A safe community is important to us.
Please observe our guidelines.
All parent reviews for Saw II
Average rating based on 23 parent reviews:
- 30% say violence is an issue
AGE
worst in the series
gross movie. how can the first be okay for most ages but not this one! the 3rd is great!
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
i want to play a game part.2
Not good as part 1 but still really enjoyable more creation but still i prefer saw 1.
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
Not as good as the first, but still worth watching
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
No way. To dumb for anyone.
What is wrong with everybody???!! There's nothing good to say about the "Saw" franchise. There is only one horror movie that falls beneath those in this series ("The Hills Have Eyes 2"), but at least in that film, they made an attempt (which failed beyond your wildest dreams) to generate suspense. The writers of the "Saw" films don't even think about suspense, or how scary the film is. They don't even bother with plot. This film is nothing more than a bunch of torture scenes, held together by nothing but a few lines of the worst dialogue I have ever heard in any film. Don't evn bother with this utter atrociosity. There is nothing wrong with gore or torture in films, but when the film's plot is not only based on blood and gore, but relies on it, there's no chance that that film is worth watching. This film is just so stupid, so brainless that there's no way it could ever possibly justify it's existence.
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
Let-Down of a Sequel to a Great Psychological Thriller
Okay, how could this happen? After a wonderful psychological thriller in 2004, "SAW" has a sequel in 2005 that is, well, less than what is expected. This film is about a handful of Jigsaw's new victims finding their way through a test-rigged house. Things to look out for are: References to adultery and affairs, an offensive and hurtful sexual remark toward a woman to her face, gratutious vicious brooding violence throughout including on-screen torture and brutality toward defenseless victims, profanity throughout with the most frequent cuss being the "F" word, and references to the use of illegal narcotics. Bottom line: This movie is rated R. Ages 16+. 4/5 stars. Enjoy.
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
Stupid boring waste of a good movie
This could have been a truly awesome movie but it just wasn't. The deaths were dumb the acting was bad and it just altogether sucked
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
this movie was even better than the first . more gore more trapes and more bloody fun
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
baby
i love tv soooooooooooooooooo much saw three yhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
the great movie
i loved the all 5 movies i cant what to see the other 2 6 and 7
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
Not Ok
Anyone, no matter what age, will be disturbed by this movie. The way people are murdered one-by-one is devastating. It's no way to die. I would strongly recommend not seeing this if you are under the age of 17. Anyone older, watch it at your own risk.
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
WOW!
Wow this movie is awesome for anyone that can handle the violence. this film ceratinly qualifies as a great horror flick but it is not for the younger age groups. It was very freaky for me and I am 17 anyone younger would certainly have some trouble digesting the movie.
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
Sick, but Decent
Overall a very screwed up, gory movie. Decent for horror movie lovers who can take gore, but everyone else should skip it.
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
ok
its pretty much very similar to the first gory, but more pointless
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
i loved it
it was the scariest movie i've ever seen, definitely a must see
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
bloody AS HELL
this movie is bloody kids under 13 should skip it and wait into 15 but not scary i enjoyed it
Was this review useful?
|
|
