Sherlock Holmes

 Review

Common Sense Media says

Gritty, action-packed take on famous sleuth's adventures.
greenON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
yellowPAUSE: Know your child; some content
may not be right for some kids.
redOFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
not for kidsNOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids any age.

Find out more

Quality
 
Sometimes media can be age appropriate but a real waste of time. Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Parents say

Kids say

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that director Guy Ritchie's take on the Sherlock Holmes legend -- which stars Robert Downey Jr., Jude Law, and Rachel McAdams -- presents an earthier, brawnier, and glossier version of the famous literary/cinematic detective than most of us are used to ... which is exactly why teens will love it. Gritty, late-1800s London is the movie's backdrop, and there's no shortage of action -- from brutal, slo-mo fistfight scenes (most with blood and broken bones) to gunplay and big explosions. There are also some fairly gory crime scenes (including shots of dead bodies, one with a few wriggling maggots), a brief scene of a naked (aside from a strategically placed pillow) Holmes handcuffed to a bed, references to the dark rituals of occult secret societies, smoking, and drinking. But there's no swearing to speak of, and the movie ultimately celebrates Holmes and Watson's close friendship.

  • There are some power-hungry, murderous villains on the loose in London, and the city itself is presented as a fairly brutal, gritty environment. But the film also celebrates Holmes' eccentric genius and his close friendship with Watson. Though he's a cantankerous soul, Holmes clearly values his friend and even tries to save a former paramour despite the fact that she once double-crossed him.
  • They trade barbs and are feisty with each other, but Holmes and Watson always fight for the good -- and for each other. That said, they're so intent on capturing villains that they sometimes sacrifice their personal lives. Irene is a strong, capable female character, but she's also manipulative and self-serving.
  • Frequent violence, including gunplay, bloody fistfights (some in slow-motion, detailing each painful blow in wince-inducing fashion), and a few big explosions. Guns, knives, a rudimentary Taser, and poison are used in various face-offs; corpses are displayed (in dirt with maggots visible, singed to a crisp after being engulfed in flames, dead in bathtub water). Men are shown hanging from a noose; a woman nearly stabs herself. Animal carcasses are shown hanging and sawed in half; a frog is shown in mid-dissection; dead rats are seen.
  • A man is briefly shown naked and handcuffed to a bed, with only a pillow covering his private parts. He makes a suggestive sexual comment to the chamber maid. Some flirty banter between former lovers, and a few quick kisses exchanged between them. A woman undresses; her naked back is glimpsed.
  • Very little; extremely infrequent uses of words like "damn" and "hell."
  • Not applicable.
  • Holmes sometimes drinks to excess (and he isn't always picky about what he drinks to get there);  characters drink wine at a restaurant; Holmes smokes a pipe. 

What's the story?

Bloodthirsty British Lord Blackwood (Mark Strong) -- who has a penchant for dark, occult rituals -- has turned serial killer, terrorizing late-1800s London. Enter Sherlock Holmes (Robert Downey Jr.), Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s keenly observant detective, and his comrade-in-arms, Dr. Watson (Jude Law), who manage to capture Blackwood and get him thrown behind bars. But after he’s hanged, his body disappears from its crypt; it appears he's risen from the dead to come after Holmes. But with Watson about to get engaged and an old flame (Rachel McAdams) hounding him, what is Holmes to do? Can his deductive powers get him out of this dangerous scrape?


Is it any good?

 

Guy Ritchie’s film is ostensibly about a detective, but in this version, it’s also about two buddies who've had a lifetime of adventure, making the friendship between Holmes and Watson seem both believable and relatable. Downey Jr. and Law are entertaining to watch, standing shoulder to shoulder; Law's Watson, in fact, is no sidekick here. Though Downey Jr.’s Holmes is clearly the genius, Watson is no afterthought -- and the film is so much better for that. And yet ...

SHERLOCK HOLMES has the sooty, gritty look and feel of bygone London, and Ritchie, no surprise, brings out the franchise’s pugnacious side. (And make no mistake, it wants to be a franchise -- the movie leaves off where a sequel could handily pick right up.) Yet although we appreciate the shot of adrenaline that the director of far-edgier movies like RocknRolla and Snatch brings to the Holmes legend, Ritchie seems to have decided to film a superhero movie instead. The quick cuts and frequent action sequences are photographed like an 1890s version of Iron Man. And Downey’s 'do (and we may literally be splitting hairs here) feels out of place, as do some of the dialogue and other camerawork. Still, it’s entertaining, elementary fun.


Explore, discuss, enjoy

  • Families can talk about how this movie's take on Sherlock Holmes compares to previous ones. Why do you think the filmmakers decided to up the action and violence? How does that change the impact and appeal of the story?

  • How does Holmes arrive at his conclusions? Can you really deduct that much information from simple (albeit thorough) observation? Can you think of characters in current TV shows or movies who perform similar deductions?

  • What makes a good and lasting friendship? Are Holmes and Watson on an even level, or is Watson simply an assistant to Holmes?


This review of Sherlock Holmes was written by
Parent of 9 year old
December 18, 2009
 
For adults, this is a very engrossing movie, with Guy Ritchie's famously edgy directing style. It's not your grandmother's stodgy Sherlock Holmes story--it's very fast, full of action and interesting visual effects, and it's very dark. There's little sexual content, but the one visual you DO get is not over fast and is going to be hard to explain to kids. Lots of slow-motion takes of how Holmes fights his way out of sleuthing situations or his cage-fighting hobby (Yes! Really!), with blood and sounds of bones crunching. Again, for an adult, this is a very engaging story with a satisfying ending, but it is violent and dark.
What other families should know:

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 14 years old
February 14, 2010
 
Perfect for everyone!
Being a life-long Sherlock Holmes nut, I went to see this film with high expectations. Needless to say, I wasn't disappointed. I was reading the reviews posted previously, and I must admit I'm rather suprised at the number of people saying it's too violent or scary. I didn't think there was anything too scary in it, I even brought my 8 year old sister to it and she isn't scarred for life. Even if some scenes are a bit scary, the humour of it balances it out. I found this film a lot funnier than many comedies I've seen! Most of the jokes are perfectly appropiate, and although there are a few with double meanings, they'd usually sail right over the young 'uns heads. What I loved most about this film, however, is the friendship between Holmes and Watson. If anything, that makes the film worth seeing. The only itty bitty problem is that, although not directly shown in the film, is that Holmes is meant to be a drug addict. He doesn't take drugs in the film, though, the worst he drinks is something that Watson points out is "meant for eye surgery." I'd reccommend this film to anyone!
What other families should know:

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 11 years old
December 31, 2009
 
Why I said it was good for kids 12 and up is because a lot of it could go over their heads. We almost took my mature 10 year old brother to the movie and I am glad we didn't, because he wouldn't get much of it. This movie had amazing stunts, Laughs, (That's very fortunate since most movie that are this action packed are just serious all the time. The plot was about a man rising form the dead, that might frighten younger kids, but in the end Sherlock proves it was all a fluke. I went to Emagine to see it, and I was the only kid there. Everyone else was moctly in their 20's. I would recommend this to anyone 12 and up. This movie was very well done, and even if you aren't a mystery fanatic, you would love it!

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 0 years old
December 29, 2009
 
Very good, people are insanely over protective these days. Any Mature 7 year old (if there is a mature 7 year old out there) should be able to handle it.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 14 years old
December 28, 2009
 
Amazing Movie
I loved this movie! Robert Downey Jr. is just amazing!
What other families should know:

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 8, 12, and 14 year old
December 29, 2009
 
I don't see younger kids enjoying...only older teens.
Just got back from the movie and I'm glad I didn't take my children....my 12 year old wanted to go. It wasn't so much the violence of it that bothered me, but more of the dark tone of all the black magic stuff. Just kind of a dark movie that left me very glad I didn't live during that time period. I rated it 15 & older just because it was kind of hard to follow. It seemed to drag on a bit and I think it would be boring for those younger than that (other than all the violence, of course.) I'm definitely more of an action or romantic comedy type and this movie wasn't my cup of tea. The previews at the beginning were really bad..everything was either a horror or some kind of a sci-fi strange thing. They weren't kid friendly for anyone under 17!
What other families should know:

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 13 years old
April 10, 2011
 
Absolutely Horrible! READ THE BOOKS OR WATCH JEREMY BRETT!!!!
I hated it!! Really people!! if you want Sherlock Holmes go read the books or watch the 1984 version with Jeremy Brett and Edward Hardwicke!!! in this Sherlock Holmes it completely disfigures the gentleman image of Sherlock Holmes! in the book he is always properly dressed and never had anything to do with this lame idea of a Sherlock Holmes movie!
What other families should know:

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 15 years old
January 21, 2011
 
An amazingly fun time, but only for teens
First off, I have to say that I loved this movie. However, it is very violent and dark (e.g. dead bodys hanging from nooses, in coffins, and one naked in the bathtub, though nothing sensitive is shown), and one scene is highly sexual (again nothing explicit shown), showing a woman getting dressed in her hotel room with Holmes present (we only see her naked back, but it's implied that Holmes sees more), then drugging him. When he comes to, he is completely naked, except for a pillow covering his privates, and he is chained to the bed. A maid comes in, and seeing Holmes, gasps and drops the stuff she was carrying. Holmes tells her that "The key to my release, is beneath this pillow", and she, making a shocked face, runs out. That is all the sexuality that you will see however. Very violent fistfights abound also. In two of them, Holmes looks at his opponent, and thinks of a way to hit him that will completely disable him (you hear him thinking out his plan, so kids can memorize his technique, and it shows him acting out his plan in wince-inducing slow motion), then he does it in real time. The language isn't much worse than what you would hear on most T.V. shows, so no worrys there. I do not normally worry about drinking in movies, but in this case, I make an exception, as not only is there casual drinking, but after one particularly violent fistfight, Holmes gets extremely drunk on something apparently meant for eye surgery. Despite all this however, it is an excellent movie, depicting London at the time of the movie perfectly. Also, the script and acting are great though I will not reveal too much of the story. Also, overly religious people might be disturbed by the use of black magic by the villian. I am Christian, but this didn't really bother me. The movie also has a very good chance of causing kids to develop an interest in science and deduction as well.
What other families should know:

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 16 years old
December 30, 2009
 
wonderful
this was a movie that was done quite well. There was exceptional acting and mind blowing stunts. I would have to agree with The Trojan horse that people are insanely overprotective these days and if you have a kid who is ready to handle it then is movie is on.
What other families should know:

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 13 years old
September 5, 2010
 
Perfect for tweens and up
I love the movie but it does have some withcraft stuff in it and definitely NOT recommended for people under 11.
What other families should know:

Flag as inappropriate 

This review of Sherlock Holmes was written by
Studio:Warner Bros.
Director:Guy Ritchie
Cast:Jude Law, Rachel McAdams, Robert Downey Jr.
Genre:Action/Adventure
Run time:128 minutes
Theatrical release date:December 25, 2009
DVD release date:March 30, 2010
MPAA rating:PG-13
MPAA explanation:intense sequences of violence and action, some startling images and a scene of suggestive material

This review of Sherlock Holmes was written by
 

Review It

Share your review with others

Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.

Video review


Learning Products Quick Finder