About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

A safe community is important to us.
Please observe our guidelines.

All member reviews for Percy Jackson and the Olympians: The Lightning Thief

Parent of 13 year old
February 13, 2010
 
As a mother of a 10-year-old boy (huge fan of the series) and an elementray school Librarian (Have many fans... could hardly keep the books on the shelves!), this movie was a huge disaster! What a shame to have amazing material to work with and turn out such a lack-luster movie. The movie could stand alone from Rick Riordan's books - as the only commonality was the characters names. I sure hope that Mr. Riordan was paid well for the rights... because his hard work was definitely not rewarded by this movie. I strongly recommend reading the books and skipping this movie - or waiting until someone in Hollywood gets the message and makes a new movie actually based on the book!

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 9 and 13 year old
February 12, 2010
 
My 11 year old son and I LOVED the books and were so excited when we heard a movie was being made. We made it a special event to attend the midnight opening and waited in line to get our seats. We were so disappointed that the movie WAS NOTHING like the book! Too fast-paced in the beginnning, there was little time for character development. The kids were too old, key characters were left out, and the storyline was far off from Rick Riordan's witty, entertaining adventure. Intense monsters, mild language, and sexual innuendos make this a no-go for my 8 year old daughter who so desperately wants to see it. It's too bad they didn't stick to Riordans original story. 'That would have been a huge success. Those who have not read the series may enjoy the action-adventure and be entertained by the cg effects, but fans of the Percy Jackson series will be left feeling ripped-off and disheartened.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 5, 9, 10, and 12 year old
February 12, 2010
 
I have no idea why this movie was not rated PG-13. I took my daughter to this and Avatar in 3-D and saw no difference in the violence level. There were a lot more younger kids in the audience for Percy Jackson because of the PG rating. I took my 10 year old daughter to this because she is a fan of the books. There were a lot more inappropriate messages in this flick for kids her age than Avatar for sure. I was dissappointed. I have an 8 year old son who is trying to finish the book so I can take him - but I will not take him now due to the too graphic scenes. Yes, the special effects are well-done. The movie's story is just okay. It does not leave you with a positive feeling at the end of the movie like Avatar does - much better written story-line. My daughter liked the Lightning Thief book much better. This movie just makes me wonder who's establishing the ratings out there!

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 12 years old
January 2, 2011
 
It would actually make more sense if you dont read the books first...
It wasnt worth the two hours of my life. I'll actually be suprised if they make a second one. It might have been good if had seen the movie before I read the books, considering the storylines are COMPLETLEY different.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 9 year old
February 13, 2010
 
Perfect for 8 +-year-olds who are savvy of the fantasy film genre
As huge fans of the series (we've read them all!), our family went to the film opening yesterday. Our 8-year-old was really excited to see how book would be translated, and he was disappointed that some of his favorite scenes and aspects of the story had been changed; such as the decision to change the 5 days of gaming in the Lotus Club arcade to 5 days of debauchery that was shown in the movie (which was funny, but perhaps intended for a PG audience?). He was also disappointed that Grover's character had been altered significantly form the book series (in the series, he's a lovable, at times, awkward, satyr. he's not the smooth ladies-man-satyr shown in the film ... who is, a likable character, but intended for an older audience.) I gave it 4 stars because it is a very good film, but it's not really much like the book, which is excellent!

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 14 year old
March 14, 2010
 
Fine for older kids, but not for those under 13.
This movie definitely should have been rated PG-13! I took my 12 1/2 year old nephew to see it, as he has read all of the books in the Percy Jackson series. Not only did he agree that it should have been a PG-13 movie (and he has seen all of the Harry Potter movies), but he also did not think it was nearly as good as the book. He thought the special effects were very cool. My 10 year old son just finished reading the book, but I will NOT be taking him to see this movie. Its portrayal of women was offensive (most of the women are portrayed as sex symbols) and the scene at the casino in Vegas was entirely inappropriate for children 12 and under.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 11 year old
March 15, 2010
 
Percy skips Junior High and goes straight to High School
I was so disappointed!My daughter and I both read the books together and I had hoped that since Chris Columbus would be truer to the book (he did the first Harry Potter movie without advancing the childrens' ages). We were expecting the violence--come on!--they were fighting monsters all the time in the book! And Gabe was a jerk in the book too. But I was mostly disappointed in the themes that were in the movie that were not present in the books--all the sexual innuendo, especially with Persephone! Even the physical tension with Percy and Annabeth was really amped up. There were good and bad role models; I did like the strong Annabeth but Grover was very disappointing. I wish I had previewed this movie before taking my daughter.

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 12 years old
July 20, 2010
 
A Disappointment
First off, if you have read the books, the movie is going to be a total disappointment. The characters were warped- and the most noticeable way was their ages. Percy and Annabeth were supposed to be 12, and the actress for Annabeth was 24. They were all 16 or so, and they could drive. Grover was supposed to be a timid, shy satyr, but he was a lady loving popular person, and it demonstrated bad roll models in the way he was acting for younger children. The story was different, so that Luke was the bad guy, when he should have been good- in a way. The way it was set up was too easy for the characters, yes, they saved the world, but it made them look so stupid and helpless. There were many characters and scenes deleted, such as Clarisse, daughter of Ares, Ares himself, the waterbed scene, the water park scene, and the Oracle.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 15 years old
January 8, 2011
 
book is better
they did a terrible job following the book

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 9 year old
March 16, 2010
 
Way too scary for preteens. Should be rated PG13
It is outrageous that this is rated PG. It should be PG-13. It is geared more to teenagers, not to the age of children who are most likely to be reading the book. It scared the daylights out of my 8-year-old--he still won't go upstairs or downstairs alone since he's seen it. The Medusa and Hades scenes are just too much for children under 13.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 15 years old
August 1, 2010
 
If you read the books don't bother watching it!
....Ok first off if you read the books DO NOT watch the movie the plot line was off the movie was just way off the book...I saw this for my b-day because I loved the books sooooooooo much but ugh it was stupid. I have one word for it FAIL!

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 8 year old
March 14, 2010
 
PG? no way.
I really regret not checking Common Semse Media prior to our first movie outing in months. huge mistake & we had to leave after one hour as it was just TOO MUCH for our almost seven-year-old to be exposed to, despite a PG rating. a rating has never been so meaningless to me before this film. What a waste of $31.50 (plus popcorn).

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 14 years old
November 24, 2010
 
Good, but not as good as the book
I liked the movie on it's own, but not based on the book. I really think it would have been better if it had a different name than the book, and possibly even different characters. I was a little disappointed that the characters weren't 12 and Clarisse and Ares weren't in it. If they make a 2nd one, they'll have to completely introduce Clarisse because she is one of the main parts. I don't think the movie was bad, just a little different. I would recommend the book a little more, but i still recommend the movie.

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 13 years old
July 28, 2010
 
READ THE BOOK!!!!!!!! [but dont watch the movie]
either read the book or see the movie. if you read the book you will absolutly hate the movie. besides the plot and the characters names they have nothing in common. the ages are all wrong they went from 12 to 17. grover is supposed to be shy little satyr not a popular ladys man. not to mention all the stuff they left out. if i had never read the book [im glad i did] i would sive this movie 4 stars. and a message to rick riordan: keep up the good work in your new series. RICK RIORDAN IS AWESOME!!!!!!!!!!

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
July 14, 2010
 
A big disappointment, could have been a five star movie
really, really bad. NOT LIKE the book in ANY way whatsoever, except for the characters' names. percy's poor? oh well, that's funny - he has an iPod touch, plus his stepfather has a sports car. bad plotline, acting, and screenplay. bad in general, could have been AMAZING. try again, please!

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 16 years old
August 9, 2010
 
absolute failure to follow book
i am a HUGE fan of the books, and i was disappointed by the fact that the movie changed it to where it was almost nothing like the PJO i know and love. the failure to mention the great prophecy and thalia, and the fact that percy is older than 16 kills all hope that if movies are made for the rest of the books, they might be like the books. if you haven't read the book, the movie is great! if have, (and you should) it sucks out loud.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 14 years old
February 12, 2010
 
One who hasn't read the book will enjoy it more then one who has (explains why in the review; CONTAINS SPOILERS!!)
The Lightning Thief review: Violence- LOTS for a PG. Expect no shooting, but lots of swordplay and scary monsters. The minotaur scene wasn't as violent as I predicted, but the scene with Medusa was lengthy and definitely one of the scariest parts of the movie. If you have any mature 8 year olds or younger, that part will most likely scare them. A teacher changes into a Fury, and picks up Percy, which contains some scariness. Many monsters including one with like 7 heads and then it grows 2 more. Oh, I forgot to mention, in the Medusa scene, they end up cutting her head off and taking it with them. Yeah, so I think you get the point on the violence. Sex: Some flirting between Anabeth and Percy, and in the end they kiss. Peresphone sees Grover in the Underworld and shows obvious love for them. Grover makes some sexual remarks. All of this will go over kids head's though, so no need to worry; but the part in the casino is fairly explicit. Language: H**l, A**, g*d in a bad way, and D**M. Drinking - The biggest part is definetly in the Lotus Hotel and Casino. They eat these flowers which make them not want to leave and party all night. There is drinking in the casino, and it's obvious the kids gamble. A guy in there seemed to be addicted to the video game he was playing. Gabe (Percy's step dad) always asks for a beer and orders the mother around. Overall- I honestly think if you have read the book and you go with a friend who hasn't, the friend will love the movie and you will be disappointed. I went with 2 friends, one has read the book ,and one who hasn't. You can guess who liked it and who didn't enjoy it as much. I have read all the books, and I admit I was disappointed, but still, with an ABSOLUTELY AMAZING book, you have a pretty good movie. Let me say why this is true (about people liking it). In the movie, they left out Ares and his daughter, Clarisse. They have almost the most important parts in the movie! The actors miserably failed to capture Rick Riordan's astonishing characters.You see, one who hasn't read the book won't notice these problems, and without them, it's a great movie! If the movie was like the book, I would give it 9,999,999,999 out of 5 stars. Yes the book is that amazing and the special affects in the movie could have made it ABSOULETLY FANTASTICLY ASTONISHINGLY FABULOUS! Overall, you need to read the book first to understand it, but you can still enjoy it without reading. Can't wait for "The Sea of Monsters" to hit theaters in 2012! Age group- mature 7 year olds and up. (the reason I said this was in the theater, I saw a little girl probably 5, crying and constantly telling her dad she was scared.) I know this review was immensly long (my longest yet), but I really hope it helped you figure out if you and your family shall see "Percy Jackson and the Olympians: The Lightning Thief".

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
February 12, 2010
 
not worth it!
it is not worth the money spent to go see it. they messed up........ big time! like i said, don't even waste your time! the graphics were awesome but they forgot/altered more than 90% of it. i started crying because they messaed it up. it is really not worth it!

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 12 year old
February 14, 2010
 
If New to the Series you will like, Fans will be dissappointed
Well if you or your children are fans of the books then you might just want to skip the movie. My boys were excited to see this movie & had devoured the books. They & I couldn't believe how they changed this story. They neglected to include many important details that role into the rest of the books & totally forgot to introduce many of the characters. Gone were the pictures of Camp Half Blood being like any other camp until you looked closer. There wasn't a sign of anyone in the bright orange Camp Half-Blood t-shirts but adults wearing grecian togas. It felt as if the screen writer didn't even bother to read the story before he wrote the script. It felt as if the director was more interested in the action sequences then the actual story of friendship that developes between the 3 main characters & how Annabeth deals with her conflicted feelings. By the way Annabeth's invisibility cap is MIA in the film. With such a star studded cast & a story that had endless possibilities this movie failed painfully. If the rumors are true & they are planing to do more I hope that they take the time to be more faithful to the story. Sure liberties will be taken & somethings will have to be cut but this film failed to explain the "Mist" & never once mentioned the prophecy regarding a child of the big 3. Thus making me feel as if they are already planning on dropping this series after the 1st movie. Sorry to hear as they had the makings of something as amazing as Harry Potter had they wanted it to be that way.

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 12 years old
January 12, 2011
 
This movie is on for 11+
I love this moive it is really good. There are points where i was a little scared like there is madusa she is kind of frecky. There is a little too much swering. But the main charater has ADHD and dyslexia and he facing those problems.

Flag as inappropriate