About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

A safe community is important to us.
Please observe our guidelines.

All teen and kid reviews for Percy Jackson and the Olympians: The Lightning Thief

Age
10
Average rating based on 285 kid and teen reviews:
  • 51% say violence is an issue
  • 38% say there are positive role models
  • 36% say language is an issue
  • 26% say sexual content is an issue
Kid, 12 years old
January 2, 2011
 
It would actually make more sense if you dont read the books first...
It wasnt worth the two hours of my life. I'll actually be suprised if they make a second one. It might have been good if had seen the movie before I read the books, considering the storylines are COMPLETLEY different.

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 12 years old
July 20, 2010
 
A Disappointment
First off, if you have read the books, the movie is going to be a total disappointment. The characters were warped- and the most noticeable way was their ages. Percy and Annabeth were supposed to be 12, and the actress for Annabeth was 24. They were all 16 or so, and they could drive. Grover was supposed to be a timid, shy satyr, but he was a lady loving popular person, and it demonstrated bad roll models in the way he was acting for younger children. The story was different, so that Luke was the bad guy, when he should have been good- in a way. The way it was set up was too easy for the characters, yes, they saved the world, but it made them look so stupid and helpless. There were many characters and scenes deleted, such as Clarisse, daughter of Ares, Ares himself, the waterbed scene, the water park scene, and the Oracle.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 15 years old
January 8, 2011
 
book is better
they did a terrible job following the book

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 15 years old
August 1, 2010
 
If you read the books don't bother watching it!
....Ok first off if you read the books DO NOT watch the movie the plot line was off the movie was just way off the book...I saw this for my b-day because I loved the books sooooooooo much but ugh it was stupid. I have one word for it FAIL!

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 14 years old
November 24, 2010
 
Good, but not as good as the book
I liked the movie on it's own, but not based on the book. I really think it would have been better if it had a different name than the book, and possibly even different characters. I was a little disappointed that the characters weren't 12 and Clarisse and Ares weren't in it. If they make a 2nd one, they'll have to completely introduce Clarisse because she is one of the main parts. I don't think the movie was bad, just a little different. I would recommend the book a little more, but i still recommend the movie.

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 13 years old
July 28, 2010
 
READ THE BOOK!!!!!!!! [but dont watch the movie]
either read the book or see the movie. if you read the book you will absolutly hate the movie. besides the plot and the characters names they have nothing in common. the ages are all wrong they went from 12 to 17. grover is supposed to be shy little satyr not a popular ladys man. not to mention all the stuff they left out. if i had never read the book [im glad i did] i would sive this movie 4 stars. and a message to rick riordan: keep up the good work in your new series. RICK RIORDAN IS AWESOME!!!!!!!!!!

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
July 14, 2010
 
A big disappointment, could have been a five star movie
really, really bad. NOT LIKE the book in ANY way whatsoever, except for the characters' names. percy's poor? oh well, that's funny - he has an iPod touch, plus his stepfather has a sports car. bad plotline, acting, and screenplay. bad in general, could have been AMAZING. try again, please!

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 16 years old
August 9, 2010
 
absolute failure to follow book
i am a HUGE fan of the books, and i was disappointed by the fact that the movie changed it to where it was almost nothing like the PJO i know and love. the failure to mention the great prophecy and thalia, and the fact that percy is older than 16 kills all hope that if movies are made for the rest of the books, they might be like the books. if you haven't read the book, the movie is great! if have, (and you should) it sucks out loud.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 14 years old
February 12, 2010
 
One who hasn't read the book will enjoy it more then one who has (explains why in the review; CONTAINS SPOILERS!!)
The Lightning Thief review: Violence- LOTS for a PG. Expect no shooting, but lots of swordplay and scary monsters. The minotaur scene wasn't as violent as I predicted, but the scene with Medusa was lengthy and definitely one of the scariest parts of the movie. If you have any mature 8 year olds or younger, that part will most likely scare them. A teacher changes into a Fury, and picks up Percy, which contains some scariness. Many monsters including one with like 7 heads and then it grows 2 more. Oh, I forgot to mention, in the Medusa scene, they end up cutting her head off and taking it with them. Yeah, so I think you get the point on the violence. Sex: Some flirting between Anabeth and Percy, and in the end they kiss. Peresphone sees Grover in the Underworld and shows obvious love for them. Grover makes some sexual remarks. All of this will go over kids head's though, so no need to worry; but the part in the casino is fairly explicit. Language: H**l, A**, g*d in a bad way, and D**M. Drinking - The biggest part is definetly in the Lotus Hotel and Casino. They eat these flowers which make them not want to leave and party all night. There is drinking in the casino, and it's obvious the kids gamble. A guy in there seemed to be addicted to the video game he was playing. Gabe (Percy's step dad) always asks for a beer and orders the mother around. Overall- I honestly think if you have read the book and you go with a friend who hasn't, the friend will love the movie and you will be disappointed. I went with 2 friends, one has read the book ,and one who hasn't. You can guess who liked it and who didn't enjoy it as much. I have read all the books, and I admit I was disappointed, but still, with an ABSOLUTELY AMAZING book, you have a pretty good movie. Let me say why this is true (about people liking it). In the movie, they left out Ares and his daughter, Clarisse. They have almost the most important parts in the movie! The actors miserably failed to capture Rick Riordan's astonishing characters.You see, one who hasn't read the book won't notice these problems, and without them, it's a great movie! If the movie was like the book, I would give it 9,999,999,999 out of 5 stars. Yes the book is that amazing and the special affects in the movie could have made it ABSOULETLY FANTASTICLY ASTONISHINGLY FABULOUS! Overall, you need to read the book first to understand it, but you can still enjoy it without reading. Can't wait for "The Sea of Monsters" to hit theaters in 2012! Age group- mature 7 year olds and up. (the reason I said this was in the theater, I saw a little girl probably 5, crying and constantly telling her dad she was scared.) I know this review was immensly long (my longest yet), but I really hope it helped you figure out if you and your family shall see "Percy Jackson and the Olympians: The Lightning Thief".

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
February 12, 2010
 
not worth it!
it is not worth the money spent to go see it. they messed up........ big time! like i said, don't even waste your time! the graphics were awesome but they forgot/altered more than 90% of it. i started crying because they messaed it up. it is really not worth it!

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 12 years old
January 12, 2011
 
This movie is on for 11+
I love this moive it is really good. There are points where i was a little scared like there is madusa she is kind of frecky. There is a little too much swering. But the main charater has ADHD and dyslexia and he facing those problems.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 16 years old
January 14, 2011
 
seriouly
first of not at all scary,hardly any violent. and also me and my dad and 13 year old cousin hated the movie. we all 3 read the books.so people who have read will probably not like the movie.they changed it way too much and they didnt have clarisse in it which made me mad.but my nana who didnt read the books liked it.so if u havent read the books then you might like it.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
March 22, 2010
 
The gods are angry...and so am I.
It was okay, I guess...but it didn't follow the book at all! If you read the book, you'll be dissapointed because many important things were missing. Every time Grover had the chance, he would flirt with the girls, there were scenes that might be a little scary for younger kids, and then there was the part where they were drugged with the 'Lotus Flower'. And they cuss almost every sentence. My advice? Go to your nearset bookstore and pick up the first Percy Jackson and the Olympians book -which IS appropriate for younger kids.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 14 years old
July 1, 2010
 
I liked the movie, but it was a TERIIBLE refrence to the book, and did not stay true to the story Rick Riordan wrote. They made the movie seem scarier than the book, and substituted some scenes. Percy and the gang are no longer 12, but 17, in high school. They exchanged the Chimera for the Hydra, no Waterland, or DOA Recording Studios, and Ares had a very, very minor part. Kronos wasn't even mentioned. They just said that Luke resented the Olympians and want to tear Olympus down. Mrs. Dodds freaked even my mom out! There is violence, like severing heads and battles. There are a few cuss words, but it isn't too bad. They also played "Highway to H***" as a song. There are many scary images, such as Hades, Medusa, and the Hydra. The gang also enters the Lotus Casino, which is more mature that mentioned in the book. And, in this case, Grover is a huge "ladies man," constantly flirting with girls. If you wouldn't want to see the images in your head of the characters and setings destroyed, I would pass. This film does not appeal to a younger audience.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 14 years old
April 26, 2010
 
The Book is better
the book is better then the movie the movie goes way to fast. It is really good though. Hades wife Peresephone wears sexy clothing and makes-out with her husband in front of percy,annabeth,grover, and percy's mom.

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 11 years old
April 6, 2011
 
I have read all of the books, and the books are way way better than this suckie movie. I saw the movie first and then read the books, so for the first 3 books I was always seeing the charters the way they looked in the movie not how the arther described them. They leave out alot of important details and scenes in the movie, but usually books are slot better than the movie.I saw the movie when I was 9 and I was surprised by how much they cussed but kids hear way worse at school. But the sex was a big issue, Persephone's dress was way to low cut and she kisses Hades with open lips. At the Casino alot of the ladies dresses are to low cut so that is something to watch out for. Gabe seems drunk most of the time, and is very rude to Percy's mom. There is alot of violence and blood. If u haven't read the books u might like it.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 16 years old
March 29, 2011
 
Great special effects, could have done without the sex and gambling
I've never read the books, so I can't compare the movie. When this movie came out last summer I really liked it and watched it over and over again with my 5 and 11 year old sisters. Only recently did I realize that the movie really isn't the most appropriate thing for a 5 year old to be watching, even if it is only PG. However, I think Common Sense's rating of 11+ could be a bit lower. Some of the monsters are real-looking and definitely scary (the Fury, Hades as a demon) others are more fake-looking but still creepy (Medusa). The part where the Minotaur takes Percy's mom might disturb young viewers. There are many battles throughout the movie, climaxing with Luke and Percy's fight for the lightning bolt near the end, that are exciting but somewhat violent (but without much gory bloodshed). I'm not so much concerned about this kind of fantasy violence as I am about the other issues in this movie. I'm sure a lot of it will go over kids' heads, but still, are today's children's moviemakers really this perverted? Persephone and many other women characters wear very low-cut dresses, Gabe drinks and is disrespectful to Percy's mom and Grover flirts with girls. Also, Persephone "shows off" to Grover in a hooker-type way. The part that takes place in the casino is just inappropriate; kids should not see other kids eating drugged lotus flowers and gambling. Overall a so-so movie that could have been a lot better, with the iffy content overpowering positive messages.

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 13 years old
March 20, 2011
 
Don't watch;NOT WORTH THE ENERGY.
For once, Common Sense reviewed something accurately. The entire thing IS exactly like a gory episeode of Dora the Explorer. I personally hope they don't adapt the others into movies. This was just an hour and fifty-nine minutes of crap. NOTHING was the way it was supposed to be;they stressed the stupid pearls way too much when in the book they were just gifts. They made Annabeth look stupid by combining her with Clarisse. Clarisse is just too major a character in the books, if they plan to do the sequels they'll have to fix that huge mistake. The plot was pointless, the dialogue was cheap, they added swearing and Persephone, and my biggest problem was that THEY WEREN'T SUPPOSED TO BE TEENS!!!!!! It took away huge perks. I hated it.

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 11 years old
February 14, 2011
 
Well......
It is a bad movie compared 2 the book . Some concerns would be that alot of the girls outfits are not very modest they cuss some but overall most of the people are positive role models. It is am educationall movie, but the books have way more facts. If u haven't read the books don't basecthe books on the movie.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 16 years old
May 13, 2010
 
Good Movie for ages 8+
This movie was filled with action and humor. It may be nothing like the book, but it was definitely entertaining. :)

Flag as inappropriate