My Boy Jack

  • Review Date: July 30, 2008
  • NR
  • Genre: Drama
  • 2007
 Review

Common Sense Media says

Daniel Radcliffe goes to war as Kipling's son.
greenON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
yellowPAUSE: Know your child; some content
may not be right for some kids.
redOFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
not for kidsNOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids any age.

Find out more

Quality
 
Sometimes media can be age appropriate but a real waste of time. Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Parents say

Not yet rated

Kids say

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that characters swear explicitly during combat (not outside of it, though), and there is brief but bloody battlefield violence and fatalities. The younger Kiplings are shown sneaking cigarettes and alcohol unsupervised. Early readers who have come to idolize actor Daniel Radcliffe for his incarnation of Harry Potter should know this is a likeable but very different character he plays, who comes to a very different, sadder end. Viewers whose knowledge of English history and culture doesn't go much deeper than Hogwarts may feel left out.

  • Good manners, courageous bearing, and being a valiant warrior for king and country are the themes here, even if you wonder whether the filmmakers are endorsing the once-noble ideals of the British Empire or condemning them as having inspired the war that stained the Kipling household (and so many others) with loss. John is an unspoiled young man, and has no problem earning the friendship of the Irish volunteers he commands.
  • Brief but vivid shooting; explosions in the trenches of WWI, with blood gushing out of bullet wounds.
  • A naked Jack has a physical, but nothing explicit shown.
  • The F-word and Christ's name in vain under battle stress. "Ass," "hell" and "damn."
  • Viewers may be inclined to read Rudyard Kipling books (or see the movie versions).
  • The younger Kiplings smoke and drink unsupervised.

What's the story?

Opening in 1914, MY BOY JACK concerns the son of celebrated writer Rudyard Kipling (David Haig). In Imperial Britain the elder Kipling is more than just a successful creator of widely read adventure stories and poems like Gunga Din, The Jungle Book, and Kim; he upholds the spirit of the British Empire and publicly advocates war against a competing Germany. Kipling's teenage son John (Daniel Radcliffe), meanwhile, struggles to measure up to his father's lofty codes of manhood and patriotism. John wants to enlist in the Royal Navy, but Rudyard uses his considerable influence in the government to ensure the youth becomes a British Army officer instead. John's mother and especially his sister are less enthusiastic about his going off to fight when the war begins, and Britain initially suffers disastrous defeats. A well-liked leader of a platoon of Irish Guards, John is reported missing in action after a huge battle, bringing much grief and introspection to the prominent Kipling household.


Is it any good?

 

Much like Christopher Columbus, Rudyard Kipling represents, for some people, an idol of the finest quality, and for others (especially those on the political left), he summed up the worst; a conquest-happy nationalist who never served a day in uniform himself, but who used his literary talents to propagandize for British armed strength and superiority worldwide. This story, based on fact (and a poem Kipling wrote in tribute to his son) could well have portrayed the author as a foaming fanatic who sent his boy to suffer in the trenches for his own personal glory. But -- and as My Boy Jack was first aired on British television for a national holiday honoring war veterans -- the filmmakers recognize that nobody at the time had that attitude. Thus, we have a fair-and-balanced script that doesn't judge harshly by making Kipling too extreme or his wife too reproachful.

In this treatment though, something notable got overlooked: John himself. He seems like a nice, capable, unpretentious young adult, not at all stuck up as a child of privilege. He's self-conscious about his weak eyesight and well accustomed to his dear domineering dad -- and that's about it. Well-acted and handsomely produced, My Boy Jack just doesn't have much to say about the title character or the challenges of growing up Kipling. Viewers not especially spellbound with the time period may hunger for more drama and insight.


Sign Up Message
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
Each week we send a customized newsletter to our parent and teen subscribers. Parents can customize their settings to receive recommendations and parent tips based on their kids’ ages. Teens receive a version just for them with the latest reviews and top picks for movies, video games, apps, music, books, and more.
Please enter an email address.
Please check your email address for possible typos.
Sorry, you must be 13 or older to subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Sign me up!

What families can talk about

Families can talk about Rudyard Kipling, and how his literary output and political prominence propped up the British Empire. You can compare his books to movies based on them, especially The Jungle Book. How tough (or cool) might it be as the son of a national icon?


This review was written by Charles Cassady Jr.
Parent of 19 year old
September 30, 2009
 
the sadest movie i have ever scene
COANTAINS SPOILER my favorite actor in the world is daniel radcliffe. So i rented the movie and watched it. and it was the sadest movie i had ever scene! when jack goes missing in the war his family does everything they can to find him. But then trgicly they find out that he had died ( and in the scene they show him being shot and falling to the ground and dies) i cried and cried and cried at that part. and one of the sadest things is that his father insisted that he went to war and when Jack dies he begins to realize that he basicly murdered his own son. a very sad story. ONLY FOR MATURE VIEWERS.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 14 years old
December 7, 2009
 
vilont and sad
vilont and sad!

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 14 years old
November 7, 2009
 
A SAD MOVIE MOVIE.... BUT STILL A GREAT ONE
this movie is very sad, and not to mention vilont. This Harry Potter star stars in my boy Jack a sad war drama about a young 18 year old boy whos dream is to fight in war and protect his country. Jack is very nice and determined character but there is some swearing that he says and he smokes without any supervision. Kids under 11 will find themselves confused and scared of the content and images in the movie. kids 12 and older wont be as scared or confused but still the ending will shock them. And if your daughter is in love with Daniel Radcliffe DON'T let her watch this movie!!!!! Bottom line: great movie just not for everyone.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 14 years old
October 28, 2009
 
1-10
this movie is awsome!!!! but sad. I will rate things on a scale from 1-10 on how extreme the content is or how much u should be consenered about it. these are for kids who are 8: HOW EXTREME for there age: VILONCE: 10 SEX: 3.8 LANGUAGE: 9.8 CONSUMERISM: 1.2 DRINKING,DRUGS ECT. : 6 HOW MUCH U SHOULD BE CONSENERED: VILONCE:10 SEX: 2.1 LANGUAGE: 10 CONSUMERISUM:1 DRINKING DRUGS ECT. : 4.2) these 1-10 scales are for kids 9-10 year old. HOW EXTREME for there age: VILONCE: 9.5 SEX: 2.5 LANGUAGE: 9.5 CONSUMERISM: 1 DRINKING DRUGS ECT. : 5.8 HOW MUCH U SHOULD BE CONSENERED: VILONCE:10 SEX: 1.3 LANGUAGE: 9.8 CONSUMERISM: 1 DRINKING DRUGS ECT.. : 4) these scales are for kids 11-12 years old. HOW EXTREME it is for there age: VILONCE: 9.4 SEX: 1.5 LANGUAGE: 9.4 CONSUMERISUM:1 DRUGS DRINKING ECT. : 5 HOW MUCH U SHOULD BE CONSENERED: VILONCE: 9.6 SEX: 1.2 LANGUAGE:9.3 CONSUMERISUM: 1 DRINKING DRUGS ECT: 4.8) these scales are for teenagers ages 13-14: HOW EXTREME IT IS for there age: VILONCE: 7.9 SEX:1 LANGUAGE: 8.1 CONSUMERISUM:1 DRINKING DRUGS ECT. : 3.1 HOW MUCH U SHOULD BE CONSENERED: VILONCE:6.8 SEX:1 LANGUAGE: 10 (teenagers are into a stage where if they hear the swear they say the swear) CONSUMERISUM: 1 DRINKING DRUGS ECT: 8.9 ( there is a point in a teenagers life where they might think about smoking this movie might influence the idea even more for them to smoke)

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 13 years old
October 16, 2009
 

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 14 years old
February 25, 2011
 
Great, But Be Careful!
This movie really changed my view of World War I and is an amazing educational and entertaining story. But there is a lot of violence, and the ending is sad and scary. Jack and Elsie smoke frequently, trying to hide it from their parents. But if children can see past that, the movie is life changing, not to be dramatic or anything.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 14 years old
November 9, 2009
 
GREAT MOVIE
This was awsome and vilont!!! i loved it!!!!! And this a perfect movie for older tweens to watch to teach them about war!!! BUT BE WARNED THE ENDING IS MUCH TO SAD AND OVERWELMING FOR YOUNGER KIDS.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 14 years old
March 25, 2010
 
i love the movie the end its sad

Flag as inappropriate 

This review was written by Charles Cassady Jr.
Studio:BBC
Director:Brian Kirk
Cast:Carey Mulligan, Daniel Radcliffe, David Haig, Kim Cattrall
Genre:Drama
Run time:93 minutes
Theatrical release date:November 11, 2007
DVD release date:April 20, 2008
MPAA rating:NR

This review was written by Charles Cassady Jr.
 

Review It

Share your review with others

Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.
About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

Great alternatives handpicked by our editors

 

vote now

Will you see My Boy Jack?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Been There? Tell us about it