About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

A safe community is important to us.
Please observe our guidelines.

All parent reviews for The Lost World: Jurassic Park

Age
9
Parent of 15 year old
April 9, 2008
 
A Tired and Overhyped Sequel...Amazing Visual Effects, but that's about it.
JURASSIC PARK was a phenomenon. It broke through many film boundaries, in both visual effects and story. Audiences and critics adored it. You can't really say as much for the sequel, THE LOST WORLD. Spielberg tries. He really tries, and he deserves some credit. But this film falls flat on its face. Pros: Stunning visual effects. The dinos look even better than in the first. Also, there's an awesome suspense sequence about 30 minutes into the film, with the characters suspended over a cliff in a car. Cons: Weak, weak, and weak. This film hardly has a story. The first Jurassic Park film was focused on making people believe in the characters and the circumstances, then using the visuals to scare them. THE LOST WORLD is nonstop violence and dino action. The effects are enticing at first, then it just gets old. The film takes a turn for Godzilla at the end with a h*-hum climax that places a T-rex in San Francisco. The violence is alarming. While not too gory, it's constant and realistic. Language is moderate, but, thankfully, there's no sex. Pass this sequel. You might try it if you're a die-hard fan, but I don't reccommend it.

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
April 9, 2008
 
First ones better!

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 18 year old
June 3, 2011
 
its ok but not as good as the first one
the lost world doesn't have much of a story to it this time around. parents also need to know that the lost world is a bit more violent than the first one and the language is a bit more strong but not explicit.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 7, 18, and 20 year old
May 31, 2011
 
Enjoyable for our family.......even more enjoyable to an 8 yr old boy!
My 8 year old has nightmares pretty conisistently and it was a tough decision to let him watch this. However, after his excitment learning about dinasours in class and watching all we can on the internet, I felt that he was ready to watch the first Jurassic Park movie with the family. He loved it and didn't have any issues for weeks so we decided that it would be fine to watch this sequel since it is very similiar to the first - dinasours aren't real anymore, this is just a movie, and it can be fun to be scared during movies that portray someone's wild imagination. For us, this was the right decision...he loved it and had no problems after! Now on to the 3rd!

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
April 9, 2008
 
Fairly Bad Sequel
If I had the choice, I would have given the Lost World two and a half stars. It wasn't a horrible movie. It had some great suspenseful scenes and the dinosaurs were still cool. But the incredibly stupid characters do dumb things and Steven Spielberg tries to see if we care, and it is stupidly gruesome. The filmmakers forgot how to make real suspense, so resorted to pointless violence. And the ending is super cheesy. Really bad when compared to the original. Good for kids 11+

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
April 9, 2008
 
A little more violent than the first.
A Great Movie. A Guy is split in half. Guy is stepped on by a T-Rex.

Flag as inappropriate