Saw V

  • Review Date: October 26, 2008
  • R
  • Genre: Horror
  • 2008
 Review

Common Sense Media says

Dullest film in series is still brutal and bloody.
greenON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
yellowPAUSE: Know your child; some content
may not be right for some kids.
redOFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
not for kidsNOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids any age.

Find out more

Quality
 
Sometimes media can be age appropriate but a real waste of time. Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Parents say

Kids say

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that this "torture porn" horror movie is full of graphic, grisly violence that combines sadistic terror with state-of-the-art makeup and effects. Lots characters are killed in lots of ways, all very graphically and all shown on screen. There are flashbacks to deaths and violence from earlier films in the Saw series and extensive use of crime scene photographs showing dead bodies. There's also some strong language (including "f--k"), but the majority of the film involves sadistic brutality crafted by the film's villain as a series of "games" -- like a sequence in which characters trapped in a room with a bomb must volunteer to place their arms in a box with a saw so their blood will fill a jar; when filled, the jar will trigger the door that leads to safety. That's just one example; there are many, many more.

  • A killer frames an innocent man for his crimes; a serial killer traps people in insane deathtraps; discussions of corruption, bribery, arson, and drug addiction.
  • Constant, brutal, bloody violence, including beatings, clubbing, shootings, stabbings, and more. Characters are constantly placed in maniacal deathtraps against their will. A woman is decapitated by one of these traps; a man is eviscerated by a pendulum blade; another man is killed by a bomb. A wounded woman is seen convulsing as electrical current is applied to her body. A man is trapped in a box full of razor wire. Blood is sprayed, spit up, and spilled liberally. Dead bodies are seen on screen and in crime scene photographs; throats are slit; people are stabbed with hypodermic needles and sedated against their will; bones are crushed; a man's arms are broken with such force that the bone is seen protruding from the flesh; a man whose head is trapped in a box filling with water self-administers a tracheotomy to survive. A man and woman place their hands on a band saw that splits their arm between the radius and ulna halfway up their forearm; the grotesque wound is shown on screen. People are threatened with guns, nail bombs, electrocution, and more.
  • Some discussion of sexual activity; a corpse is shown with cleavage visible.
  • Frequent strong language, including "f--k," "motherf---er," "a--hole," "s--t," and more.
  • Not applicable.
  • Characters drink hard liquor, beer, and wine; cigarettes are held -- but not smoked -- on screen. A drug addict character is in the throes of withdrawal and shows his needle marks.

What's the story?

Picking up immediately after the events in Saw IV, SAW V follows police forensics expert Hoffman (Costas Mandylor), a cop who was originally on the trail of the serial killer known as Jigsaw (Tobin Bell) -- but who now has, it seems, become his protégé, continuing Jigsaw's psychotic work after his death. Five strangers are locked in yet another series of rooms filled with Jigsaw's deadly "games," while Hoffman tries to elude FBI agent Strahm (Scott Patterson), who's realizing that Hoffman isn't the man who solved Jigsaw's crimes but instead the man who helped perpetrate them.


Is it any good?

 

The Saw series has become a staple of modern horror, but the fact is that series creators James Wan and Leigh Wannell moved on after Saw III; the Saw movies are now mass-production commodities, and the machinery seems to be lubricated with blood. Saw V flashes back to the earlier Saw films and shows audiences new twists on what has gone before; the assumption that we'll be interested is a fairly presumptuous one on the part of the filmmakers. The acting is at a soap-opera level; the biggest star in the film is Bell (whose Jigsaw may have died in the last movie but gets a surprising amount of screen time nonetheless thanks to all the flashbacks). And the whole film is shot by director David Hackl with a smeary, cheap look, as if the camera lens were behind a thin film of bacon fat or soot.

The film sets up Saw VI, of course, but it also takes the time to show us plenty of horrible violence -- decapitation, self-mutilation, bone-grinding pressure, eviscerating blades -- carried out by deathtrap "games" that the killer uses as objects of moral instruction. Screenwriters Patrick Melton and Marcus Dunstan clearly devoted more thought to crafting and developing these games than they did to crafting and developing the characters trapped in them. The first Saw film, while hardly brilliant, had a certain grim giddy glee to its inventive murders and terrible tortures; Saw V is worn down and weary under a numbing burden of repetition.


Sign Up Message
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
Each week we send a customized newsletter to our parent and teen subscribers. Parents can customize their settings to receive recommendations and parent tips based on their kids’ ages. Teens receive a version just for them with the latest reviews and top picks for movies, video games, apps, music, books, and more.
Please enter an email address.
Please check your email address for possible typos.
Sorry, you must be 13 or older to subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Sign me up!

What families can talk about

Families can talk about why people are drawn to violent and sadistic films. What is their appeal? Also, is there an artistic difference between a well-made gory film and a badly made one? Is there a moral or ethical difference? Families can also discuss the ongoing popularity of the Saw series -- are the producers just giving people what they want, or bleeding a cash cow?


This review was written by James Rocchi
Teen, 18 years old
September 13, 2010
 
Least Violent Movie
I don't get why people dont like this one its just as good as the others. THis is more of a thriller (outside the game), so there is not as much violence. There are many uses of f--k and other swears. Don't Let Reviews Not LEt You See this

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
September 17, 2010
 
the sun doesnt shine allways
WAY better than saw IV atleast this part aint gruesome and also it has way better narrative than in previous series. i enjoyed this more than saw 3/4

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 13 years old
December 22, 2009
 
Please don't watch this if you are a kid!!!
That was scary for me. I did'nt like it.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
June 27, 2010
 
Not as gory as most of the films
Not as gory as any of the others.... well more than the first one and maybe the second but thats about it... more twists and turns

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 18 years old
June 11, 2010
 
Perfect for ALL gore and horror film addicts
Its amazing! it explains and answers a lot of unanswered questions, highly recommended for all gore and horror film addicts.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
March 10, 2010
 
Disagree with Common Sense, this movie is not too dull
Beleive it or not, I liked this better than Saw 2. I liked the storyline and how it blended with the other films. Gore is not as bad, language is still prevelant. If you watch one Saw movie, make sure it's this one!

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 18 years old
February 6, 2010
 
It's not like you didn't know what was coming
You've seen the last 4 saws, so it's not like you don't know what's coming.It's gory but it isn't scary, if you have a weak stomach I wouldn't reccommend it.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
November 1, 2009
 
good movie for 14 and up! :P
Now i don't know why people think this movie sucks. I personally loved it! Warning: Contains extreme gore: getting stomach sliced open by giant pendulum blade, intestines, guts, and gore hitting the walls, very gory. Hands getting sliced down the middle by circular saw, extremely bloody! Also has decapitation, electricution, etc. VERY GOOD MOVIE if your a fan of the saw series :P

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 18 years old
June 10, 2009
 
II = best, I, IV, V = good, III = ew.
reallllllllllly violent. not as gross as III but some parts are really bad for violence and such.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 12 and 17 year old
April 1, 2010
 
My 12 year old has seen more gore in movies
I let my daughter watch it,me and my wife had to drag her off the couch.The only reason i watched it was i wanted to see the murders,this one rocked.oh,BlueRocks,wtf are you doing watching saw!

Flag as inappropriate 

This review was written by James Rocchi
Studio:Lionsgate
Director:David Hackl
Cast:Costas Mandylor, Scott Patterson, Tobin Bell
Genre:Horror
Run time:92 minutes
Theatrical release date:October 24, 2008
DVD release date:January 20, 2009
MPAA rating:R
MPAA explanation:sequences of grisly bloody violence and torture, language and brief nudity.

This review was written by James Rocchi
 

Review It

Share your review with others

Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.

Video review


About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

Great alternatives handpicked by our editors

 

vote now

Will you see Saw V?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Been There? Tell us about it