Priest

 Review

Common Sense Media says

Sci-fi vampire tale has weak characters, heavy violence.
greenON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
yellowPAUSE: Know your child; some content
may not be right for some kids.
redOFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
not for kidsNOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids any age.

Find out more

Quality
 
Sometimes media can be age appropriate but a real waste of time. Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Parents say

Kids say

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that this comic book-based sci-fi vampire story has strong fantasy violence, especially in the graphically gory animated title sequence; it also has monster attacks, fighting, and weapons. The movie crams together bits and pieces of vampire lore, bleak futuristic imagery, and Western elements, as well as a negative attitude toward too-powerful organized religion. There's some brief sexual innuendo and one use of "f--k," though language in general is infrequent.

  • The movie's futuristic world as a whole is so depressing that kids are unlikely to come away with much hope. However, the main character doesn't really exhibit much problematic behavior; he appears to be a loner, but he does successfully team up with others, and together they manage to solve a large problem. But he's forced to disobey his superiors to rescue a family member and to help save humanity. The movie also takes a dismal view of powerful organized religion.
  • The main character is a priest and a vampire killer; while he's brave, resourceful, and responsible and works well with others, he's also very dour and depressed. He has trouble clinging to his faith, and he occasionally seems tempted by worldly pleasures, though he never succumbs.
  • Strong fantasy violence, with monster and vampire attacks, fighting, explosions, guns and shooting, knives and stabbing, plus other fantasy-type weapons. While the blood in most of the movie isn't overwhelming, an animated title sequence features extremely heavy gore. Plus, a vampire attacks a human and sucks his blood dry (he leaves the human with some white foam coming out of his mouth). And in another scene, a vampire seemingly pulls a man's heart out of his chest.
  • Some slight sexual innuendo. A teen girl returns from "town" with the top button of her dress undone. Other characters discreetly discuss possible sexual encounters that may have occurred in the past.

What's the story?

Many years ago, a man known only as Priest (Paul Bettany) and others like him fought a war against a race of faceless vampires. Now that war is over, and the priests are having a hard time fitting in ... until a new band of vampires attacks and kidnaps a member of the Priest's family. Along with the cowboy-like Hicks (Cam Gigandet) and one of his former colleagues (Maggie Q), Priest heads out into the wastelands beyond the dark, ruined cities to find clues. Unfortunately, it looks as though Priest's brutal past is about to catch up with him in the form of a new breed of vampire. Can he pull off the rescue and stop the new vampire attack?


Is it any good?

 

With PRIEST, former special effects man-turned-director Scott Stewart produces a movie much like his feature debut, Legion: It's great-looking but lifeless. The premise is an interesting combination of a post-apocalyptic sci-fi movie, vampire lore, and the American West, and it cooks up dazzling landscapes and sets that deserve comparison to Blade Runner. But after that, the movie simply borrows ideas without much joy or enthusiasm.

The dour, depressing, wooden characters don't help much. Not even memorable cult actors like Brad Dourif, Steven Moyer (of TV's True Blood) or Madchen Amick (formerly of Twin Peaks) can help. Nobody appears to be having much fun. The scary moments are old hat, and the fight scenes are gray and choppy and don't generate much excitement. Fans of the comic book by Hyung Min-woo would probably do better to stick to the printed page.


Sign Up Message
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
Each week we send a customized newsletter to our parent and teen subscribers. Parents can customize their settings to receive recommendations and parent tips based on their kids’ ages. Teens receive a version just for them with the latest reviews and top picks for movies, video games, apps, music, books, and more.
Please enter an email address.
Please check your email address for possible typos.
Sorry, you must be 13 or older to subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Sign me up!

What families can talk about

  • Families can talk about the movie's violence. How did it affect you? Do you think all of it was necessary to the story? How does it compare to movies with more gore and blood? Which do you find scarier?

  • How does this movie compare to other vampire movies and TV shows? Why do you think vampires are so popular? Why do you think some are so much more violent than others?


This review was written by Jeffrey M. Anderson
Teen, 16 years old
May 14, 2011
 
i thought it was going to be better than this
What to watch out for * Messages: The movie's futuristic world as a whole is so depressing that kids are unlikely to come away with much hope. However, the main character doesn't really exhibit much problematic behavior; he appears to be a loner, but he does successfully team up with others, and together they manage to solve a large problem. But he's forced to disobey his superiors to rescue a family member and to help save humanity. The movie also takes a dismal view of powerful organized religion. * Role models: The main character is a priest and a vampire killer; while he's brave, resourceful, and responsible and works well with others, he's also very dour and depressed. He has trouble clinging to his faith, and he occasionally seems tempted by worldly pleasures, though he never succumbs. * Violence: Strong fantasy violence, with monster and vampire attacks, fighting, explosions, guns and shooting, knives and stabbing, plus other fantasy-type weapons. While the blood in most of the movie isn't overwhelming, an animated title sequence features extremely heavy gore. Plus, a vampire attacks a human and sucks his blood dry (he leaves the human with some white foam coming out of his mouth). And in another scene, a vampire seemingly pulls a man's heart out of his chest. * Sex: Some slight sexual innuendo. A teen girl returns from "town" with the top button of her dress undone. Other characters discreetly discuss possible sexual encounters that may have occurred in the past. * Language: "F--k" is heard once; other language is also infrequent but includes "s--t," "godd--n," "son of a bi-ch," and "h--l." * Consumerism: Not an issue. * Drinking, drugs, & smoking: Not an issue.

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
May 21, 2011
 
priest is a good action movie but parents you need to know that priest has a lot of Strong fantasy violence and some strong language used.

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
May 29, 2011
 
an awful mess.
1.5/5 Priest, a western-fused post-apocalyptic thriller, is set in an alternate world -- one ravaged by centuries of war between man and vampires. The story revolves around a legendary Warrior Priest (Paul Bettany) from the last Vampire War who now lives in obscurity among the other downtrodden human inhabitants in walled-in dystopian cities ruled by the Church. When his niece (Lily Collins) is abducted by a murderous pack of vampires, Priest breaks his sacred vows to venture out on an obsessive quest to find her before they turn her into one of them. He is joined on his crusade by his niece's boyfriend (Cam Gigandet), a trigger-fingered young wasteland sheriff, and a former Warrior Priestess (Maggie Q) who possesses otherworldly fighting skills. Again, this director-actor due brought us a bad movie. atleast LEGION had some story and thrill to it and was a bit interesting, it was bad too but PRIEST is worst than it. thats is like biggest insult for the director and the movie itself, people hated and critics completely panned that movie but whats more worst than calling this movie even worst than Legion? i wasn't willing to see this movie have read the reviews and it is one of the worst reviewd film of the year but i did for a silly summer pleasure. this is kind of a mash up of many genres like a western with Post-apocalyptic world with vampires and religion and some pretty blade runner type of city. movie itself has many cliched things. it just seem like a Resident evil stuff, vampires are awful in it. move is very short and very slow dull and boring paced which makes you feel even it is shorter than other movies it still seems like an overlong movie like it is being stretched. badly made movie. Director Scott Stewart gave a horrible direction to this movie. worst screenplay with many hollow and emptiness and just pure garbage. very badly written. CGI or visual effects are terrible, vampires and everything else looks bad. cinematography is below average and every other technical thing sucks too. what was the point of making this movie, i hope it gets a Razzie nomination seriously man it made me angry. Paul Bettany should stop doing these same old Religious/Rebel hero thing it just doesn't work and i am tired of him. acting performances are awful ofcourse but Cam Gigandent, Stephen Moyer (in small role) and Christopher Plummer looks bit of good in their characters. Karl Urban is the main evil villain in it. the ending scene is the only good thing about it makes you thrill and feel the action but otherwise this movie is a very bad movie. NOT RECOMMENDED at all.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 16 years old
May 29, 2011
 
great action movie

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 15 years old
May 31, 2011
 
don't waste your money on this. Go for a different movie
This is a review from my friend. she believes that the movie was boring and not worth your money. she says it wasn't as action packed as she thought it would be, and she doesn't understand what some of the characters were saying. definitly an off.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
September 6, 2011
 
Ultra-Violent action thriller is NOT at all a PG-13
Honestly, I really don't know why I often dont really mind the movies that get killed by critics and everyone else. I really don't know why this keeps happening, but I really didn't think that Priest was all that bad. In fact, I actually enjoyed some of the action scenes and some of the visuals. Oh well, I guess I just have problems or something. But, even though I did actually like Priest, I have to stress that, like Sucker Punch, Priest is not worthy of the PG-13 Rating that it is given. Not at all. Honestly, I don't have a clue as to how it got this rating. The opning animation sequence should seel the deal already, with it's gruesome carnage and blood soaked decapitations and dismemberments, which is all weorthty of a hard R, let alone a PG-13. Many teens will love it, but many will also be thoroughly disturbed by the explicit violence that is one screen. Also, there is some infrequent by strong profanity, including a extremely unecesary and baffling use of the F-word. But that's about it. Jut don't expect to be blown out of your seats.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 15 years old
August 20, 2011
 
Very. . . interesting.
Priest was one of those movies that tried to be too many things at once. Western, post-apocalyptic, steampunk, horror, fantasy, and that kind of makes it confusing as to what style it really is. The violence in the acutal movie was rather low, but the opening was EXTREMELY gorey. I would be sitting here for hours if I tried to list every little thing that happened in the opening (which is in a manga-style animation), but what really stood out to me was the fact that someone got his eyes litterally knocked out of his head (O_O). I've seen a bit of violent (and disturbing) anime before, but this somehow topped it all. It was litterally blood-soaked. Moving on, there's very little in the issue of sexual content. There is a bit of language, infrequent but rather strong. The acting was good, and though it seemed to be a bit of a mess, I quite enjoyed this film. The style of the vampires was a breath of fresh air after being tourmented by the crappier vamps of this time in the media *coughtwilightchough*, and the visual effects were fantastic. Over all, it wasn't amazing, but it wasn't completely horrible either. Just. . . interesting.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 15 and 19 year old
October 3, 2011
 
Judge yourself! Very good.
I have seen alot of bad reviews on this but as a parent that is over critical of most and my kids barely get to see anything cause of "content" issues. I was pleasantly suprised!. the opening animation sequence is most definitely too bloody&violent for just about anyone but you can skip or have the kids close their eyes for that bit. the rest of the movie was VERY well done. the did not "give away" the story early on stayed action flow no lags. I applaud everyone involved in the making of this film. I have been so tired of over sexualized over everything movies this was very nice. a change. If the movie is actually "paid attention to" the "point" of the movie is VERY well done. please view pay attion don't prejudge based on the reviews. Very good lesson if paid attention to.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent
November 6, 2011
 
Meh.
This movie could have been much better. The ending was abrupt and horrible, and definitely left the audience wanting. I would not advise watching this movie with early teens or children. There are some disturbing images and while I did not find the movie scary, I think a younger crowd would.

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
January 20, 2012
 
Worse than Legion
Director Scott Stewart has managed to make a movie worse than his last film, Legion. Mr. Stewart is a special effects artist, not a director. Maybe he should stop trying to make terrible movies starring Paul Bettany, who was the lead character in both movies. I can't take another one of these movies. Anyway, parents should know that there is violence, obviously. Some blood and some language. Just please avoid the movie.

Flag as inappropriate 

This review was written by Jeffrey M. Anderson
Studio:Screen Gems
Director:Scott Stewart
Cast:Cam Gigandet, Karl Urban, Maggie Q, Paul Bettany
Genre:Science Fiction
Run time:87 minutes
Theatrical release date:May 13, 2011
DVD release date:August 16, 2011
MPAA rating:PG-13
MPAA explanation:intense sequences of violence and action, disturbing images and brief strong language

This review was written by Jeffrey M. Anderson
 

Review It

Share your review with others

Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.

Video review


About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

Great alternatives handpicked by our editors

 

vote now

Will you see Priest?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Been There? Tell us about it