Intense and violent.

I liked the movie I thought that the acting was pretty good..But Its always awesome when you see suck a strong creature be so Kind..Maybe its the women in me. lol My kids will not see this movie though until they are older.

They hardly make em like this anymore. Very rare straigh to the point superhero film-o-rama!

They hardly make em like this anymore. Very rare straigh to the point superhero film-o-rama!

Though it is true that this movie is a fun one, it is not for kids. The violence is very graphic, much more so than just "comic" violence. There is a fair bit of language, and not much alchohol(if any). There is some smoking, however. Also some kissing, but for the most part not much sexuality. There is a series of painful-to-watch injections, and a bit of blood. I personally don't think anyone under the age of thirteen should be watching this, and even some thirteen year olds will find it to be pushing their limits. On a side note, Iron Man may have been a better movie, but i liked this one much better.

This is a amazing movie.I think it's better the iron man.

I thought it was both dull and toward the end numbingly loud and violent. I was shocked to see a family in front of us with what looked like a 3 and a 6 year old. Way too intense and violent for kids of that age, IMHO.

Better than the Ang Lee version, but much more brutal.

My wife and I took the twins, 4 years old, and the baby, 3 years old, and found myself buying popcorn just to keep them in their seats. This is not a movie for the young ones, if fact, I had to take my baby girl our a couple of times to make sure she didn't disturbed the audience. The problem with this movie is that the action scenes are too far apart from each other, making the story interesting for older kids or parents by themselves. My wife gives the movie a good review and tells me that if I had seen it without the two visits to the restroom and the three visits to buy more candy. Other than that, the actions scenes keep the kids without moving a finger, but I was really concerned with the violence of the last 10 minutes, it was too graphic for my taste and I was wondering if it was going to be too much for the twins. It made me realize that I could not take them to see "Iron Man", so instead we opted to see "Kun Fu Panda" for a second time (read my review in the adults section of that movie). So if you want to enjoy this green monster, don't take young kids to the movie, you will have to buy at least five bags of popcorn and how they don't throw up. I just can't wait for them to grow up and see all the summer movies! I give this movie five popcorn bags, the lowest score for a 4 year old. Don't take your kids, please, or you will have to spend a lot of "green" to survive the experience.

These marvel movies continue to amaze me. I never think they will be any good, and just like Batman Begins, Spiderman, and Iron Man, I really loved this movie. It was very intense and loud, and the movie really captured the power of the Hulk, but it is still a fun movie to watch. There is definitly a LOT of violence, so don't take your younger kids to see this one. They will be very scared, there are a few very frightening parts. Kids will also be very disturbed when Bruce's dog gets tranquilized; a bad guy fires a dart into him. There is very little language, I was very surprised at that. I suppose that if they were going to make it so violent they needed to keep the language out to keep their PG-13 rating. Definitely 13 and up for this movie. Very fun, but very violent.

Well, I didn't see the first movie, but I heard that it was a big dissapointment. I personally thought that this movie was a good movie, though it upset me a little bit at the amount of killing Abomination and Hulk did. There are multiple painful injections, two of which are very hard to watch. A couple of the scenes when Bruce transformed into the Hulk were disturbing, and little kids might find the very sight and nature of both Hulk and Abomination very scary. The violence is pushing the limits for a PG-13, but nowhere near deserving and R rating. I think that most twelve year olds will find this moving pushing their limits, and I think that though they will enjoy the movie, it's best that they wait until they're 13 and older

The sexual scene was absolutely terrible even though "nothing" happened. Why even put that in this movie is an even bigger question?

the incredible hulk is a great movie. the effects in this are outstanding. this is how the hulk was supposed to be. the fight between the hulk and the abomination is awesome. lots of destruction in this movie. all the actors and actresses do a great job in this film. i have no complaints about this movie. all the fight scenes were awesome. this is much better than ang lee's hulk.

good movie one semi clothed kissing scene and says pis**d and crap so a bit hmmm but role models arent good a evil army guy who wants this guys blood not appropriate for anyone under 10

Better than the first one, with a lot more action. Not good for little kids, but 12-14year olds will love it.

are you really gonna watch this movie after all the bore from the first one? Well dont.

This was a great movie. At the end there was alot of violence and one kissing scene.

Pretty good.

Lots of blood and people thrown across parks and rooms

This film is not nearly as good as Iron Man, but the chase scene is good, but that's it.

This was the best hulk moive!I'm only 8 and this moive was the best and better then iron man!

The fight at the end is the only thing that was even close to being only for 13+ kids.

i think the hulk was a great movie. i wouldnt reccomend this movie for children under 9 but overall a great movie. i would recommend you watch it

It was a fantastic movie. there was alot of violence and a some parts had blood in it. The one part that was most iffiest was when David/Bruce was making out with Elizabeth then got on the bed kinda imitating sex.

This was an amazing movie. I was a bit hesitant to go see it because the last one wasn't all that great. I was seriously leaning forward the last half of the movie because it was so intriguing. I wouldn't take small children to this movie, but it's great for older kids who will appreciate the non-violent scenes as well as the action. I think this was more of a guy movie, but I didn't mind cause I'm kind of a tomboy. I can't say enough good things about this movie. It started out really intense and interesting and it never got boring. Loved it loved it loved it!

This is how the Ang Lee Hulk should have been. The funny thing is that Ang Lee's Hulk runtime was 132 minutes, and the new Hulk's runtime was 114 minutes, but the new one felt like more of a movie (in a good way). There is some swearing, but nothing major. My only concern was the images that you see, some of them are prity intense. Take for example the abomination, you can see his ribcage through the skin. Overall it is a good movie, but it is not better than Iron Man, Spider-man I, II, or III, X-Men I or II, Superman I, or II, Batman Begins, or Batman: the Dark Knight. 4 out of 5

this is a great movie with cool effects,tons of action,and perfect acting. May frighten young kids though due to transformations and painful looking injections. My rating PG-13 for intense Sci-fi violence throughout,disturbing images,some language, and brief mild sensuality

First there was the comic book, then the TV Show, then the always bad Ang Lee Hulk, then there's The Incredible Hulk. Let's start with the Pros: First of all, the CGI! It was magnificent! The action, brilliant! The last scene was LONG, but still good. Though it was a little fast. When I heard this was going to be a reboot, I thought, YES! It'll be good (i.e. Batman Begins) Zak Penn did a great job with the screenplay. The acting is a little both a pro and a con. Pro; Ed Norton is Bruce Banner. He was perfect for this role. I applauded him for his role in The Illusionist. William Hurt did a good job as well. Tim Roth is thought was so-so. The only thing I didn't like about this movie was Liv Tyler. She wasn't really that good for this role. I prefer Jennifer Connelly over Liv Tyler. That's the only thing I liked about Ang Lee's Hulk. Overall I give it a solid 4 and a half.

It is nowhere near Spiderman 1 and 2, Iron Man, Batman, or Batman Begins; that much is obvious. Edward Norton did give a good performance. It saved the movie. Otherwise, the constant CGI super effects got unrealistic so the action was average. Unfortunately, it ran out of steam at the end and lacked a conclusive ending. My rating: 70%

it was the best hulk movie yet!!!! i think people my age should see this movie!!!!!!!!!!

i like the moive very much.you should see it.

i like the hulk a little bit and this movie was pretty good so you cant argue with a good movie.