Wanderlust

  • Review Date: February 25, 2012
  • R
  • Genre: Comedy
  • 2012
 Review

Common Sense Media says

Mature comedy offers lots of raunchy comedy -- plus nudity.
greenON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
yellowPAUSE: Know your child; some content
may not be right for some kids.
redOFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
not for kidsNOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids any age.

Find out more

Quality
 
Sometimes media can be age appropriate but a real waste of time. Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Parents say

Kids say

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that Wanderlust -- which stars Jennifer Aniston and Paul Rudd and was produced by Judd Apatow -- delivers a lot of the same kind of very edgy material for which Apatow's other crowd-pleasing films (including Knocked Up and The 40-Year-Old Virgin) are known. There's frequent strong sexual content, full-frontal nudity (many characters are nudists), lots of strong language (including "f--k," "s--t," and many more), drinking, and drug use (pot). The jokes are raunchy, scatological, sex-charged, and plentiful.

  • Couples need to allow each other to grow in order for relationships to be successful -- but it's important to be respectful while doing so. Also, material possessions aren't everything. But neither is extremism just for the sake of extremism.
  • George and Linda care about each other a lot; they don't always make the right choices, but in the end, they hold their relationship dear. Also, there's something to be said for the commune members, who know how to live with all types of personalities and quirks. (Though that doesn't stop the movie from portraying some of them with pretty broad, semi-stereotypical strokes.)
  • Moments played for laughs include a fist fight between two men over a woman, who later joins the fracas. She also slaps her husband. A man pitches a fit in the middle of a family breakfast, throwing his plate on the floor and punching a cabinet. Later, his relative throws a plate, too.
  • Nudists walk around naked; everything, including their genitalia, is visible (in one scene, a crowd of them even runs in slow motion). Couples freely discuss swapping partners; a man discovers that his wife has slept with someone else, and he, too, flirts with someone else's partner. Lots of jokes about sex, body parts, and affairs. Loving couples kiss and snuggle with each other; one duo is shown under the covers presumably after having had sex. Male news anchors make sexist jokes about a female colleague. A woman discusses a sex toy with her sister-in-law. A woman delivers her own baby in a birth scene.
  • Very frequent strong language by most characters, including a child who says "f--k." Other words include "s--t," "ass," d--k," "p---y," "t-t," "hell," "ass," "oh my God," "goddamn," "screw" and more.
  • For a movie with a fairly anti-consumerist message, Wanderlust name-drops and displays labels a lot, including Apple MacBook, iPhone, Blackberry, Kinko's, Moet & Chandon, Embassy Suites, Wellbutrin, SkyMall, and more.
  • Lots of wine drinking and pot smoking, as well as a hallucination-inducing tea that's drunk as part of a "truth circle." Some discussions about what it's like to get high. A woman nurses margaritas and mimosas seemingly all day long to cope with her vacuous life and philandering husband.

What's the story?

George (Paul Rudd) and Linda (Jennifer Aniston) seem to have all the hallmarks of an up-and-coming New York couple: good looks, fast-paced jobs (he's a financier, she's a documentary filmmaker), and a posh downtown apartment. But then Linda fails to sell her movie to HBO, and George, who supports her financially, loses his job. Soon they're out of their apartment and heading south to Atlanta, where George's boorish, chauvinistic, racist brother (Ken Marino) and his hard-drinking, depressed wife (Michaela Watkins), are offering shelter and a soulless temp job. On the way there, they make a pit stop at Elysium, a commune -- nay, "intentional community" -- masquerading as a bed-and-breakfast led by a free-love-advocating pseudo-guru (Justin Theroux) that makes them question the way they live their lives.


Is it any good?

 

WANDERLUST has all the hallmarks of a brilliant Judd Apatow movie: raunchy humor, absurdist set-ups, and a heaping serving of the awesome Paul Rudd. With a recipe like that, how can it go wrong? And it doesn't, really; it piles up the hilarity one ridiculous situation after another until you succumb. A scene in which Rudd stares at a mirror and talks dirty to himself will leave audiences heaving in laughter.

Still, Wanderlust doesn't quite strike comedy gold. Though it's laced with seriously funny moments, it often goes for cheaper laughs. (Ha ha, naked people with real-life bodies subject to the vagaries of gravity while running! Ha ha, vegans!) When a sight gag involves a woman delivering her own baby on a front porch and later displaying the placenta (complete with the requisite eating-the-placenta joke), it's all over. Wanderlust begins with a question for our time: Is this breakneck speed, this pursuit of life, liberty, and real estate equity worth it? It answers that question, of course, and in the way we'd expect it to. But how truly brilliant would it have been if the process of coming up with the answer, as well as the answer itself (in other words, the movie) had taken a more unexpected road?


Sign Up Message
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
Each week we send a customized newsletter to our parent and teen subscribers. Parents can customize their settings to receive recommendations and parent tips based on their kids’ ages. Teens receive a version just for them with the latest reviews and top picks for movies, video games, apps, music, books, and more.
Please enter an email address.
Please check your email address for possible typos.
Sorry, you must be 13 or older to subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Sign me up!

What families can talk about

  • Families can talk about how the filmmakers deal with the fine line between being crude and being funny. Which side do they fall on more often? Who decides where that line falls to begin with?

  • Are positive take aways harder to find in this kind of movie? What stays with you longer -- the raunchy humor or the more emotional messages?

  • How does the movie portray sex? Parents, talk to your teens about your own values regarding sex and relationships.

  • Why are George and Linda drawn to Elysium? What makes a commune attractive, and what doesn't?


This review was written by S. Jhoanna Robledo
Parent
February 25, 2012
 
The ending is a cop-out, but yes, it's as raunchy as other Apatow movies...
Lots and lots of in-your-face males genitalia. Husband and I thought it was hysterical and laughed throughout the movie, but it's not for kids. Most damaging, perhaps, is the use of hallucinogenics with no real consequences...just "freeing the mind" talk. I have no hangups about the human body, either...it doesn't bother me. It's the dirty talk and drugs and bad ending that I wouldn't want my son to see. It would have made for a much more interesting film if the people at the commune were all as pure as you think they are at the beginning as they are in the end.

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 11 years old
March 2, 2012
 
Use COMMON SENSE
OK, I'll admit I haven't actually seen this movie, but look, there is naked people walking around, I mean seriously do kids actually need to see that. Plus a lot of bad language.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 14 years old
February 24, 2012
 
Nude people can't run in slo-mo?
This really doesn't deserver a higher rating than any other of Apatow's movies. Seriously, what's wrong with the human body? Not great though, don't bother until it's on dvd.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent
March 10, 2012
 
Boring.
You Americans are so prudish. Just watched the movie, found it totally boring, but the comments here are so silly.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 14 years old
April 27, 2012
 
If You Liked Role Modles You'll Love This!

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent
March 22, 2012
 
wanderlust review
it was not so bad it was kind of like the fockers movies a little worse I would say any 11 year old could watch it because there is no realy bad sex launguage just the F word wich they say a lot threw the film there is a nude scean but it only shows the mans but wich is still kind of bad. I let my 11 and 10 year old watch and they were fine with it and I dont mosly let them watch 14A movies but this one wasnt so bad

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 13 years old
March 11, 2012
 
Based on YOUR opinion.
Very raunchy and lots of language but OK for mature teens who can handle it,Nudity is an everyday thing.Just saw this with my dad as had nothing to do but I think it's personally safe just to let 13s and up.Depends on your opinion.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent
March 8, 2012
 
Funny movie, probably not for kids not near adulthood.
Wanderlust is a where a young couple disillusioned with life and the cost of living in New York City happened to get stop over at what they thought was a bed and breakfast on their way down south. They soon discover this B & B is a 60's style commune filled with people who live alternatives lifestyles. After much back and forth discussion, they decide to move into the commune with mixed results. It's soon is discovered that idealology can trump human nature This was a hillarious movie, but definitely one for adults. It features nudity (paticularly male nudity), drug use, swinging, course language. Unlike the Hangover Part II, there not any kids in the audience. A good sign.

Flag as inappropriate 

This review was written by S. Jhoanna Robledo
Studio:Universal Pictures
Director:David Wain
Cast:Jennifer Aniston, Malin Akerman, Paul Rudd
Genre:Comedy
Run time:98 minutes
Theatrical release date:February 24, 2012
MPAA rating:R
MPAA explanation:sexual content, graphic nudity, language and drug use

This review was written by S. Jhoanna Robledo
 

Review It

Share your review with others

Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.

Video review


About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

Great alternatives handpicked by our editors

 

vote now

Will you see Wanderlust?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Been There? Tell us about it