About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

A safe community is important to us.
Please observe our guidelines.

All parent reviews for Percy Jackson and the Olympians: The Lightning Thief

Age
10
Average rating based on 108 parent reviews:
  • 40% say violence is an issue
  • 27% say language is an issue
Parent of 13 year old
February 13, 2010
 
As a mother of a 10-year-old boy (huge fan of the series) and an elementray school Librarian (Have many fans... could hardly keep the books on the shelves!), this movie was a huge disaster! What a shame to have amazing material to work with and turn out such a lack-luster movie. The movie could stand alone from Rick Riordan's books - as the only commonality was the characters names. I sure hope that Mr. Riordan was paid well for the rights... because his hard work was definitely not rewarded by this movie. I strongly recommend reading the books and skipping this movie - or waiting until someone in Hollywood gets the message and makes a new movie actually based on the book!

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 9 and 13 year old
February 12, 2010
 
My 11 year old son and I LOVED the books and were so excited when we heard a movie was being made. We made it a special event to attend the midnight opening and waited in line to get our seats. We were so disappointed that the movie WAS NOTHING like the book! Too fast-paced in the beginnning, there was little time for character development. The kids were too old, key characters were left out, and the storyline was far off from Rick Riordan's witty, entertaining adventure. Intense monsters, mild language, and sexual innuendos make this a no-go for my 8 year old daughter who so desperately wants to see it. It's too bad they didn't stick to Riordans original story. 'That would have been a huge success. Those who have not read the series may enjoy the action-adventure and be entertained by the cg effects, but fans of the Percy Jackson series will be left feeling ripped-off and disheartened.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 5, 9, 10, and 12 year old
February 12, 2010
 
I have no idea why this movie was not rated PG-13. I took my daughter to this and Avatar in 3-D and saw no difference in the violence level. There were a lot more younger kids in the audience for Percy Jackson because of the PG rating. I took my 10 year old daughter to this because she is a fan of the books. There were a lot more inappropriate messages in this flick for kids her age than Avatar for sure. I was dissappointed. I have an 8 year old son who is trying to finish the book so I can take him - but I will not take him now due to the too graphic scenes. Yes, the special effects are well-done. The movie's story is just okay. It does not leave you with a positive feeling at the end of the movie like Avatar does - much better written story-line. My daughter liked the Lightning Thief book much better. This movie just makes me wonder who's establishing the ratings out there!

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 9 year old
February 13, 2010
 
Perfect for 8 +-year-olds who are savvy of the fantasy film genre
As huge fans of the series (we've read them all!), our family went to the film opening yesterday. Our 8-year-old was really excited to see how book would be translated, and he was disappointed that some of his favorite scenes and aspects of the story had been changed; such as the decision to change the 5 days of gaming in the Lotus Club arcade to 5 days of debauchery that was shown in the movie (which was funny, but perhaps intended for a PG audience?). He was also disappointed that Grover's character had been altered significantly form the book series (in the series, he's a lovable, at times, awkward, satyr. he's not the smooth ladies-man-satyr shown in the film ... who is, a likable character, but intended for an older audience.) I gave it 4 stars because it is a very good film, but it's not really much like the book, which is excellent!

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 14 year old
March 14, 2010
 
Fine for older kids, but not for those under 13.
This movie definitely should have been rated PG-13! I took my 12 1/2 year old nephew to see it, as he has read all of the books in the Percy Jackson series. Not only did he agree that it should have been a PG-13 movie (and he has seen all of the Harry Potter movies), but he also did not think it was nearly as good as the book. He thought the special effects were very cool. My 10 year old son just finished reading the book, but I will NOT be taking him to see this movie. Its portrayal of women was offensive (most of the women are portrayed as sex symbols) and the scene at the casino in Vegas was entirely inappropriate for children 12 and under.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 11 year old
March 15, 2010
 
Percy skips Junior High and goes straight to High School
I was so disappointed!My daughter and I both read the books together and I had hoped that since Chris Columbus would be truer to the book (he did the first Harry Potter movie without advancing the childrens' ages). We were expecting the violence--come on!--they were fighting monsters all the time in the book! And Gabe was a jerk in the book too. But I was mostly disappointed in the themes that were in the movie that were not present in the books--all the sexual innuendo, especially with Persephone! Even the physical tension with Percy and Annabeth was really amped up. There were good and bad role models; I did like the strong Annabeth but Grover was very disappointing. I wish I had previewed this movie before taking my daughter.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 9 year old
March 16, 2010
 
Way too scary for preteens. Should be rated PG13
It is outrageous that this is rated PG. It should be PG-13. It is geared more to teenagers, not to the age of children who are most likely to be reading the book. It scared the daylights out of my 8-year-old--he still won't go upstairs or downstairs alone since he's seen it. The Medusa and Hades scenes are just too much for children under 13.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 8 year old
March 14, 2010
 
PG? no way.
I really regret not checking Common Semse Media prior to our first movie outing in months. huge mistake & we had to leave after one hour as it was just TOO MUCH for our almost seven-year-old to be exposed to, despite a PG rating. a rating has never been so meaningless to me before this film. What a waste of $31.50 (plus popcorn).

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 12 year old
February 14, 2010
 
If New to the Series you will like, Fans will be dissappointed
Well if you or your children are fans of the books then you might just want to skip the movie. My boys were excited to see this movie & had devoured the books. They & I couldn't believe how they changed this story. They neglected to include many important details that role into the rest of the books & totally forgot to introduce many of the characters. Gone were the pictures of Camp Half Blood being like any other camp until you looked closer. There wasn't a sign of anyone in the bright orange Camp Half-Blood t-shirts but adults wearing grecian togas. It felt as if the screen writer didn't even bother to read the story before he wrote the script. It felt as if the director was more interested in the action sequences then the actual story of friendship that developes between the 3 main characters & how Annabeth deals with her conflicted feelings. By the way Annabeth's invisibility cap is MIA in the film. With such a star studded cast & a story that had endless possibilities this movie failed painfully. If the rumors are true & they are planing to do more I hope that they take the time to be more faithful to the story. Sure liberties will be taken & somethings will have to be cut but this film failed to explain the "Mist" & never once mentioned the prophecy regarding a child of the big 3. Thus making me feel as if they are already planning on dropping this series after the 1st movie. Sorry to hear as they had the makings of something as amazing as Harry Potter had they wanted it to be that way.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 13 year old
February 15, 2010
 
Sadly inappropriate for kids
This movie was a stunning disappointment because it hijacked a children's story and twisted it into something, not only unrecognizable, but age inappropriate for the books intended audience. One scene depicts Grover surrounded by a group of scantily clad, obviously much older women who are vying for his attention. Persephone is depicted as a sexual toy for Hades who is wanting to seduce Grover.

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
February 14, 2010
 
Not for young kids at all!!!
Not having read the books, I had no complaints with the changing of the story (I didn't even know about that until looking at these reviews). What I couldn't believe is that it was a PG rated movie. The monsters, such at the Fury, Medusa with her snakes, and Hades, were incredibly scary looking and the fight sequences too intense for small children. The sexual suggestive comments were also inappropriate for the age targeted. Persephone, "I've never had a satyr... (long, suggestive pause as she looks Grover up and down with a leer) ...as a visitor." It is incredible to believe that this movie shared a rating with "UP" or "Night at the Museum".

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 6 year old
January 9, 2011
 
Good Movie... Good Book... But they have very little to do with each other...
This is a great movie but if you're looking for an adaptation of the book then you may not want to see this movie. It makes a good fanfic but is so loosely based on the book that fans will more than likely be disappointed. I know I was. It's more like "A movie, based on the title of the book". The movie itself is entertaining as long as you aren't banging your head against the wall going "That didn't happen in the book" every few minutes. There's a few times "ass" is said. Percy is a little older but I found that to be the least annoying of the differences. If there is a second movie made I would hope they learn their lesson and stick to events that actually happen in the book.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 14 year old
February 16, 2010
 
Don't read the books before you see the film!
Having read the books with my 12 year old son, we were greatly disappointed that so much of the movie was changed. Percy was too old, Annabeth was a combo of herself and Clarisse(Ares daughter), who didn't even appear in the movie. The character of Percy was too confident, and accepted by the others too easily. They changed the character of Grover as well. Persephone was too vampy, as was Medusa. They spent the movie chasing pearls that were a gift in the book. Ares was the one who stole the bolt, not Luke. I could go on and on. I knew they'd change some stuff, but this was a train wreck. All the humor and adventure that we loved in the book was flat out destroyed. Too bad, they could have had a Harry Potter like series if they'd stayed true to the story.

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
February 12, 2010
 
Differences From the Book, But Still Enjoyable
A lot of the buzz I've seen at many sites across the board have said that if you've read the books, you will *hate* the movie, conversely, if you haven't read the book you will like the movie. I *did* read the books and I *did* like the movie. They *clearly* changed some *very* key plot elements/characters, and, as a fan of the books, I was acutely aware of the deviations. I was extremely unhappy with the choice to add profanity that did not exist in the book & "sex" up the movie to appeal to older viewers. That aside, I wouldn't trash the movie completely. There were a couple of things I think that the movie actually did *better* than the books (the way they actually entered the underworld, for example). Thus, prepare yourself that it will *not* be completely faithful to the book. But neither was "Gone With the Wind" (Scarlett had 3 children in the book!), and that was one of the best movies ever. No, "The Lightning Thief" is not in the same class as "Gone With the Wind," but the point is, it had enough in it to satisfy me as an avid fan of the books, yet I could also appreciate it from a cinematic perspective.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 4, 8, and 10 year old
December 3, 2010
 
Appropriate for 13 and above - not tweens or younger.
The graphic are much too scary for under 13, the language leaves much to be desired and the role models are lacking. They should have stayed closer to the original story line. Disappointing.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 7, 9, and 11 year old
July 7, 2010
 
nothing like the book!!!
The movie was nothing like the book leaving all percy jackson fans disappointed. It was okay, if you didn't read the books. P.S. How are the gonna make a sequel? THe tookaly messed it all up!!

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 11 year old
March 8, 2010
 
Aging the main characters from what's in the book a disappointment
As an adult, I found the early part of the movie to be devoid of interest or suspense. Chris Columbus really got it off on slow footing. I was also terribly disappointed that the innocent fun of the books was "sexed up" for an older film-going audience by making the three main protagonists (who were 12 in the book) into teens of about 16. There was no Grover oggling women in the book. What the heck was the point of that? And I also found it offensive that this character, played by a black man, ended up in a classic minstrel role, not unlike Eddie Murphy as the Donkey in Shrek. Smart alec comments and comic relief. In an otherwise mostly white production. (As if New York city were that monotone!)

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 3, 4, 7, 9, 11, and 15 year old
March 6, 2010
 
Questionable PG rating
NOT for younger children... violence and scary creatures... we will not be bringing our 6 & 8 year olds.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 9 and 13 year old
February 26, 2010
 
My eight year old asked to be taken to the lobby while my 11/12 year old stayed and loved it. The creatures are too realistic and creepy/violent for the younger crowd.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 7 and 9 year old
August 31, 2010
 
Good movie for tweens and up if you like Fantasy.
We watched this as a family, and our 5 yr old was frightened of the mythical monsters...the fury & the medusa's head especially. Our 8 yr old was nervous, but was able to handle the movie much better. He thought it was more violent than Star Wars, and they've seen all but the third episode (the one where Anakin becomes Darth Vader). I enjoyed the movie, but then I've always been a fan of Fantasy movies and mythical creatures. It was probably a poor choice to watch with the kids without previewing it first.

Flag as inappropriate