so teens and above only.If your kid has nightmares about torture and violence,it's not the brightest idea to show it to them.So yeahhhhh,I agree with rusty ol timer,it's a cross between 14-17.Still,if you want a better horror flick,go watch Saw .I have watched this on DVD unrated version which features a lot more gore than the theatrical version(missed it at the theatre) and the only reason why I did is because it's a 8 films to die for after dark flick and I love 8 films to die for.

Flag as inappropriate 

This review was written by Cynthia Fuchs
Studio:After Dark Films
Director:Roland Joffe
Cast:Daniel Gillies, Elisha Cuthbert, Pruitt Taylor Vince
Genre:Horror
Run time:85 minutes
Theatrical release date:July 13, 2007
DVD release date:October 30, 2007
MPAA rating:R
MPAA explanation:strong violence, torture, pervasive terror, grisly images, language and some sexual material.

This review was written by Cynthia Fuchs
 

Review It

Share your review with others

Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.
About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

Great alternatives handpicked by our editors

 

vote now

Will you see Captivity?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Been There? Tell us about it