Saw V (R, 2008)

common sense media says

Dullest film in series is still brutal and bloody.


parents & educators say
  • 64% say violence is an issue
  • 43% say language is an issue

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that this "torture porn" horror movie is full of graphic, grisly violence that combines sadistic terror with state-of-the-art makeup and effects. Lots characters are killed in lots of ways, all very graphically and all shown on screen. There are flashbacks to deaths and violence from earlier films in the Saw series and extensive use of crime scene photographs showing dead bodies. There's also some strong language (including "f--k"), but the majority of the film involves sadistic brutality crafted by the film's villain as a series of "games" -- like a sequence in which characters trapped in a room with a bomb must volunteer to place their arms in a box with a saw so their blood will fill a jar; when filled, the jar will trigger the door that leads to safety. That's just one example; there are many, many more.

Positive messages: A killer frames an innocent man for his crimes; a serial killer traps people in insane deathtraps; discussions of corruption, bribery, arson, and drug addiction.
Violence: Constant, brutal, bloody violence, including beatings, clubbing, shootings, stabbings, and more. Characters are constantly placed in maniacal deathtraps against their will. A woman is decapitated by one of these traps; a man is eviscerated by a pendulum blade; another man is killed by a bomb. A wounded woman is seen convulsing as electrical current is applied to her body. A man is trapped in a box full of razor wire. Blood is sprayed, spit up, and spilled liberally. Dead bodies are seen on screen and in crime scene photographs; throats are slit; people are stabbed with hypodermic needles and sedated against their will; bones are crushed; a man's arms are broken with such force that the bone is seen protruding from the flesh; a man whose head is trapped in a box filling with water self-administers a tracheotomy to survive. A man and woman place their hands on a band saw that splits their arm between the radius and ulna halfway up their forearm; the grotesque wound is shown on screen. People are threatened with guns, nail bombs, electrocution, and more.
Sex: Some discussion of sexual activity; a corpse is shown with cleavage visible.
Language: Frequent strong language, including "f--k," "motherf---er," "a--hole," "s--t," and more.
Consumerism: Not applicable.
Drinking, drugs, & smoking: Characters drink hard liquor, beer, and wine; cigarettes are held -- but not smoked -- on screen. A drug addict character is in the throes of withdrawal and shows his needle marks.

More on Saw V

What to talk about

Talk to your kids
Families can talk about why people are drawn to violent and sadistic films. What is their appeal? Also, is there an artistic difference between a well-made gory film and a badly made one? Is there a moral or ethical difference? Families can also discuss the ongoing popularity of the Saw series -- are the producers just giving people what they want, or bleeding a cash cow?

What's the story?

What's the story?
Picking up immediately after the events in Saw IV, SAW V follows police forensics expert Hoffman (Costas Mandylor), a cop who was originally on the trail of the serial killer known as Jigsaw (Tobin Bell) -- but who now has, it seems, become his protégé, continuing Jigsaw's psychotic work after his death. Five strangers are locked in yet another series of rooms filled with Jigsaw's deadly "games," while Hoffman tries to elude FBI agent Strahm (Scott Patterson), who's realizing that Hoffman isn't the man who solved Jigsaw's crimes but instead the man who helped perpetrate them.

Is it any good?

Is it any good?
 
The Saw series has become a staple of modern horror, but the fact is that series creators James Wan and Leigh Wannell moved on after Saw III; the Saw movies are now mass-production commodities, and the machinery seems to be lubricated with blood. Saw V flashes back to the earlier Saw films and shows audiences new twists on what has gone before; the assumption that we'll be interested is a fairly presumptuous one on the part of the filmmakers. The acting is at a soap-opera level; the biggest star in the film is Bell (whose Jigsaw may have died in the last movie but gets a surprising amount of screen time nonetheless thanks to all the flashbacks). And the whole film is shot by director David Hackl with a smeary, cheap look, as if the camera lens were behind a thin film of bacon fat or soot.

The film sets up Saw VI, of course, but it also takes the time to show us plenty of horrible violence -- decapitation, self-mutilation, bone-grinding pressure, eviscerating blades -- carried out by deathtrap "games" that the killer uses as objects of moral instruction. Screenwriters Patrick Melton and Marcus Dunstan clearly devoted more thought to crafting and developing these games than they did to crafting and developing the characters trapped in them. The first Saw film, while hardly brilliant, had a certain grim giddy glee to its inventive murders and terrible tortures; Saw V is worn down and weary under a numbing burden of repetition.

Movie themes & details

Movie Details
Studio: Lionsgate
Director: David Hackl
Cast: Costas Mandylor, Scott Patterson, Tobin Bell
Genre: Horror
Run time: 92 minutes
Theatrical release: October 24, 2008
DVD release: January 20, 2009
MPAA Rating: R
MPAA explanation: sequences of grisly bloody violence and torture, language and brief nudity.
Watch our review

This review was written by James Rocchi
 
 

Review It

 

Review Saw V





Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.
 

What parents & educators say

15
Based on 14 parent & educator reviews:
  • 64% say violence is an issue
  • 43% say language is an issue

Most useful reviews by all members

bradley4846
teen, 17 years old
 
Least Violent Movie
I don't get why people dont like this one its just as good as the others. THis is more of a thriller (outside the game), so there is not as much violence. There are many uses of f--k and other swears. Don't Let Reviews Not LEt You See this

BlueRocks360
kid, 13 years old
 
Please don't watch this if you are a kid!!!
That was scary for me. I did'nt like it.

IronZombie75
teen, 16 years old
 
good movie for 14 and up! :P
Now i don't know why people think this movie sucks. I personally loved it! Warning: Contains extreme gore: getting stomach sliced open by giant pendulum blade, intestines, guts, and gore hitting the walls, very gory. Hands getting sliced down the middle by circular saw, extremely bloody! Also has decapitation, electricution, etc. VERY GOOD MOVIE if your a fan of the saw series :P

 
the sun doesnt shine allways
WAY better than saw IV atleast this part aint gruesome and also it has way better narrative than in previous series. i enjoyed this more than saw 3/4

DKRUMBLE725
teen, 17 years old
 
Disagree with Common Sense, this movie is not too dull
Beleive it or not, I liked this better than Saw 2. I liked the storyline and how it blended with the other films. Gore is not as bad, language is still prevelant. If you watch one Saw movie, make sure it's this one!

abbylucas
teen, 17 years old
 
It's not like you didn't know what was coming
You've seen the last 4 saws, so it's not like you don't know what's coming.It's gory but it isn't scary, if you have a weak stomach I wouldn't reccommend it.

sweetie1025
teen, 16 years old
 
I loved it! It was the first saw movie I ever watched.. After the movie, my best friend and I rented all the other Saw movies.. He and I loved it! I'm a girl and was 12 [or 13] when I watched them. I don't think it ever would have given me nightmares. When I was 4, I watched Chuckie, and IT, I had no problems. Although, I do think children shouldn't be as callous as they are. I haven't found any movie that disurbed me. I would reccomend it for everyone, it is really great! Plus, the reason anyone watches a horror movie is to watch something sick and demented..

benhead
teen, 17 years old
 
Perfect for ALL gore and horror film addicts
Its amazing! it explains and answers a lot of unanswered questions, highly recommended for all gore and horror film addicts.

horrorfreak94
teen, 17 years old
 
II = best, I, IV, V = good, III = ew.
reallllllllllly violent. not as gross as III but some parts are really bad for violence and such.

Mindfreak13
teen, 15 years old
 
Another Good Saw Movie But Not As Good As Others
This Saw film is OK. Not the best but it is still very good. Not that bloody but just enough to satisfy me! I thought they could have done a better job on it. Still a good movie. I'm not saying its bad! I would rent it if you are a Saw fan!

Linkin Park ...
teen, 16 years old
 
Not as gory as most of the films
Not as gory as any of the others.... well more than the first one and maybe the second but thats about it... more twists and turns

Infantry121
parent of 12 and 17 year old
 
My 12 year old has seen more gore in movies
I let my daughter watch it,me and my wife had to drag her off the couch.The only reason i watched it was i wanted to see the murders,this one rocked.oh,BlueRocks,wtf are you doing watching saw!

kh2master
teen, 16 years old
 
you'd seen them all before
it is the same thing as the first four saws. it's violent, gory, and it has a lot of swearing.it has same torture.

mjetter432
teen, 15 years old
 
Good Movie For A Mature Teen
The Saw movies yes they are: Gory, violent and brutal. They are not: Torture porn, real by any manner and bad movies. The fifth one in the series, has always has a brilliant twist ending and traps. Although it is very violent, throughout the whole movie there is a dark underlying message which should not be passed up lightly: Be glad you are living. Again these movies are gory, but very fake. For example (no spoilers): When one of the girls head is decapitated and it falls down, stop motion action was used, with a puppet. It is really fake looking! Please just give these a try and stop being byased against them! If you want to rat on a movie, I've heard some bad things about the Hostels! A solid four stars for a brilliant movie!

cheedarcheez
teen, 16 years old
 
OK film
this film isnt gory but the deaths are pretty twisted. i would let young people see it.

Voodoodolllove
kid, 11 years old
 
Didn't scare me...its just addicting...
I LOVED IT!!! Honestly, me and my friends talked about stuff like this before we even saw (no pun intended) and horror movie!!! But it may be too gory, violent or have too much swearing, but I liked it

mynameisnick
teen, 15 years old
 
Like always, more mature audiences should go see this, not for kids.
This is one more of a revenge kind of movie. Also, I think the opening scene is about the most twisted trap of them all. Very good movie for older audiences though, my most favorite in the series.

ipodfan2000
parent of 14 year old
 
Why you shouldnt let your kids watch any movies in the Saw franchise
This Movie has pretty much everything from blood and gore to cursing, nudity, sexual content and much more profane material.

ThreeDaysGrace ...
teen, 15 years old
 
Like I've said, it depends on how much you can handle. @zombieslaya: Your kids do not say that. If they do, then they need to be reported (as well as yourself) to a psychiatric ward.

@@@
parent
 
One of the worst films. Ever.
Stupid film which, like all of the other "Saw" films, lacks supense, horror and plot, but this time, the lack of those things is SO obvious that even the biggest fans of the franchise will grind thier teeth and hope this film is shorter than the rest. There is no excuse for the writers of these films to keep thier jobs. How dare they bombard us with this ****ed up, stupid, brainless (figuratively) nonsense and expect us to see it through to the end. If you liked this film, then all I can say is...what the f***? This film is just an excuse to steal the money from you. That's what makes these films even more atrocious, as if they weren't already shockingly bad enough already. It really is laughable to see how badly written, directed and acted these films are. To sum up, the "Saw" series can just get ****ed.

An independent voice for families
Age-appropriate reviews
 

vote now

Will you see Saw V?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Great alternatives handpicked by our editors


About our rating system
ON: Content is appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child, some content may not be right for some kids
OFF: Not age appropriate for kids this age