Signs

 Review

Common Sense Media says

Excellent, but has some extreme tension and peril.
greenON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
yellowPAUSE: Know your child; some content
may not be right for some kids.
redOFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
not for kidsNOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids any age.

Find out more

Quality
 
Sometimes media can be age appropriate but a real waste of time. Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Parents say

Kids say

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that this movie has extreme tension and peril, though it's not graphic or gory. Some viewers will find it very scary. Some will be comforted by its ultimate conclusion, but others will find it disappointing, even sugary or superficial. They might even be offended at its deterministic take on things.


What's the story?

Writer/producer/director M. Night Shyamalan's latest is a story of a crisis of faith, a wise child, and something out there that is very, very disturbing but ultimately part of a pattern that supports and embraces all of us. Graham Hess (Mel Gibson) is, a recent widower who lives with his two children and his brother (Joaquin Phoenix) on a farm in Pennsylvania. He had been a minister, but lost his faith when his wife was killed. He wakes up one night with a sense of dread. His children are not in bed. He runs out into the cornfield and his children show him that the stalks have been bent into a mysterious pattern. It can't have been made by a machine, because the stalks are not broken. And it can't have been done by hand, because the shapes are too perfectly even. It turns out that the strange signs have appeared all over the world. Graham wants to believe that the shapes are a prank or a hoax. He cannot bear the thought that his family could be vulnerable to more injury or loss.


Is it any good?

 

Gibson is outstanding in a role that calls for subtlety, maturity, and a mixture of vulnerability and strength. The children, played by Rory Culkin and Abigail Breslin, are just right. They act like smart kids who know what loss is and are scared but also tantalized by what is going on around them.

Shyamalan's skills as a director are getting stronger and stronger. His use of the camera to tell the story is masterful. There is a moment when the screen goes completely black that had the audience gasping. He has clearly been paying attention to Alfred Hitchcock and Steven Spielberg, and has a few tricks of his own to contribute. His only mistake is in leaving too little to the imagination. Like his characters, he likes to have everything explained.


What families can talk about

Families can talk about whether they see patterns and purpose in what occurs around them and what it means to them. Where do people find their faith? What kind of person says that it doesn't feel right not to swing? They might also want to look at websites like this one and this one to find out more about efforts to contact life on other planets.


This review was written by Nell Minow
Parent of 10 and 12 year old
December 13, 2010
 
Waiting till they're older
I thought this was a great movie, but a little scary for kids.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 15 years old
September 30, 2010
 
Suspenseful Alien Flick
Mel Gibson has always been somewhat of an acting idol to me, and he fails to disappoint me in this movie. The fact that he made the father seem so real amazes me -- not many actors could pull off his part as beautifully as he did. However, Gibson isn't the only genius in this work of art. Shyamalan has created a strangely touching alien flick in which I thought to be virtually impossible. Brilliantly portrayed through series of brilliant actors, he has really outdone himself this time with the release of Signs. Both smart and intriguing, this must be the best of all movies relating to extra terrestrials I have ever seen. The scariest asset of all in this movie is the unknown; you can never quite tell what is around the corner and what it's all about, making it a most enjoyable experience. A message to parents: This isn't violent or as bad as some younger children around here are trying to tell you it is; most are not allowed to see anything above this age level and are trying to seem cool. The language is moderately coarse, yet it never gets out of hand. It's nothing your child/children don't hear in public or at school. This may give your child/children nightmares or scare them, so I wouldn't recommend it for anyone under eleven or twelve, as there are a few disturbing scenes such as two kids finding the corpse of a dog with a grill fork lodged in its neck. (not bloody or too disturbing) A message to kids: If you are sensitive to death or have had certain horrors in your past such as witnessing someone you love die or are frightened by many things, I would recommend waiting until you are older to view this film. It will not give you comfort and it will not bring warmth to you, only an odd feeling of insecurity and suspense. Suggested MPAA Rating: Rated PG-13 for Language, Thematic Elements, Scary Situations and Some Disturbing Images.

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 12 years old
October 23, 2010
 
I thought it was great! im11, thought the movie was creepy, but not so that a mature enough kid couldnt hav watched it. It has very mild languge, nothing any one over the age of 10 hasnt heard b4. it was violent at some parts but not enough so that a 9 or 10 year old couldnt see. not for anyone 9& under. I watched it a month ago, rewatched it at 10 last night and had no trouble sleeping afterward. not for any one who gets scared easyily. i love scary movies! first time i watched it was scaryer and second time i watched it i almost cryed because its a sad movie. scary but not to much!

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 12 years old
October 5, 2010
 
good but scary
extremely good movie but still very scary

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 13 years old
September 28, 2010
 
Let us start off by saying this is an excellently produced masterpiece with incredible acting by Mel Gibson and Rory Culkin. This movie both gave me the creeps and amazed me at the same time. There is not much to say about it other than this is one superb movie that you don't want to miss. However, there is some disturbing and somewhat frightening content and mature themes to it: -The corpse of a dog with a fork lodged in its neck is found by two small children; the scene is emotionally intense and quite disturbing. -A man cuts off three fingers off of an extra terrestrial; we briefly see its stubs and hear a harsh squeal. -The father believes that God has ignored his pleas for help and therefore does not wish for his children to believe in Christianity. When his two little kids want to pray for their dinner he revolts against it in an extremely harsh manner. The children scream and cry and he pounds the table, tears rolling down his face as well; it is not violent, but very emotional. -When the father and his children lock themselves up in the cellar, aliens attempt to get in. They start knocking on the floor and twisting the doorknob to create the illusion that they are trying to break through the front door while another sneaks through the back vent. In a jump scene, a greenish hand shoots out from the vent and grabs the son, attempting to pull him into the vent; this scene is accompanied by intense, eerie music. -The house is all barred up to prevent the invaders from getting into their house. When aliens are clearly present outside, they remember that they forgot to bring the dog inside. The scene is relatively intense/emotional; we hear the dog barking loudly for a few seconds and then a sickening crunch, followed by a silent whimper. -Near the end, an alien that had broken into their house lifts the son into its arms and excretes a toxic gas into his nostrils that evidently knocks him out. A man smashes a glass casing upon and retrieves a baseball bat and runs towards the alien, hitting it upside the head. There is an intense fighting scene in which ends with a glass of water smashing against its skin and melting through it like acid. Suggested MPAA Rating: Rated PG-13 for Thematic Material and Frightening Situations.

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 12 years old
August 10, 2010
 
should be rated r, like paul blart. like, really, is language such a minor issue that a movie with strong language is only pg-13 or pg? cmon, thats dtupid. now on to the actual movie review-not for kids. it gave my friends nightmares (when they were 10 or 11) its filled with violence, like a violent acident or a dog with a pitchfork sticking out of its chest. and language count-3 s--ts,1 d--n, 3 a-ses, one b---h, and like 3 h--ls. so i think its pretty strong (the movie with the strongest language ive ever seen at least) and some kids might have seen or played worse stuff and think this movies language is "mild" but to those kids parents it wont be.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent
June 27, 2011
 
Great Movie
It is a little scary but I think my kids can watch but only the ones that are older than the age of 9. There is a little bit of launguage but if your kid has seen Independence Day or Edward Scissorhands than this movie is fine.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 15 years old
January 6, 2011
 
Good story, but a bad script, and completely unrealistic.
I don't see how this was supposed to be a great movie. Don't get me wrong...The story was great, and so were the concepts, but the dialogue was so poorly written that I couldn't take the rest of the movie seriously. People say "smart" things to each other, but they're totally unrealistic. In a moment of fear and crisis, Mel Gibson says "I want a cheeseburger with bacon." Then he gets mad and steals some of his kids' food, then cries. Seriously? At the beginning of the movie, I felt that too much was happening too quickly. It was very interesting, but it could have been done in a better way. The actors' lines are designed to sound smart, but nobody would actually talk like that if they were in that situation. Also, the suspenseful action seems to stop just so Daddy can tell his kids how they were born. It's supposed to sound touching, but it could have been so much better. The kids seem way too fearless. The end of the earth is near, and the look on their faces just seems too numb. Mel Gibson's acting is OK, but it could have been more convincing if they gave him better lines. The presence of great-movie potential was there, but it seems like they randomly start talking about random stuff at the wrong moments. They talk about great symbolic things, but it's at the wrong moment! But on the bright side, the story is really good (it just could have presented better) and it had some suspenseful edge-of-your-seat moments.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 16 years old
August 22, 2010
 
The Scariest Things are Those You Don't See...
Signs is probably the scariest movie I've ever seen. It's actually not violent. The most graphic scene was when we see a knife sticking out of a dog, but the actual stabbing isn't shown. You see characters faces, but you rarely see what terrifies them. And that makes it all the scarier. The best part of this movie isn't the creepiness, (though Shymalan does an excellent job with it,) it's the message. This is, in many ways, a religious movie. (Shymalan isn't a Christian (too my knowledge,) but he does respect the idea of providence, which plays a large part in his thriller.) I think that that actually strengthens this film. It adds a whole lot of depth to the characters, and helps the story. I personally loved this movie, and think that it is worth seeing.

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
August 14, 2010
 
Very suspenseful. Supernatural. Sci fi
Disturbing plot. Scary. Don't see any real violence, other than the dog being stabbed. Just very very suspenseful. Characters do jump out. My favorite M Night. Joaquin Phoenix does an amazing job, even though Mel Gibson is the star.

Flag as inappropriate 

This review was written by Nell Minow
Studio:Touchstone Pictures
Director:M. Night Shyamalan
Cast:Joaquin Phoenix, Mel Gibson, Rory Culkin
Genre:Thriller
Run time:106 minutes
Theatrical release date:August 2, 2002
DVD release date:January 7, 2003
MPAA rating:PG-13
MPAA explanation:scariness

This review was written by Nell Minow
 

Review It

Share your review with others

Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.

Register now to save reviews and advice articles to your personal lists!


About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

Great alternatives handpicked by our editors

 

vote now

Will you see Signs?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Been There? Tell us about it