About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

A safe community is important to us.
Please observe our guidelines.

All parent reviews for Old Dogs

Age
9
Average rating based on 18 parent reviews:
  • 44% say there are positive role models
  • 44% say there are positive messages
  • 44% say there's too much drinking, drugs, or smoking
Parent of 12 year old
December 21, 2009
 
A Family Flick for sure!!!
This is a GREAT movie for the whole family! On the PSP, the label is visible and they talk about the car company Nissan. Old Dogs sad at one part where Charlie's dog dies but, there is nothing sad in the rest of the movie. It's also Hilarious at some parts. If you don't know what to rent or see in theatres with the "fam", go see Old Dogs. It's Great!

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 9 and 13 year old
March 14, 2010
 
Quite boring for adults but good laugh for younger kids
I m Hungarian and we watched it with my 8 and 11 y-o with subtitles.I found it fairly boring and agree with those who said it was nothing special. For me Robin Williams in Captain Hook or John Travolta in Phenomenon were way more entertaining and this film was a great disappointment.Bed time story with Adam Sandler was much funnier too. I couldn't even think of a good message it had. Being a mother I could not identify with Kelly Preston, the mother. Why on earth would anyone keep in secret having twins for 7 years and not tell about it to the father? The story s too direct, without excitement , but there are some laughs . My 8 y-o son definitely loved it and he said he wanted to watch it dubbed. My daughter said the same.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 11 and 14 year old
December 11, 2009
 
Yes, you know from the first frame of the movie how the story will unfold and end. However, while the trip is predictable, the acting, cameos and tempo of the film make it a very enjoyable experience. My kids are 9 and 12 and both loved it. Everyone in theater shared their enthusiasm and laughed throughout the film. The movie was not at all hard edged and was utterly appropriate for my kids. The reference to Friday the 13th, which caused one reviewer concern, was offered only to demonstrate Travolta's absolute lack of expertise with what is and what is not appropriate for kids. All in all a fun and harmless film that charmed all in out theater; kids and adults alike.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 8 year old
December 31, 2009
 
Beware the dog dying scene.
The main thing my 7 yr old daughter didn't like about the movie was that the long time friend of one character, his dog, dies in the movie. For a 7 yr old who has her own dog, this was very upsetting. And no where in any info does it warn you about this.

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
December 4, 2009
 
3 generations went to see this movie, me, mom, and kids. we all loved it!! it was hilarious at times! some of the funny stuff was more adult humor, but the kids still thought it was funny.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 15 year old
December 4, 2009
 
Hilarious almost must see movie
I highly recommend this movie to mostly all people. This movie has very good moral messages, for example, that family is important. Although, these values are not shown in the beginning of the movie where, for example, Robin WIlliams gets a tatoo.

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
November 25, 2009
 
I think that the movie was very good, My friend and I were laughing so hard. The premise of the movie was about friends sticking together and families being together.A scene were they're in the bar in Miami was suggestive, but not inappropriate. A few sad moments but mostly really funny.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 8 year old
November 29, 2009
 
Bleh - possibly the worst movie I've ever seen.
Honestly - this is one of the worst movies I have ever seen. Even my kids (ages 9 & 7), who love old dumb Disney movies (like That Darn Cat and Herbie) felt that this was boring. It was a ridiculously formulaic story, acted out badly, edited haphazardly and laced with brutal "comic" violence. Bleh. Please - learn from my mistake and DON'T spend any money on this junk!

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 13 and 16 year old
November 26, 2009
 
MY GIANT JOHN TRAVOLTA
John Travolta mentions that his kids haven't the first or second Friday the 13th! Not to mention! THOSE FILMS ARE BLOODY!!!! NOT RECOMMENDED FOR KIDS

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 10, 13, and 15 year old
March 11, 2010
 
Not offensive, but not really family values either.
Well, this isn't a great movie, but we saw it at the local discount theater and it entertained. My 8 and 12 year old loved all the humor involving balls flying into men's private parts, etc. They laughed hysterically through all of that kind of stuff. I enjoyed a few laughs myself, but I hesitate to really call it a "family show". In an effort to forget the pain of divorce, you get so drunk that you get married again to a girl you just met that night....Divorce her the next morning and then 8 years later discover that one night resulted in a pregnancy so now you have a child. Not really the family image I want to portray to my kids, so I don't really call it a "family show." It had some laughs and a predictable happy ending. I don't think my kids got a positive message from it, but I don't feel like they were "scarred for life" either. : )

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
January 5, 2011
 
I rate films based on three things: how I saw it as a (or with a) member of the target audience, how I saw it in a more technical aspect as a filmmaker (in-training!), and what my personal opinion as my (quite opinionated) self was. This film is marketed as a family comedy. As a teenager with a large family, I am part of the target audience. To help with the spectrum, I called in the opinions of a friend and her three children (ages 10, 8, and 4). The general consensus was that the film was entirely…nothing. Nondescript. It was yet another cheesy, feel-good, very slapstick family film that we've come to expect from Disney. It wasn't horrible, but it wasn't good by any stretch of the imagination. You'll probably leave the film having laughed a little, groaned a little, and then you will forget you saw it. In fact, it is so exactly like so many other Disney films that you might get just as much out of staring at a wall for 88 minutes and remembering those films as you would get watching this one. “Lame”, “stupid”, and “cliché” were the words this target audience used to describe it. As far as I know, none of my friends who watched the film care to see it ever again. Technically speaking, I was flummoxed. Why was this film made? There is nothing whatever outstanding or memorable, the “moral of the story” was obvious, everything was predictable, the plot was old news, the dialogue was forgettable, the characters were dull (and often out-of-character to fit into the story…which is bad, as you should never give up character for a story!), and what could have been seen as a nice dose of slapstick to a good script was reduced to the (very bad) attempt at a saving grace for a script that was completely boring. Currently, Disney is one of the wealthiest, most powerful companies in the world. That they wouldn’t bother to make a better film for the millions they influence is intolerable. They COULD have done so much better, especially with the talent they had cast. Instead, the main character straps on a working jetpack (which I admit can work in the right film. However, nothing before this scene even hinted that the world of the film would support anything so unlikely) and (as expected) falls smack in the middle of a conveniently-placed pool of water. Most of the actors seem to have tried their hardest, but the overall flavor was one of cheese, blandness, and wet dog. As me, a well-done family comedy is one of my favorite things to watch. This was not a well-done family comedy. Common Sense rates it suitable for ages 8+, and I have to agree. Impossibly enough, even while excluding the youngest age groups of children from the film by putting in adult content, they still seem to be trying to pander to the mentality of a two-year-old. What we are left with is an audacious sort of condescension towards the audience, all of whom the filmmakers seem to have decided are idiots. Yesterday, an 8-year-old I babysit for confessed that it made him angry that movies and TV acted like he was “stupid”, and that 5-year-olds could figure out most shows in two minutes without the endless explaining they shove in for the younger set. He pointed to his 4-year-old brother as evidence, exclaiming that people acted like all kids were dumb, but his brother understood perfectly (“and he’s just 4!”), so why did they dumb things down for kids his age? Herein lies what I (in my own opinion) see as the biggest problem with this film, and so many others like it. In trying to stoop down to the level of children, they deny them any challenge that could prepare them for real life, of any chance to grow, of any real lesson. In fact, the exposure to watered-down films can make a child just as watered-down. I know Disney is capable of making films that raise the bar. Instead, they chose to make “Old Dogs”. It could have been great. It was not. As far as I am concerned, no-one should watch this film.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 10 year old
November 25, 2009
 
Very funny don't miss it.
This is a very funny movie. The kids loved it as well as we did. Except for the alcohol, I thought this is one of the funniest movies coming to the big screen in a long time.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent
March 25, 2010
 
Older kids and teens will crack up, younger kids won't get the humor
Watched this for the 1st time last night and we laughed ourselves silly! There was no language that I recall (and I'm hypersensitive to that stuff in family movies) but lots of drinking, which I didn't care for at all. But it was so touching to see Travolta and Preston w/ their daughter Ella acting together after the loss of Jett. Yes, it's predictable, but I don't ever recall seeing Travolta play such a hysterically manic character. He stole it from Robin Williams, which is a feat! And don't even get me started on Rita Wilson's antics--my sides actually hurt from laughing at her facial expressions. Some comedy was cheesy but original (souvenirs made by Preston for her kids while on lock up were personalized license plates!). I'm ready to watch this again tonight to catch the stuff I missed, because the pace actually was too fast. Otherwise, it's a sweet and sappy sugar rush, a nice diversion for family night.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 9 year old
January 26, 2010
 
They shouldnt have scripted it in such a way that the dog dies. But then it was a good chance to remind the kids about loving for their pets.

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
March 11, 2010
 
It was horrible

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 17 year old
November 27, 2009
 
Not really...
Some funny parts but overall a bit of a disappointment. The message of the movie was a positive one, but really not one I would recommend seeing.

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
May 30, 2010
 
not too bad
It's not as bad a most reviewers say. There are some parts that are genuinely funny, especially when Robin Williams tries to play golf after mixing up his medication. It's worth a rental, and nothing bad in it for the kids.

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
May 6, 2010
 
I really wish so many movies didn't have so many Apple computers in the. Can you really think of any PG kids movie without an Apple computer in it that came out in 2010? Honestly... IT'S GETTING VERY IRRITATING!

Flag as inappropriate