Rambo: First Blood Part II (R, 1985)

common sense media says

Sly shoots up Vietnam in glorified '80s actioner.


parents & educators say
  • 40% say violence is an issue
  • 40% say language is an issue

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that there is abundant violence and killings using guns, knives, and arrows, plus grueling scenes of torture. Swearing is milder than in First Blood, but it's there, as are slight details of prostitution. Kids who don't know much about Vietnam War history probably won't be enlightened here; all that's said is "we weren't allowed to win" as Rambo burns down Indo-Chinese villages and troop convoys.

Positive messages: Rambo mainly kills hostiles, rather than defenseless non-combatants face to face, though he doesn't seem to mind strafing an entire village. While there are "good" Vietnamese shown (mainly Rambo's love-interest), most are enemy slave drivers or pirates. Russians are torturing sadists. Elements of the U.S. military portrayed as untrustworthy worms.
Violence: Blood-spattered shooting. Characters pierced with arrows and blown up with bombs, torched with fire. A character tortured with electrocution, beating, hot metal, threatened eye gouging. Villages and war machines exploded. A U.S. military office sprayed with machine-gun ammo.
Sex: Vietnamese prostitute is a distraction in the enemy camp, and there's a towel-clad girl on a pirate ship, but nothing explicitly shown.
Language: "Bastard" and the f-word once, spoken by Rambo.
Consumerism: Coca-cola machine is prominent.
Drinking, drugs, & smoking: Cigarette smoking (especially by bad guys), social drinking.

More on Rambo: First Blood Part II

What to talk about

Talk to your kids
Families can talk about why Rambo was so popular in the 1980s, when USSR occupation troops could still be found in Afghanistan, Poland, East Germany, and other Cold-War hotspots. Do you think Rambo helped the image of Vietnam veterans (often portrayed by Hollywood as dysfunctional down-and-outs) or was it just another pernicious stereotype? Some critics called Stallone's action movies "fascist" in their glorification of pumped-up white patriots with big guns/fists putting the smackdown on foreign foes. What do you think now?

What's the story?

What's the story?
This sequel to First Blood was a bigger, dumber, and more financially successful action-blockbuster that opened on a then-record number of movie screens. It finds the muscleman combat-hardened Vietnam-supercommando from the first movie brought out of prison to earn a possible presidential pardon. Rambo (Sylvester Stallone) has 36 hours to be air-dropped into communist Vietnam and seek evidence that American POWs are still being held captive. But his superiors -- Yuppie white-collar types only interested in a cover-up -- don't expect him to succeed. When Rambo does find an active POW camp, the Americans abandon him to evil Russian and Viet Cong forces, and Rambo has to fight his way free -- shirtless, muscles gleaming like an oiled bodybuilder, amidst giant fireball explosions.

Is it any good?

Is it any good?
 
"I just saw RAMBO; next time I'll know what to do," famously said President Ronald Reagan, conferring a White House blessing on this action smash-hit. John Rambo, a tragic and mostly human-sized character in the first movie, got peddled aggressively as a Tarzan/Davey Crockett/G.I. Joe combo to 1980s kids, soon showing up in a weekly TV cartoon. Rambo: First Blood Part 2 is cartoonish, and in a B-movie way. When the unstoppable Rambo (he just ignores bullets fired his way half the time) kills a whole Soviet patrol one by one, in a different camouflage disguise/gimmick one edit to the next, you remember Bugs Bunny doing stuff like that to Elmer Fudd or Daffy.

Plus tie-ins with Vietnam War reality, and the melancholy legend maintained by conspiracy-thinkers, that U.S. POWs still languished in enemy hands, seem tactless -- if you take it seriously. If you do scratch below the surface, you may find this overly simplistic message: The U.S. military -- in Rambo's case, one warrior -- could have won Vietnam, or any conflict, if "they" (who? Liberals? Jews? Jane Fonda? Freemasons and Illuminati?) hadn't sabotaged the effort.

Movie themes & details

Movie Details
Studio: Lionsgate
Director: George Pan Cosmatos
Cast: Charles Napier, Richard Crenna, Sylvester Stallone
Genre: Action/Adventure
Run time: 98 minutes
Theatrical release: May 22, 1985
DVD release: November 23, 2004
MPAA Rating: R

This review was written by Charles Cassady Jr.
 
 

Review It

 

Review Rambo: First Blood Part II





Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.
 

What parents & educators say

12
Based on 5 parent & educator reviews:
  • 40% say violence is an issue
  • 40% say language is an issue

Most useful reviews by all members

 
A good sequal to the superb original

Boom boom
parent of 18 year old
 
IT IS GD FOR TWEENS THAT ARE 16 AND UP
I loved this movie becuz it was sooo violent But I don't kids under 14.to watch it becuz it is too violent and has language inappropriate for kidz

4kidshater
teen, 14 years old
 
A more violent, cartoonish, boring movie than the first
This film was boring, very violent, piece of crap. It looked good, but was not. It was very dumb. Get Rambo 3 if you want more boring, violent piece of crap. I say rent it

luke3854
teen, 18 years old
 
Great Movie 13+
Well it has a strong message about GI`s coming back from wars with emotional problems. Rambo kills one person because he was shooting at him and harms defensively but not kill people trying to hunt him down. must see movie

 
Not a bad movie has a lot of fighting tho

7thson
parent of 10 and 22 year old
 
This movie isnt bad
One of my favorite war movies.

rlong1
teen, 15 years old
 
Good but a little IFFY
This movie was pretty good. There was a lot of violence but nothing Really Really bad. Just a lot of blood. For one example I remember an arrow being shot through a mans forehead. The language was a little inopropriate. I have not seen this movie in a while but I think they said the F word at least once.

An independent voice for families
Age-appropriate reviews
 

vote now

Will you see Rambo: First Blood Part II?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Great alternatives handpicked by our editors


About our rating system
ON: Content is appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child, some content may not be right for some kids
OFF: Not age appropriate for kids this age