About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

A safe community is important to us.
Please observe our guidelines.

All teen and kid reviews for The Ring Two

Age
12
Average rating based on 21 kid and teen reviews:
  • 48% say violence is an issue
Kid, 12 years old
May 13, 2011
 
Pretty good movie
i thought this movie was pretty good. I think honestly people shouldn't be rating this movie for 15+ i was 10 when I saw this and didn't jump once! Overall this movie is pretty good and if you want some not bloody but intense and anticipation you should see this movie.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 14 years old
April 2, 2011
 
A little better than critics say; not as good as the first, but somewhat scarier.
My rating: PG-13 for disturbing content including some scenes of violence and one use of language.

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 14 years old
September 17, 2010
 
Okay
This movie got a little bnoring and stupid. But all together I thought it was fine. The part in the bathroom was really cool when all the water was going to the ceiling. It was scarier than the first but that's not saying much. If you enjoyed the first Ring than you should watch this.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 16 years old
August 28, 2009
 
Scares are scarce
in this mediocre sequel to a pretty interesting film I saw a good 3/4 of. The acting by the young child matches that of Channing Tatum in "G.I. Joe:" Awful. Special effects are large, and there is one hilarious scene with strong profanity, but that's the only case that I caught of harsh language. Mostly talk, "The Ring Two" is only for die-hard horror fanatics, something that I am not.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 16 years old
July 12, 2009
 
wow!!
it was very good quality on the graphics.i last watched it when i was 12 and loved it!! i didnt find it scary as it was a happy ending. so no nightmares for me!! :)

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 16 years old
April 10, 2009
 
Better, scarier, and more intense than the first!!!!!
Thuis is much better than the first movie, because unlike the first one, it is more of a horror, and it dose have issues, 1. Many jump scenes, smara is very creepy, many images will downright freak you out (i will not share said imiages because of spoilers), two wemon try to drown their children, images of suicide. 2. language is mild, mostly a-s or d--n, but this is because twoards the end, there is one F word. overall, if you liked the first one you will love this one!

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 18 years old
April 9, 2008
 
i jumped and i laughed
pre-teens SHOULD watch the ring then the ring2 and i promise you will like them

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 13 years old
August 7, 2010
 
I really liked this movie. It does lack storyline like the grudge 2 but I still enjoyed it. It can be jumpy in parts. 9+ can handle it

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 11 years old
October 21, 2009
 
they can handle it

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 14 years old
July 22, 2010
 
just don't watch it. this is the kind of movie that a person would wish they never watched. sometimes i still think about that little girl coming out of the television. it wasn't too scary, just disturbing.

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 13 years old
June 24, 2010
 
Nikko Thinks ...
at first i thought this movie was just to follow up the ring and that now it wouldnt make sense and sence its 2005 the age were the blood and gore began becomeing popular in movies i thought is was just going to be like that but its not i thought i was great not scary my friend got scard of this one not the ring1 so i would have rated this on for 9+ butsense they thought it was scaryer i rated it on for 10+ the thing i didn't like was that they did a whole new plot for it after the middle part there is no concerns but highlights it has good role models because of the main charecter facing her fears and positve messegaes because of her faceing her fears and yes there are some mild word like crap but not bad words

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 16 years old
April 9, 2008
 
It wasnt as scary as The Grudge My mom kept saying stuff making me laugh

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 18 years old
April 9, 2008
 
FAKE ! ! ! !
This was so not realistic at all.The first was way more scarie and better. The fakest part is whan the deer atack the car. Don't waist your time with The Ring Two. But you need to see the first its great ! ! ! !

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 14 years old
July 28, 2011
 
Ring 2 unrated version
I tried to find the pg-13 version but couldn't so got the unrated version (this is what Netflix will send you). In the unrated version they don't add anything gory or anymore bad stuff. They added a few scenes, which means that it has to go before the ratings board again, but the film makers decided not to so it has an UN rating. If you've seen the first then you can probably see this one. Some people say this is scarier then the first but in my opinion it's not except for when the deer attack and Samara is chasing Rachael up the well. They barely show the tape this time and I think the horror elements are pretty tame. There are scenes that show Rachel trying to drown Aiden, and Rachel jumping from a cliff, but these aren't shown in a violent or graphic way. In one scene she yells the f-word at Samara but there is very little bad language besides that. I'd say this movie is intense and thrilling more than "scary" and definitely not gory.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 18 years old
May 17, 2009
 
Good
This movie is not that scary but can be at times.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
April 24, 2009
 
After the first movie, i found the Ring 2 a bit of a let down. There are still many questions left unanswered, and the scene where the deer attack the car seem quite pathetic. Although, other scenes are the complete opposite and can bee quite disturbing. Still a good movie, just not as good as the first.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 15 years old
April 9, 2008
 
Pathetic
Wow, the freakin dear part was hysterical...

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
April 9, 2008
 
FAKE ! ! ! !
This movie is SO BAD it isn't funny. It had a few freeky parts but the rest were harible. There are only a few use of language but they are not bad. Please DON"T WAIST YOUR TIME ! ! ! ! If you have not seen the first do it it ROCKS ! ! ! ! it is SO SCARIE !

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 15 years old
December 17, 2011
 
worst movie ever!!!
This movie is terrible! It isn't scary, it's boreing and only a couple scenes are jumpy. it uses the f word once and a couple die, but there iusn't any gore.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
April 9, 2008
 
love it
love it

Flag as inappropriate