About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

A safe community is important to us.
Please observe our guidelines.

All teen and kid reviews for Mission: Impossible 2

Age
12
Average rating based on 8 kid and teen reviews:
  • 100% say violence is an issue
  • 75% say language is an issue
  • 63% say sexual content is an issue
Teen, 14 years old
January 31, 2010
 
Not As Good As The First One!
It's okay but it isn't as good as the first one. can't wait to see the third one.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 18 years old
August 2, 2009
 

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 16 years old
April 17, 2011
 
better than the first but not as good as the third
What to watch out for * Violence: Lots of violence and intense peril. * Sex: Sexual references and situations. * Language: Some strong language. * Consumerism: Not an issue. * Drinking, drugs, & smoking: Social drinking, smoking.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
December 23, 2011
 
Action sequel is much better, more fun and entertaining than the first
The second film and first sequel in the Mission Impossible franchise, is (big surprise) absolute miles upon miles upon miles ahead of the original first film in the series. Here, director John Woo takes things over from previous director Brian De Palma and heats things up with a villain straight out of the James Bond movies,some exotic locations and good action sequences, which also feel like they are out of the James Bond movies, as well. So, overall, I think John Woo has made a much, much better sequel with this film. The only unfortunate thing about it is, that, it still isn't mindblowingly awesome, but nobody should ever expect that off of a movie (a action movie, mind you), because that just isn't fair, at all. So, the movie is Rated PG-13 for several reasons, and this time it is rather more deserved than with the first movie: There is frequent intense action violence including plenty of gunfights, fistfights, car chases and more. Also, there is frequent sensuality involving several sexually charged scenes, not to mention a couple post-sex scenes. Finally, there is infrequent but moderate profanity including sh-t, -ss, b-tch, d-mn, h-ll, and b-st-rd. So, if you liked the original, even though I strongly disliked it, I think you should still enjoy this sequel, which I very much did.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 14 years old
December 30, 2011
 
Slow motion
A O.K move, but to much slow motion. There is slow motion every 10 seconds!

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 11 years old
January 8, 2012
 
Much better than first!
It isn't non-stop action until the last 45 minutes except from one little car chase and a plane crash at the start. This doesn't seem like a spy movie it is just a plain action movie. The language is strong a--,h--l,d--n, bast---and a female character is called b--ch a few times. The story line is much easier to follow than the 1st. Kids may be scared when they see the effect of a chemical called chimera where blood cells are destroyed.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 15 years old
May 8, 2012
 
M:I-2
I thought it was really cool :D Lots of violence during some scenes, and a sex scene, and another scene of implied sex. . . no nudity, just a little akward. Better than the first, my second favorite of the series(beaten by ghost protocol)

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 14 years old
March 10, 2012
 
Great action movie
Lots of intense action, some mild language and innuendo. Teen movie

Flag as inappropriate