About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

A safe community is important to us.
Please observe our guidelines.

All teen and kid reviews for Casino Royale (2006)

Age
12
Average rating based on 51 kid and teen reviews:
  • 51% say violence is an issue
  • 39% say sexual content is an issue
  • 29% say there's too much drinking, drugs, or smoking
Kid, 13 years old
September 27, 2009
 
Mature teens, I saw it with dad and am mature 11 yr. old!
I am a die-hard Bond Fan along with my dad, and we LOVED this movie! This is my favorite Bond so far, even better then Quantam. There are violent, disturbing scenes as with all Bond movies, and a very riveting scene. Action-packed and exciting this is a very good movie for mature bond-fans.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 16 years old
August 4, 2009
 
Not a good bond movie
In terms of content, Casino Royale is a very mild PG-13 movie. Some moderate violence is shown, except for a very intense torture scene involving a club being whipped upon Bond's bare genitals (not visible, rather implied). As for a movie review, it quite frankly, is not a very good bond movie. Bond should be about gadgets, action, and sex, but this movie shows a darker side of Bond. Torture never existed in previous bond movies

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 12 years old
December 15, 2009
 
The perfect action movie.
This a good movie. There is an amazing seen where Bond is trapped ina building that is falling down. There is a good amount of sexual behaivior.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 18 years old
September 27, 2009
 
Great but a disturbing torture scene
The torture scene made me scared

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 18 years old
July 3, 2009
 
A great prequel to the Bond franchise
This movie is a great prquel/reboot to the Bond franchise. It's also one of the most violent Bond films since "License to Kill". I think nthat the nude torture scene where the villian whacks bond with a rope was not needed. It was the first time that they had Bond naked for torture, and also the most violent torture they've done so far. Another issue is that messes up his trademark "Sharken not Stirred" line in one scene where the bartender asks him "Shaken or Stirred?" and Bond says "Does it Look like I give a D*mn" The action sequences were great, and it was neat to see how Bond got his start. I also liked the cliffhanger ending which leads into "Quantum of Solace". Not for kids under 13. This movie is too violent and sexual for them. Iffy for 13, and great for 14 and up.

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 12 years old
February 17, 2011
 
action
Great movie lots of action

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 9 years old
May 8, 2011
 

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 15 years old
August 12, 2010
 
See this before QOS
This is an awseome James Bond.It has cool stunts and class chase through Madagascar. Before you see Quantum Of Solace see this so you'l actually understand what's going on.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
October 24, 2009
 
Okay for Tweens
Loved it, Loved it, Loved it. this was the first bond movie i ever saw and i am now literally hooked. the fight scenes are amazing and i just love the cars. this movie is a little violent but it was great. anyone over the age of 14 should be okay watching it.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 14 years old
April 11, 2010
 
OO7
I like Casino Royale because it has a cool gunbarrel sequence more violent then die anouther day good effects i like the end line the names Bond James Bond

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
August 7, 2009
 
there was a toture scene which wasnt pleasnt but it was short and the other content was mild

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 11 years old
February 11, 2011
 
Watch this
Very good film but contains quite a lot of violence. Not for anyone under 10.

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 11 years old
March 13, 2011
 
11+
This is my favourite Bond movie. It's violent and contains a scene of torture. Bond goes to bed with a woman and they're naked (you can't see anything apart from bare arms and legs). The word "b-----d" is used and so is the word "ass".

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 15 years old
March 22, 2011
 
12+ would enjoy it 25+ would get it more.
i thought it was the best bond film because it wasnt as korny or unbelievable. i know people think the new bond attitude is bad, but its reality to get angry after deaths of friends ect.

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 13 years old
April 9, 2010
 
New 007 Darker Than Originals
This James Bond movie is MUCH more violent and brutal than the films that precede it. There are bloody and intense fight scenes that little kids just don't need to see. In Casino Royale (the actual casino) Bond and the other player drink. Drinking is excessive (no drunks, though) in this film. There are some tender scenes and some sexual scenes. When Bond is tortured, they strip and whip his "private area." There is no nudity in that scene. If you find this movie inappropriate, try the earlier Bond films.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 16 years old
July 5, 2010
 
Pretty Good

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 16 years old
April 4, 2009
 

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 11 years old
March 19, 2011
 
Good
This is a very good film. It's my favourite Bond film. Contains: Frequent, moderate action violence.

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 13 years old
May 9, 2009
 
Umm, great but NOT FOR KIDS!
I loved this. But I have to say in wasn't good for me AT ALL. Sexual Situations: Sexual kissing on floor and bed between different woman; nude slapping with a hard rope that makes James go to hospital after injuries of the slapping, making out, too. Violence: If you could rate stars out of violence, I'd rate them all! Bombs, pistols, stabbing, cutting off an arm (not shown, but yes, you get the idea). SO MUCH DEATH! (you see the death scenes). Etc. Language: M just HAS to say a cuss word over the tiniest things! (h*ll, a**, MAYBE a da**). Message: Terrible message for young ones! Lots of drinks served and drugs that are against the law. (I think you got the idea from what's shown above).

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
February 12, 2009
 
Bond's Back at his Best, but Think before taking the Kids
Since Ian Fleming created Bond, he has gone through many incarnations. Sean Connery had perfected Bond in his first movies, being able to switch between ruthless and a charmer. Roger Moore was a very good Bond but wasn't able to stand to the juggernaut of Connery. Pierce Bronsman had the same problem. But today, I have to say, this new Bond is easily better then the past ones and can stand up with Connery. He is ruthless, charming, and even a bit humorous. The movie starts off in one of the most memorable opening sequence of any Bond film. Shot in black and white, it shows Bond becoming a 007. While the stories plot can be a little difficult to follow as a whole, it is an enjoyable experience. It is the best Bond I've seen since Goldfinger. As for age, not only do I think that this should not be seen by children because of the content, but I also think that the younger one's should see the older Bond movies first. If they are interested, of course. There are scenes of great emotional destress and even torture. This is not a children's movie. But for the people who have seen other action movies like, say, "Hot Fuzz" this should be appropriate. In conclusion, don't take children, but if you want to see James Bond at the top again, see this film.

Flag as inappropriate