Saw II (R, 2005)

common sense media says

Gruesome and explicit -- not for kids.


parents & educators say
  • 29% say violence is an issue

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that this movie is not for kids. It features gruesome violence, with detailed, explicit imagery of bodies penetrated by sharp implements, shot, burned up, slammed, smashed, punched, kicked, sawed, cut, and dismembered. The movie includes jump scenes and frequent arguments among victims and cops, as well as between the primary cop and the killer, who holds the cop's son hostage. The father and son argue at the beginning of the film, setting the stage for the father's remorse and anger. Characters bleed (lots), vomit, and cough blood. Characters smoke and curse relentlessly; in flashback, one character injects drugs, to demonstrate her addiction. The film also features "extreme" editing, very rough and jaggedy, which in itself may be disturbing for some viewers.

Positive messages: Killer is vengeful and malicious; father yells at his son; characters cheat and abuse each other out of fear.
Violence: Gruesome, bloody violence, as serial killer takes out victims one by one.
Sex: Women wear small, tight tops; one male victim appears in his boxers; reference made to a "door" between a woman's legs.
Language: Frequent cursing, including the f-word.
Consumerism: Not applicable.
Drinking, drugs, & smoking: Cigarette smoking, intravenous drug use (and character is then dropped in a pit full of needles), a beer bottle appears on a table.

More on Saw II

What to talk about

Talk to your kids
Families can talk about the movie's rudimentary efforts to set up the killer's "moralistic" framework. How does Jigsaw judge his victims in order to rationalize his cruelty? How might the father and son have worked out their conflict in a less sensational way? What does the son want from his father? And where is the mother in all this?

What's the story?

What's the story?
SAW II brings back the serial killer Jigsaw (Tobin Bell), this time as a self-styled family counselor with terminal cancer. It seems that Detective Eric Matthews (Donnie Wahlberg) is not paying proper attention to his troubled son Daniel (Erik Knudsen), and so Jigsaw takes a moralistic interest. Eric comes with the usual compromised background: he's been riding a desk since his own coppish corruption was exposed five years ago. Empowered by his deadly illness, Jigsaw gathers together an assortment of Eric's rigged-evidence victims, recently released from prison and puts them in a booby-trapped house with young Daniel. He also arranges to have every room monitored by video camera, the feeds available for viewing by the cops, in Jigsaw's lair.

Is it any good?

Is it any good?
 
As before, Jigsaw points out to anyone who will listen that he doesn't actually kill anyone, he just sets up his victims and then offers them "choices." Their icky deaths are their own fault. Such reasoning was the premise of Saw, a surprise hit that recycled hoary psycho killer conventions to extra-splattery effect ("There will be blood"). In SAW II, the repetition is only compounded: Jigsaw is suffering from terminal cancer, which he presumes grants him moral authority: "Those who do not appreciate life do not deserve life."

 

And as always, Jigsaw ("Call me John," he tells Eric) is chatty in the extreme, explaining his games far beyond the point of interest. He talks at Eric and by tape, he talks at the victims in the house (including Franky G, Glenn Plummer, and the first film's Shawnee Smith, returned for more abuse). None of the players in this game is particularly appealing. But even as the film's focus on sadistic pleasures raises questions about audiences' desire to "watch," it's all retread.

Movie themes & details

Movie Details
Studio: Lionsgate
Director: Darren Lynn Bousman
Cast: Beverley Mitchell, Donnie Wahlberg, Tobin Bell
Genre: Horror
Run time: 93 minutes
Theatrical release: October 28, 2005
DVD release: February 14, 2006
MPAA Rating: R
MPAA explanation: grisly violence and gore, terror, language and drug content

This review was written by Cynthia Fuchs
 
 

Review It

 

Review Saw II





Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.
 

What parents & educators say

15
Based on 24 parent & educator reviews:
  • 29% say violence is an issue

Most useful reviews by all members

J-dog21
teen, 16 years old
 
great movie
Great movie violent but ends with a great twist, not as violent as the first though

campcott4
kid, 13 years old
 
gory, good, but over the top-gore!
This movie is good, but it's gore city. This is a fright fest not for the faint of heart, please, kids 10 and under shoukld not see this psycho killer, guts-filled, explicit horror movie about a man turning drug dealers, addicts, abusers and murderers and cheaters in to torture experiments in a nerve gas house.

Austin0896
teen, 15 years old
 
Violent...
Not appropriate for most 14 year olds. Very violent bloody, gory. Prolly 50+ f-words. All the people in it are terrible role models. The entire message is just a terrible message. Much more blood than I expected even. Almost every second. But this one actually is enjoying to watch because the plot is decent and there are some real surprises for all of you Saw and horror movie fans out there.

:-)
adult
 
good
good suitibull for babies

scissorluv971
teen, 14 years old
 
:P
Rated R for Language, Drug content, Sexual references, and being downright disgusting.

nalpykeens
teen, 15 years old
 
Great film, fine for teens who are alright with gore and horror
Great movie, i have freinds who've seen it when they were 12 or 13 but its not for the squeamish. Good plot and gets your heart beating at times.

chow13
adult
 
Not as good as the first, but still worth watching

bradley4846
teen, 17 years old
 
Almost as Good ast the first
this is one of the best sequals ive ever seen. the twist is great, and it lives up to the 1st one. Yes, don't watch if your really violent sensetive. its not to bad tho. The language is usually the fword, but minor words are used. dont see unless uve seen the 1st one

Linkin Park ...
teen, 16 years old
 
Definitely gorier than the first
Better than the original and more gore as well

deadman13
teen, 13 years old
 
Good Movie
I think the first Saw movie was better. This one is more bloody. Jigsaw gets his but kicked by a cop. Overall it is a good movie

wwechampion
kid, 11 years old
 
Saw II
Rated R For Grisly Violence And Gore,Terror,Language And Drug Content

horror-lover-b ...
parent of 17 year old
 
worst in the series
gross movie. how can the first be okay for most ages but not this one! the 3rd is great!

DKRUMBLE725
teen, 17 years old
 
Two is better than Numbah One
This is one of my favorite SAW movies. It's one of the bloodiest in the series. By the way, in this one, they say the F word over 80 Time (I tried to count them) It's way better than the first movie, but it would scare most little kids to death. Mid to older teens would LOVE this movie.

mynameisnick
teen, 15 years old
 
Not good for anyone under 15, or those who are a bit squeamish.
This is way more violent and has a lot more gore. This one is again, good for teens who can handle violence, but the language is non-stop. It's the parent's choice.

WafflesDelicious
kid, 11 years old
 
i saw 3 parts and could barely eat or drink. i think it is gruesome and terrorizing.

 
i want to play a game part.2
Not good as part 1 but still really enjoyable more creation but still i prefer saw 1.

Puppyluv13
teen, 15 years old
 
Awesome Movie! Better than the last one!

mariosuperslug ...
kid, 12 years old
 
middle school aged or older
under 9:freaky nightmares,9-11:little to scary.12-14:a little iffy,15 or older:nothing wrong. well this says the f word at least 20 times and is kinda violent and creepy unlike the 1st.

thedigitalmast ...
teen, 14 years old
 
Good, gory sequel, not as good as original
This movie is a good follow-up to the first one. Although, the traps are back, and there's more of 'em. The characters are hardened and evil criminals who deserve every bit of torture they get, except for the teenager and the blond girl.It is a good, gore-fest sequel, but lacks the sympathetic characters and great story line of the first one. good, but can be missed in favor of the original.

Would I ever ...
teen, 16 years old
 
Eh...movie's not that bad. CSM is over reacting. Interesting, cool movie. Positive role models and messages, educational. Mature 6 year olds and kids 7 and up can watch this.

An independent voice for families
Age-appropriate reviews
 

vote now

Will you see Saw II?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Great alternatives handpicked by our editors


About our rating system
ON: Content is appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child, some content may not be right for some kids
OFF: Not age appropriate for kids this age