Final Destination 2 (R, 2003)

common sense media says

Gruesome, ridiculous, really bad waste of time.


parents & educators say
  • 36% say violence is an issue
  • 36% say sexual content is an issue

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that this movie is very gory and that death is a meaningless event held up for entertainment value. Many of the accidents involve everyday items, which might lead some audience members to view their surroundings in a much different way. Several college age kids use drugs in a casual, off-hand manner that the other characters appear to accept. Parents in this movie seem unwilling to discuss possible peril with their children and are powerless to help their teens survive.

Violence: Over-the-top, inventively gruesome violence, extremely explicit and gory deaths of most main characters, near constant peril.
Sex: Brief non-sexual nudity, references to casual sex among college students and a pornography collection
Language: Strong language
Consumerism: Not applicable.
Drinking, drugs, & smoking: Explicit drug use by several characters, including cocaine/marijuana use, abuse of prescription medication by an adult

More on Final Destination 2

What to talk about

Talk to your kids
Families can talk about the characters' different reactions to surviving the accident, and facing the continuing danger to themselves. One of the characters proclaims that he is the master of his own fate and that therefore he will not die. Parents might discuss this concept of fate and the role of our own actions to influence our futures.

What's the story?

What's the story?
If you saw the first Final Destination, or even just the preview for this sequel, then you are familiar with the plot. A group of people know that they are going to die; what they do not know is how this untimely event is going to take place. It is for this "how" that the audience, eyes darting around the screen to pick out possibly lethal traps, stays riveted for most of the movie's 100 minute running time. As with the first movie, the premise is that we cannot escape death when our turn has come, so if we were meant to die in an accident but somehow skip this fate, then we are due another visit from death to correct the omission. In this case, strangers on the merge to the highway avoid death in the form of a fiery pile up due to the premonition of the pretty but uninteresting, Kimberly (A.J. Cook). While still congratulating themselves for not dying, the survivors begin to fall victim to a string of bizarre accidents. Kimberly seeks out the sole survivor from those fated to die in Final Destination, Clear Rivers (Ali Larter), who has some helpful things to say but cannot stop the body count from rising.

Is it any good?

Is it any good?
 
Not bothering with everyday movie conventions like plot, acting, or logic, this wisp of a sequel found its competitive advantage in Final Destination and pursued it with gleeful abandon. The first movie took the time to follow teen horror flick conventions, to develop characters -as thin as they were - and to throw in some theories about why all these people were dying. In the second movie, all these time-fillers are skipped and the movie becomes a heaping helping of mind-boggling mayhem. FINAL DESTINATION 2 asks why it should bother with the parsley of plot, dialogue, or characters, when people just want a plateful of death.

In many ways, tunneling all of the sequel's energies into a smorgasbord of imaginative deaths works better than the heavy-handed "suspense" of the original film. The acting is mediocre at best. Do they solve the riddle in time? Few will care, considering that there is no reason to like any of the characters and the main thrill of the movie comes from the elaborate nature of the deadly accidents. If this movie is supposed to be a scary thriller, then it flies far of the mark. If, however, Final Destination 2 seeks to take us no further than bloody spectacle, then it does a fine job indeed.

Movie themes & details

Movie Details
Studio: New Line
Director: David R. Ellis
Cast: A.J. Cook, Ali Larter, Michael Landes
Genre: Horror
Run time: 100 minutes
Theatrical release: January 31, 2003
DVD release: July 22, 2003
MPAA Rating: R
MPAA explanation: strong violent/gruesome accidents, language, drug content and some nudity

This review was written by Nell Minow
 
 

Review It

 

Review Final Destination 2





Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.
 

What parents & educators say

15
Based on 14 parent & educator reviews:
  • 36% say violence is an issue
  • 36% say sexual content is an issue
  • 29% say language is an issue

Most useful reviews by all members

 
Scary and smart
Better than the first.The two goriest scenes are when the boy is crushed by a pane and a woman is impaled through the head by a pole.A breif scene of nudity ad extreme vilence.

B-KMastah
teen, 15 years old
 
Okay, But Not for Any Kids.

antoineisthebest
teen, 15 years old
 
for mature teen
gory

Panya
adult
 
...
I LOVED the first Final Destination, and the sequel was good. But this is *definitely* not for kids. VERY gory.

 
good
very good movie

dklink
teen, 17 years old
 
bloody
yep. since i saw it on tv, almost everything was edited out. one character does drugs and friends dont care violence=gross! lots of gore

niceguy150
kid, 12 years old
 
for adults.
it ok but to much blood and gore and a brief shot of a female private part.

Goosebump
kid, 7 years old
 
FD2
sex:in one scene a girl lifts up her shirt and we see bare breasts. a man asks got evrything and a woman says condams (not sure if spelled right). swearing gory but still not to bad and i saw it today good movie.

Toffee_Cake
teen, 14 years old
 
Meh.
It was ok but nothing to scream and go and tell all your mates about. The gore was not very believable and it was kind of rubbish. At one point one of them dies because a ladder impales their eye but there was definitely enough time for him to move out the way but he just lay there while the ladder came towards his face -_- Definitely not the best of the films but a good watch.

mrbookworm01
teen, 13 years old
 
OK, but too much for young kids
I saw this movie on Starz and I don't know why CSM gave it a bad rating. It wasn't that bad. It's probably too much for young kids, but it's still an ok movie and the three main characters, Kimberly, Clear, and Officer Burke are good role models. Violence: Some gruesome deaths, the most gruesome deaths probably being a woman being impaled through the head by a pipe and a man being trisected by a flying barb wire fence, but nothing too bad for older teens. Sex: A woman on a motorcycle reveals her bare chest to a man in a car, and references to casual sex. Language: Use of strong swears like "f**k" and "b***h", and use of the middle finger. Drinking: A man is shown owning crack, a woman is shown drinking what appears to be liquor, and a main character is portrayed as a drug addict.

Jeffrey9789
kid, 12 years old
 
Final destination 2 not as good as final destination 1
This movie was not good. This movie is like the first final destination except it took place on a highway. This movie aint good because it dosent have any good details characters violent accidents. Dont buy this movie on DVD or blu-ray just watch it on FX

scissorluv971
teen, 14 years old
 
Pretty okay
This movie was pretty good. I think it was really harsh that they killed Tim (the kid who got crushed by the window) It looked sorta impossible but I guess the director has quite an "imagination" I think if you kids want to watch horror movies start them off with the classics/comedic ones such as scream, the ring,the uninvited, FD 1(although I would skip the scene where that kids head is cut in 2 by that sheet of metal) I would introduce the FD franchise at around 13-14. If it was my sister watching these I would start with the first one and see if she could handle it. It really depends on how strong of a stomach you've got. Quick question, doesn't it seem like the characters have no bones when they die? At least in the first 4?

 
too bloody
i love this movie so much i think its too bloody and dangerous for kids under 16 12 year olds will enjoy it sometimes

 
Not bad at all!
Really good plot line. Characters even try in this film to survive. Death scenes they are pretty decent not OTT but still it has blood and gore. if u liked first one you will like 2nd and 3rd

ClubBlood120
teen, 16 years old
 
Not for Under 10
I love this movie it is great for 14+ but some issues for younger. Some nudity not bad. Messages are hard to understand like how Alex dies from the first movie they should have shown that but other than that its great!

cheedarcheez
teen, 16 years old
 
Weird ways to die.
This movie has some violent, but interesting deaths. It has a plot that is OK but isn't that great. There's a scene where a teen is sniffing cocaine only to be sliced into three pieces by a barbed wire fence. Also expect some language.

Plague
parent
 
Final Destination 2
Its not a bad movie, but not even a close comparison to the first.

 
PERFECT FOR TEENAGERS OVER 16
This movie is way more gruesome and bloody than its previous film- NOT FOR KIDS UNDER 16

Napkap
teen, 15 years old
 
While it isn't perfect, it's far better than the first. The death scenes border on funny to terrifying, and it's fun to watch.

BRYTAN
parent of 13 year old
 

An independent voice for families
Age-appropriate reviews
 

vote now

Will you see Final Destination 2?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Great alternatives handpicked by our editors


About our rating system
ON: Content is appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child, some content may not be right for some kids
OFF: Not age appropriate for kids this age