About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

A safe community is important to us.
Please observe our guidelines.

All parent reviews for Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

Age
11
Average rating based on 122 parent reviews:
  • 53% say there are positive role models
  • 43% say there are positive messages
  • 41% say violence is an issue
  • 26% say sexual content is an issue
Adult
July 15, 2009
 
Clearly Should Be Rated PG-13.
I do not know why the MPAA found it fit to rate this movie PG, when it is parallel to Goblet of Fire and Order of the Phoenix. Parents, do not be fooled, this movie is very deserving of a PG-13 rating, but somehow did not end up with it. The opening scene, along with the ending ones (where somebody is killed) maybe be too intense for kids -- specifically the opening one, which involves the collapse of a bridge. This movie also focuses on who is dating who and relationships, where the others don't touch on it so much. There is some kissing and a double line about "doing" something with someone in one scene. Characters are also drunk around teenagers and teens appear to be drinking (wine, but that is still not acceptable). This is a much better movie than the others, stayed more faithful to the book (except for one scene...) and was still a good watch. Just be careful with the rating.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 4 and 6 year old
July 15, 2009
 
Should be PG-13
Good movie but definitely deserved a PG-13 rating. Numerous violent and scary parts.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 12 and 18 year old
July 21, 2009
 
Another great installment in the epic drama of Harry Potter
Perfect for kids 10 and up. I think there wasn't really anything scary until the skeletons in the lake near the end of the movie. If you read the book, it was expected and not that shocking. I can't wait for the next two movies.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 10 and 15 year old
July 23, 2009
 
PG-13 not PG
Not too sure about the amount of drinking going on. Whether the drinks were alcoholic or not, the word "beer" occurs and thats enought to get the message across. I get that teenagers are practicing at being more adult through kissing... then the rating should be PG-13, so my eight year old doesn't need to watch young people doing what adults do. I would think strongly about taking children under 12... their minds should be somewhere else.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 12 and 15 year old
July 17, 2009
 
PG rating is spot on.
I am still digesting the movie after having seen it only hours ago, but I thinki the PG rating is spot on. I don't feel the "snogging" was anything to worry about as you the camera doesn't really stay on the scene long. The one close up kiss was short and sweet. As for the violence, most is suggestive and also brief or the camera cuts away quickly. I think though for content I would recommend reading the book which is the best possible way experience the magical world. There is just so much that can't be condensed into 2 1/2 hours.

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
June 27, 2009
 
NO
so bad

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
July 14, 2009
 
Not a review but an Warning for parents out there with kids ages 6-11 This movie is not for that audience
i belive that this film has gone darker than the previous, Ever since the 4th film its been going dark and dark and this film should not deserve a PG Rating. You need to know your kids, When i steped into a theatre once in a PG13 Movie i saw too many kids, Parents you are falling for the wrong things and not taking reviews seriously, this movie is not a ovie you would want to take your 10 year olds to, This is a dark PG, on the border of PG/Pg13, in britan it is 12a (Same thing as PG13 Here) Our MPAA did not do this rate this right. Later kids will get night mares and it is too scary, the inferi,Dumbledores death, Tom riddles horid past, Destruction of the borrow and ECT before you watch it i suggest you know your kids and know the movie. This is sad.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 2, 13, and 15 year old
July 16, 2009
 
O M G this movie was A M A Z I N G!!! It was the BEST Harry Potter movie yet!!! With the exception of Narcissa Malfoy and Tonks, the actors are perfect and exactly as you would picture them in the book, and the special effects were phenomenal! There was only one thing that freaked me out a little: Katie Bell getting Cursed by the Dark necklace was a bit frightening even for a thirteen year-old. Other than that, it was a fantastic magical adventure that I want to watch again and again!!!

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 11 year old
July 16, 2009
 
This is the funniest HP movie yet -- most of the humor is about the awkwardness of young love. Other laughs emerge as the 3 main characters realize that their problems keep reoccurring. It's the nervous laughs of inevitabililty. I saw this movie with three 10-year-old Harry Potter fans. They haven't finished the series yet, but they have seen all the previous movies and read some of the books. We liked it. This was not as violent as some other films rated PG -- including The Lion, The Witch & the Wardrobe (battle scenes and gruesome killing of Aslan are much worse), Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian (gory battles), City of Embers (much darker) or the PG-13 Golden Compass (rather weird & violent) and Pirates/Caribbean 3. The violence includes: Harry's bloody nose, Draco bloody after Harry nearly kills him in fear, and the death of a major character at the end. True, the Death Eaters and Bellatrix can be scary, but we didn't think they were as scary as the last movie. Bellatrix (played by Helen Bonham Carter) was so over the top she came off silly and childish (slightly amusing, too). Toward the end, the weird, gaunt bodies that try to grab Harry in the water in the underground cave are rather terrifying. They scared the kids the most. (I thought they looked like a contorted old Led Zepplin album cover.) You can close your eyes during that part and not miss the plot. The violence will seem more dramatic on the big screen, rather than on a DVD via TV. On a TV screen, this HP will seem tame compared to the previous 2 movies. Draco has interesting moral choices in the film. His actions could lead to good discussions about what he chose. You could also have positive discussions about young romance problems and girl/boy friendships. I like the way the 3 friends want to work together to help Harry. Ron's sister, Ginny, is becoming a good fourth friend. Good conversations could happen later about how siblings interact in this film, too. This film doesn't follow the book quite as closely as earlier movies. You may need to brush up on characters (such as Luna, Draco, Snape, Bellatrix) beforehand to better understand their personalities and motives. Like earlier films, this one has imaginative sets and the Quidditch scenes just keep getting better. This film is also not as grand in scope earlier ones. I think even 8 year olds that know that story (perhaps thru older siblings) and have seen similar types of films will have a good time. Go with your kids, even teen-agers, so you can have interesting conversations with them afterwards.

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
July 18, 2009
 
Great movie for tweens and teens.
I saw this with my 10 year old (huge fan of the books and the movies) and we had a great time. The flirting was cute/funny and I thought it was great that Harry and Hermione were so supportive of each other in their love triangles. There were only a few scary parts, not nearly as many as there could have been, given the content of the book. I thought Spiderwick was a much scarier movie with all the monster attacking/chasing kid scenes. I also thought the movie illustrated how important it is to keep striving toward your goal.

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
July 9, 2009
 
I'm just wondering why HP 6 is given the same rating as Disney's Up. It doesn't make sense. Up should have been rated G if they are making HP 6 PG.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 19 year old
September 26, 2009
 
I luv Harry Potter
a great movie. but I dont think Harry and Ginny should have kissed.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 15 year old
July 17, 2009
 
Should have been PG-13. (Some Spoilers)
I took my 13 yr old son to see this movie. We both really liked it. The chaste kissing by the kids was no big deal. The reason I think that this movie should be PG-13 is the violence. There are some scary parts. Dead people hiding underwater drag Harry down, but he is saved by Dumbledore. Harry is forced to feed Dumbledore a cursed potion, though Dumbledore begs him to stop. A couple of Wizard homes are burned. And a major character doesn't just die, this is murder. I also disagree that just because a child has read the book, they can handle the movie. What a child imagines is much different then watching what adult movie makers conjure up and is shown on a screen 30-80 ft. tall with sound coming at you from all directions.

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
July 29, 2009
 
The Best of the Series
PG-13 level peril,scariness, and violence. The kids' acting has improved so much and the story is strong. Sexual innuendo between all of the main characters. Love triangles are a main point in the plot. But there's nothing graphic. Gotta love Ron.

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
July 16, 2009
 
I saw this movie with my 7 and 9 year old today. We LOVED it. I am not one to bring my kids to age inappropriate movies but since we have read the entire series together , they knew exactly what was going to happen. If we had not read the books, I would have previewed this on DVD before allowing them to see it. In comparison to the "Transformer" movie, which was PG 13 ( I have only seen the first and NOT my kids), I would say Harry Potter is very mild. The whole romance thing was a little much for me but I think that it goes over the heads of younger kids ( especially boys)

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 11 and 13 year old
July 25, 2009
 
Entertaining for tweens but ultimately shallow and empty
As has been noted many times, this book is the most mature and darkest in the series up to that point. However I felt like the movie eliminated all the aspects that made the book marginally acceptable for younger children. The heart and soul, the morality of the novel was simply avoided in the film ... the scene in which Malfoy's mother begs Snape to protect her son was stripped of the emotion that was written into the novel. Dumbledore's explanation of how the power of love and loyalty overcome evil in the world was simply deleted from the film. Malfoy's struggle with good/evil was explored only very shallowly in the film. The one thing the movie stayed true to was Rowling's apparent obsession with alcohol in the 6th book (although the movie deleted the apparently alcoholic Professor, thankfully). I felt like this movie was simply an annoyance to the film makers -- it seemed to be made only because it was necessary to set up the next installment of the series. By normal teen movie standards, this movie is tame but parents should be aware that there is mild violence (actually fewer "battle" scenes than in the book), and making out and kissing features prominently throughout the movie, as does alcohol. Hagrid and Prof. Slughorn get drunk and Slughorn serves Ron and Harry alcohol. There is also one particularly scary scene involving zombie-like creatures which is disturbing for younger children. The PG rating really surprised me. I think kids who have already read the book without being scared will be able to handle the movie, but honestly this movie doesn't do justice to the novel. If you really want to understand the mythology of Harry Potter and Lord Voldemort or to have a meaningful discussion with your children about the struggle of good and evil, choices and consequences, and free will, you'd be much better off reading the Half Blood Prince aloud as a family rather than seeing this movie. I feel for the film makers having to adapt a 700 page novel, but this movie is simply too shallow to leave any kind of lasting impression. I left the theater feeling sad about the lost opportunity.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 10 and 14 year old
July 21, 2009
 
Poor adaptation but a must see for Potter fans! Not too scary!
Sorry, this was the worse book to movie adaptation of the series. SOOOOOO much was left out! Many things that the last movies will need to be on target. If you have not read the book - please read it. The title itself was so lamely explained by Snape as "I am the Half-Blood Prince". No background on Snape as a young man at Hogwarts and what has led him to this point in time. It was edited poorly! Too much time spent snogging and not enough battling. The grand fight at the end and Dumbledore's funeral was left out completely. The way D died was not accurately done though I thought they did a great job of showing that Dumbledore believed that Draco was worth saving. The scene in the sea cave with the skeletal mob was a little scary for under 10 but if they have read the books it was scarier in print. Belletrix is just scary but no scarier than any Disney witch. The scene of Katie Bell rising in the air and being possessed was the most frightening scene. In summary the PG rating was boderline but I thought it was appropriate. Parents as always have to judge if they think it would frighten their children. I have a 9 and 12 year old and they were fine. I do hope they get another Director for the last 2 films. This one was very poorly done! We love these characters and we will be there til the end!

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 8, 11, and 15 year old
July 17, 2009
 
Fantastic message, pretty good movie
I took all 3 of my kids to see this. We had listened to the book on CD, and my oldest has read it, so we knew what was coming. Having read the book, I was surprised at the PG rating. However, much of the violence in the book is left out of the film, so I can almost justify the PG. There are scary parts, though, and if you have sensitive kids, they will be afraid even if they know the plot. My 6 year old loved it, but she is fearless. My 10 year old is a sensitive guy, but he loves the series and really enjoyed the film. My 13 year old saw it twice in two days, and I am envious! We have talked a great deal about the good vs evil theme of the series. The final two films will be emotionally intense and somewhat violent. But isn't fighting evil intense and sometimes violent? The good guys are winning, but it isn't easy, and that's the lesson.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 12, 15, and 18 year old
July 17, 2009
 
e.g. Perfect for older kids, but not for tweens
I believe it should have been rated PG-13 again, like the previous ones, but only for a few scenes. I would recommend parents or older siblings see the movie first and then prepare the younger child for the few times they may be startled. I think this movie is far more cerebral than the past movies and for that it should have gotten a PG-13.

Flag as inappropriate 
Educator and Parent of 11 and 14 year old
July 16, 2009
 
Some scary scenes, but not as much as previous Harry Potter films. My 10 year old would have been a little scared with some of the scenes, but my 12 year old was fine. There was some kissing and a small bit of drinking. It was pretty long (almost 2 1/2 hours) so be prepared.

Flag as inappropriate