Hugo

 Review

Common Sense Media says

Spectacular book adaptation is great for tweens and up.
greenON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
yellowPAUSE: Know your child; some content
may not be right for some kids.
redOFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
not for kidsNOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids any age.

Find out more

Quality
 
Sometimes media can be age appropriate but a real waste of time. Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Parents say

Kids say

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that although this book-based period adventure about the art and magic of movies is rated PG, it may be a tad too mature for younger elementary school-aged kids. Between the orphaned main character (whose father dies in a fire), the looming threat of being sent to the orphanage by the mean station manager, and an extended sequence about the history of early film, it's unlikely that kids under 8 will follow the sophisticated story. Since author Brian Selznick's novel is aimed at middle-grade readers, that's a good age to target for the movie, too. Kids who do watch will take away worthwhile messages about perseverance and overcoming fears, and budding filmmakers will especially delight in the movie's second half. Expect a little bit of flirting and hand-holding, a few insults, and one drunk (adult) character.

  • Kids will learn about the history of film, silent movies, and real-life French director Georges Melies, who made hundreds of the earliest short films in movie history.
  • The movie emphasizes the importance of films and how magical movies can be for their audience. Hugo's relentless faith in his father, in his mission to fix the broken, ends up being a metaphor for healing Melies' broken heart. Hugo and Isabelle discuss how everyone -- every thing -- has a purpose, and you just have to find out what it is for that purpose to be met.
  • Hugo and Isabelle are brave kids who overcome their fears to discover the truth. Their perseverance, even in the face of danger, sets an example for adolescents to follow their passion, seek the truth, and help fix what's broken in the world.
  • Hugo's father is killed in a fire. The station inspector sics his Doberman on unaccompanied kids and then brusquely throws them into the station jail before transferring them to an orphanage. In a nightmare, Hugo dreams that he's about to be run over by a train and then that he transforms into the automaton.
  • Two different sets of adults flirt with each other and are shown walking hand and hand. Married Papa Georges recalls his love of Mama Jeanne, and the two embrace and kiss. Hugo and Isabel hold hands, and she kisses him on the cheek in one scene. The station inspector has humorous conversations with the policeman about marriage, infidelity, and a baby's parentage of a baby. The station inspector asks the policeman if he has "had relations" with his wife in the past year.
  • Insults like "idiot," "no-good thief," "liar," and "drunk."
  • Not applicable.
  • Uncle Claude drinks out of a flask and is obviously drunk. The inspector calls him a host of synonyms for "inebriated." People are shown with wine glasses at the train station cafe.

What's the story?

In this 1930s-set adaptation of Brian Selznick's Caldecott-winning novel, 12-year-old Hugo (Asa Butterfield) is an orphan who lives in a Paris train station. His prized possession is an automaton (mechanical man) that his late father rescued from museum archives before his death. Hugo steals from the various shops at the train station to get by, but when he attempts to swipe a wind-up mouse from eccentric toy seller Georges (Ben Kingsley), he embarks on an adventure that leads him to uncover exactly what the automaton is and why it's important. "Papa" Georges' orphaned goddaughter, Isabelle (Chloë Grace Moretz), befriends the mysterious Hugo, and the two explore the train station and Paris at large while evading the station inspector (Sacha Baron Cohen), who's notorious for sending unaccompanied kids to the orphanage.


Is it any good?

 

Martin Scorsese isn't the kind of director you'd expect to make a spectacular film for families. He is, after all, the auteur behind such mobster dramas as Goodfellas, Casino, and The Departed. But by selecting Selznick's genre-defying illustrated novel as his subject, Scorsese is able to tackle one of his personal passions -- the history of early film and a very real director named Georges Melies. Once Hugo discovers that Papa Georges is actually the long retired-but-not-forgotten prewar director, the story transforms into a visual love letter to the pioneers of film history, as viewed from the perspective of a young movie fan.

 

Butterfield is simply amazing. With eyes that evoke every emotion from awe to horror, the young English actor is a revelation, as is his on-screen connection to Moretz, one of America's best teenage actresses, and Kingsley, one of the best actors, period. Cohen provides much-needed comic relief with his manic portrayal of the crippled station inspector, who's also a lonely war veteran; and as film historian Rene Tabard, Michael Stuhlbarg is a stand-in for Scorsese and any serious film lover. The 3-D is dazzling and the set pieces as visually appealing as an actual walk through Paris. It might have seemed impossible, but Scorsese has proven that he can pull a Spielberg and create a magical movie -- about the magic of movies -- for all.


Sign Up Message
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
Each week we send a customized newsletter to our parent and teen subscribers. Parents can customize their settings to receive recommendations and parent tips based on their kids’ ages. Teens receive a version just for them with the latest reviews and top picks for movies, video games, apps, music, books, and more.
Please enter an email address.
Please check your email address for possible typos.
Sorry, you must be 13 or older to subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Sign me up!

What families can talk about

  • Families can talk about the movie's message about the art of filmmaking. Are movies as transformational as Melies claims? What is the role of movies -- to entertain, to educate, to provide meaning? Do all movies fulfill that role, or only some?

  • The movie says Hugo was looking for a message from his father but ended up on a journey "home." What does that mean? How is Hugo responsible for everything that transpires?

  • Fans of the book: How is the movie different than the story? What characters or scenes didn't make it into the adaptation? What did the filmmaker add that you liked? Why are changes sometimes made when books are adapted for the big screen?


This review was written by Sandie Angulo Chen
Kid, 12 years old
November 23, 2011
 
A brilliant take on the book is most enjoyable for those who have read the story
Hugo is very fun and touching. It closely follows the story with relatively few plot changes. Like the book, the movie deals with death, the treatment of orphans in the early 1930's of Paris, and friendship. Scenes are made visual that in the book were described in pictures. There is a rather tense (if you've read the book) moment when you see Hugo's dad walking in the museum, as readers of the story may be nervous about the inevitable fire. If you haven't read the book it is a "jump scene" when suddenly a fire rushes at Hugo's father. Also, Hugo's uncle Claude is shown as a drunkard, and later described so. Hugo is almost run over by a train twice, though, it turns out that the first time was just a dream. He also has a disturbing dream that he is turning into the automaton and being crushed by giant cogs. One scene made visual is the demonstration of what happens to orphans: Hugo sees a boy start to steal food, only to be roughly dragged off and put in a puny cell by the station inspector. The next day, that boy is put in a police van and presumably taken to an orphanage. This scene really disturbed my 10 year old sister, though I doubt most kids her age would find it so. There is a sweet romance between three pairs of characters; the station inspector and the flower vendor, a cafe waitress and a man whom her dog hates, and Mr. and Mrs. Méliès. Hugo and Isabelle also become fast friends, and help each other out of (and into) realistic dangers. This film will have appeal to both boys and girls, but may be most enchanting to those who have read The Invention of Hugo Cabret.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent
November 23, 2011
 
Good movie!
My family saw this today - husband, two daughters and me (wife!). My older daughter is almost 13 and really liked it (because she read the book!) while my 9 year old was lost a lot of the times. My husband and I liked the movie also but didn't really see the need for 3D as the glasses drive us crazy as well as the price! I would recommend it to others.

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 10 years old
November 27, 2011
 
Big disappointment
I am 9 years old and I went to see Hugo with my Mom on Saturday. I walked in excited and walked out very disappointed. It was torture for anyone who has read the book. We finished the book on Friday and loved it. We were excited to see the movie. However, for anyone who has not read the book it would be confusing and hard to follow. Isabelle did not look right. There was a funny element to the movie that was not in the book and did not belong. There were some long, corny scenes. The station inspector became a main character in the movie. He had a minor role in the book. Some of his lines were inappropriate. Overall, the movie was disappointing. The boy who played Hugo, though, was the perfect actor. He did a great job with a bad movie. We do not recommend the movie but we do recommend the book.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 13 years old
November 27, 2011
 
Love It!
Amazing. Just an amazing film. There isn't really anything too bad about it. Great film. I highly recommend you see this.

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 10 years old
November 26, 2011
 
Beautiful, magical movie-- as good as the book!
The book was so perfect, I couldn't imagine the movie would be good compared to the book, but amazingly, it was beautiful! The plot was just right, the actors were great, and the whole movie through I was moved, or dazzled by the images and similarity to the book. It's a magical story, made all the more magical by having it right in front of you. I can't say I like it more than the book, but I'd definitely buy it on DVD when it comes out! Some chase scenes (Hugo is a boy living in a Paris train station, so sometimes he steals food and the station manager chases him) might be a little tense for younger kids, but any tween, teen, or grownup would love it! So, so magically beautiful! Also, the 3D is very cool and worth it. A lot of the movies for kids in theaters these days are jarring, ugly and inappropriate, but this one was rarely perfect. Five stars!

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 12 years old
November 27, 2011
 
Truly the best!
There were no boring parts. This movie also teaches you how movies used to be and how they were silent. However, some parts were scary and may be disturbing for little kids. Also, they might not understand what is going on in some scenes. Overall, a great movie for tweens. P.S: the 3-D was amazing and magical!

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
November 25, 2011
 
Favorite movie of all of Martin scorsese and Johnny depp's work. Johnny depp produced it.
Great movie. Learned a lot about the history of film. My rating : G.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 10 year old
November 26, 2011
 
Beautiful cinematography; not quite the book
The visuals in this movie are lovely and in that way it does try to evoke the glory of movie-making. As others have said, it is a nice tribute to the magic of movies. For those of us who read and loved the book, the art of the book was a lot of its magic, and although the movie was different, it did seem to try to capture the beauty and intensity of the graphics. The star actor who plays Hugo is very talented and fans of British actors will see some favorites in supporting roles (including some from the Harry Potter movies). [spoiler alert ahead] I could not, however, give it an unqualified thumbs-up because of a few changes from the book. Inevitably, of course, there are changes from a book to a movie, particularly when length is an issue. However, what was done here was not just excising some plots/characters (e.g., the nice "Etienne" character) but adding an entire plot line and dimension that was not in the book. The Station Inspector becomes almost a main character and some of the actions seem gratuitous, with added chase scenes, a threatening dog, etc. I minded less the little subplot about the cafe owner and the newspaper stand owner, mostly because it was relatively minor (and it did add some light comic relief, nicely done but not found in the book). I assume that the book's author approved the modifications and additions, but from those of us who loved the book, it seemed somewhat off-kilter.

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 13 years old
December 3, 2011
 
very great for people and kids who can comprehend well
very great movie! No violence, accept hugo almost gets run over by a train in his dream, then in his real life. No sexual stuff. Isabelle kisses hugo on the cheek. The only reason I put it as 9+ is because the plot is advanced and the book is young adult level. Iread it and the movie follows nearly every word. My sister is 8 and she didn't really understand the messages.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent
November 27, 2011
 
Lukewarm (read the book instead)
I am not sure what a person who had not read the book would think about this movie, but my child and I had just finished the book and we were disappointed. While I know the movie must use creative license, there were some big changes that made for a disappointing experience for me (and for my child). The actor who plays Hugo was perfectly cast, but he might be the only one. Isabelle's looks and personality were both distractingly different. The station inspecter was written to be a shadow -- a person to fear but who did not really have a face. However, in the movie, the station inspector became a main character and this just felt wrong. My guess is that Sasha Baron Cohen probably refused to take the part unless his character played a bigger part in the movie. Also, his comedic scenes were ill-placed in a serious children's movie. If you are a big fan of the book you may be disappointed with this adaptation as there were some big, disappointing changes. Overall, I give a big thumbs up to the book but my response to the movie is tepid.

Flag as inappropriate 

This review was written by Sandie Angulo Chen
Topics:magic and fantasy, adventures, book characters
Studio:Paramount Pictures
Director:Martin Scorsese
Cast:Asa Butterfield, Chloe Grace Moretz, Christopher Lee
Genre:Action/Adventure
Run time:127 minutes
Theatrical release date:November 23, 2011
DVD release date:February 28, 2012
MPAA rating:PG
MPAA explanation:mild thematic material, some action/peril and smoking

This review was written by Sandie Angulo Chen
 

Review It

Share your review with others

Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.

Video review


About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

 

vote now

Will you see Hugo?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Been There? Tell us about it