WarGames

 Review

Common Sense Media says

A war-era cautionary tale.
greenON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
yellowPAUSE: Know your child; some content
may not be right for some kids.
redOFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
not for kidsNOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids any age.

Find out more

Quality
 
Sometimes media can be age appropriate but a real waste of time. Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Parents say

Kids say

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that this film deals with mature topics such as nuclear war and nuclear holocaust, but also has as its main character a computer hacker who breaks the law without remorse.

  • The main character is a computer hacker who uses his skills for illicit purposes. For example, he infiltrates the school computer and changes his grades, with no remorse or punishment.
  • Not applicable.
  • Necking.

What's the story?

America comes to the brink of World War III when a teenager accidentally hacks into a military computer. The story begins when computer gamer David (Matthew Broderick) accidentally cracks into the Pentagon's computer system and starts to play the game "Global Thermonuclear War." But the game is real, and the fate of the world is at stake, leaving David, his friend Jennifer (Ally Sheedy), and government official McKittrick (Dabney Coleman) are in a race to stop the Pentagon computer from bombing Russia.


Is it any good?

 

Although dated in appearance, this clever and suspenseful movie questions both an over-reliance on technology and the Reagan-era defense policy. This movie makes a strong case against nuclear war, portraying it as a game of brinksmanship with no winners. It also warns against leaving the responsibility of starting a nuclear war to artificial intelligence technology. The final sequence dramatizes these dangers with simulated explosions on wall-sized screens.

Nevertheless, WarGames manages to have fun with a very serious topic. The overall atmosphere of the movie is playful, as kids ride their bikes from house to house while the fate of the world rests in their hands. The Pacman-era technology may seem hokey by today's standards, but the military command center, with its multiple screens, is still impressive. Ironically, much of the "computer" simulation was accomplished with good old-fashioned animation. The movie anticipates various technological advances, most notably the explosion of the Internet. Teens interested in computers and game theory will find much to enjoy.


What families can talk about

Families can talk about Cold War history. Also, while the movie is dated, it might be provide a way to talk about the current war, and to ask your kids about their own fears.


This review was written by Randy White
Teen, 15 years old
October 21, 2010
 
good movie
theres more sespence than scary parts

Flag as inappropriate 
Educator
November 27, 2010
 
Great discussion starter for our tech age
I love this movie, with its message that "mutual assured destruction" is indeed MAD, and that humans cannot let machines make decisions for them. There is no foolproof algorithm.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
April 9, 2008
 
Suspenseful, classic, but language is unavoidable.
I like this movie, for being a tolerable family movie for it's time. Even more, my dad's best friend's great-uncle was the General at NORAD at that time. Suspense is a good factor of this movie, hackers may not want to risk starting a nuclear war because of this. Funny, but watch out, language is present in this movie.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
April 9, 2008
 

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 12 years old
July 11, 2010
 
you should't always lisen to csm
this movie has a medium amount of language including the s-word. theres no violence but if you include a fake nucular war as violence theres plenty of it. theres a sexual joke that young kids should't hear. young kids may get scared of a few things in this movie.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
July 15, 2010
 
10 and up
I don't know what people are talking about this movie is not scary, there isn't a whole lot of language(and the language there is is very tame). At times it can be a bit intense, but nothing out and out scary.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 15 years old
February 20, 2010
 
Therre is no violence hardly any language of sexual stuff but ULTRA scary

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 15 years old
March 16, 2010
 
Iffy for ages 12-15.
I'm very surprised and disappointed with both the MPAA rating and the CSM rating. This movie has a TON of language, I was shocked to here so much swearing in a PG movie. This movie contains every, or almost every non-sexually derived swear word, and plenty of it. "PG for thematic intensity"? PLEASE. I've seen language mentioned in a PG movie for mild language such as "d--n" or "h--l". But yet they just happen not to mention language in a PG movie that has more language than many PG-13 movies? Wow. But yes, this movie definitely contains thematic intensity. My main concern would be the strong language and the scene of a sexually-themed biology class. Iffy for ages 12-15, off for 11 and under.

Flag as inappropriate 

This review was written by Randy White
Topics:adventures
Studio:MGM/UA
Director:John Badham
Cast:Ally Sheedy, Dabney Coleman, Matthew Broderick
Genre:Science Fiction
Run time:114 minutes
Theatrical release date:June 3, 1983
DVD release date:April 28, 1998
MPAA rating:PG
MPAA explanation:thematic intensity

This review was written by Randy White
 

Review It

Share your review with others

Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.

Register now to save reviews and advice articles to your personal lists!


About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

 

vote now

Will you see WarGames?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Been There? Tell us about it