Parents need to know that this film includes constant violent episodes and a series of threats of violence. (This installment in the Die Hard franchise does, however, have less hand-to-hand combat and individual violence. Instead, it includes larger explosions that target an increased number of innocent citizens.) Both good guys and bad guys use vulgar language and physical violence to get their points across. McClane drives recklessly when in pursuit of the villains. Parents may seriously want to consider the effects of watching this film in post-9/11 America. The bad guys blow up city blocks, plant bombs in parks, and target the subway system. It may be a little too close to real life for comfort. In addition, as with all of the Die Hard films, the protagonist John seeks justice through his own means (and contrary to rules of law).
Positive messages:The film includes individuals who risk their lives for those of strangers and more problematic characters who live to risk others' lives. As in all of the Die Hard films, the police appear wholly inept. The villains appear as stereotypical evil Germans. McClane actually seems to put fewer innocent people in jeopardy in this version. DIE HARD WITH A VENGEANCE does win the prize for being the first in the series to include a woman in an active role (aside from Molly McClane). She is, unfortunately, a ruthless killer.
Violence:Exploding city block, lots of gunplay, knife fight, throat slitting, physical violence by a gang of African American men, chain fight, explosion of a NYC subway system, bank robbery, lots of blood, near drowning, bomb planted in a school.
Sex:Brief moments of rough foreplay between two of the villains.
Language:Racial slurs, repeated use of the f-word, frequent swearing by both good guys and bad guys.
You know, I think it's great. Great on TV. I don't know how anyone would care to watch a movie with a sware in every sentance. It is also very offensive to both black and white people. When John is walking around NYC with a sign hanging over his neck saying I Hate N*****s. Besides that, I think it was great.
Incredibly entertaining. Funny and violent. Samuel L Jackson is perfect partner for Bruce Willis. Plot revolves around terrorist/bomb threat in New York City. Bombs blow up city blocks and kill innocent people; many more are placed around the city and in a school filled with small children. Sporatic violence: gunshots produce spurts of blood, an innocent man's neck is slashed multiple times causing blood to spray out all over walls, a man's head is pushed barely offscreen and shot point blank resulting in lots of blood and brains splattering over walls and people, a man is cut in half by a wire (at a distance but clearly visable onscreen), villan kills innocent people with no remorse, and as usual McLane is soaked in blood most of the movie. Constant strong language: almost every sentence contains explicit language, around 100 uses of f--- alone, with just as much with other foul words, constant use of the N-word by and against black people, McLane is forced to walk into Harlem with a sign saying "I HATE N******" (not censored in film). Racism is a very big topic here, and is suprisingly thoughtful. McLane drinks and is addicted to painkillers.
This is the 3rd movie in the Die Hard franchise and one of my favorites.
As always, John McClane is stuck in bad situation and has to save the day, this time alongside a racist black man from NYC.
Violence is extreme with lots of blood. There are 98 uses of f--k and drug use.
I thought this movie was really good. There was a LOT of strong language like there was 93 uses of f--k,and there was 3 uses of n----r (one on a sandwichboard). There was a lot of violence too. There was slits of throats,shootings,explosins, and beatings. But if your parents don't care about language in a movie I would say for 12+.
Most Enjoyable Die Hard...and the least questionable.
The Die Hard movies have always been incredibly entertaining, hard-R rated Indiana Jones adventures for adults. DIE HARD 3 is no exception. However, though it is just as entertaining, it is also less questionable than its predecessors. Though it deserves its R rating (mainly for language), it could prove a better alternative to the other two films.
Violence is pretty much your standard John McClane stuff: people are shot and held hostage. Some perish when building or helicopters explode. However, unlike the previous Die Hard movies, only a few of these violent acts are very graphic. Though most feature some blood, only a shoot-out on a boat and a brief attack on terrorists in an elevator are explicit. This movie relies more heavily on stunts than violence. The pervasive language is the big reason for the R rating. There are more than 100 "f" words, but most are said quickly out of frustration and are not sexual in context. There are also some derogatory racial terms. A man and a woman briefly start to make out (he opens her shirt to reveal her bra) but they are interrupted by a big bang (literally). Parents should still view this before watching it with their teen to make sure it's appropriate, but you have a better chance with this Die Hard than the others.
It's good to have the same director/writer back, and he's shown us that he's much better than whoever did "Die Hard 2: Die Harder".
Not much sex/nudity, just a brief shot of a woman's breast (with a bra on)
A fair amount of violence, three explosions with some gun fights.
~50 f-words, usually used out of frustration.
Make sure you see the first three before you see "Live Free or Die Hard", it just makes it that much better.