See more TV reviews

Best Evidence (Discovery Channel)

common sense media says

Conspiracy theories get put to the test; tweens+.

parents & educators say
See 1 review | Review it

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that this documentary series deals with conspiracy theories, presenting evidence from all sides of a given subject and using experiments to help support or undermine it. When the subject matter calls for it -- as in an episode about the crash of TWA Flight 800 -- computer graphics re-create explosions and fires, and video footage of mangled wreckage is shown. Discussions of government cover-ups and conspiracies are at the heart of the series, and kids may need some help deciphering fact from theory. Because the series covers such a wide range of topics, parents may want to scan episode listings before giving tweens the go-ahead.

Positive messages: Demonstrates how new advances in science can help solve long-standing mysteries.
Violence: Computer-generated images and experiments can include explosions and fires, and video footage includes shots of wreckage from crashes.
Sex: Not applicable.
Language: Not applicable.
Consumerism: Not applicable.
Drinking, drugs, & smoking: Not applicable.
Our ratings and reviews are informed by child development guidelines. Learn more.

More on Best Evidence

What to talk about

Talk to your kids
Families can talk about experiments. What kinds of experiments have kids done in school? Kids: How do you identify the hypothesis you want to test? What supplies and tools do you need to record your data? What do you do if your experiment fails? What theories would you like to test? What do you expect to find? How did scientists plan the experiments they did in this episode? Were you surprised by the results? Why?

What's the story?

What's the story?
The documentary series BEST EVIDENCE presents both facts and conjecture from all sides of long-standing conspiracy theories (the existence of Bigfoot, what really happened in Roswell, etc.). Using expert testimony, eye-witness accounts, and detailed computer graphics, the series explains each theory before subjecting a key piece of evidence to scientific experiment to test its reliability. In one episode, for example, FBI investigators described how they arrived at their official ruling that a spark in a fuel tank caused the explosion that led to the crash of TWA Flight 800 in July 1996. Witnesses shared their own versions of what they saw before the plane plummeted into the ocean, and experts on the other side of the fence explained whey they believe an outside source -- like a missile -- was the reason for the disaster. Scientists then duplicated the conditions of the fuel tank in question (fuel volume, temperature, etc.) and set off a series of electrical sparks to test whether the government's claim of an explosion was possible.

Is it any good?

Is it any good?
 

Although Best Evidence offers an intriguing look at how scientific advances bring us closer to answering established mysteries, there are no definitive conclusions to be found here, which is both frustrating and thought-provoking. Parents may want to check out the subject matter of each episode before giving tweens the go-ahead, as certain topics (like plane crashes) may be upsetting to some kids. And you may want to tune in with them so you can help differentiate between fact and theory -- and so you can explain the many references to possible government conspiracies and cover-ups.

TV themes & details

TV Details
TV Rating: TV-PG
Network: Discovery Channel
Cast: Jeffrey Meldrum, John Bindernagel, Tim Martindale
Genre: Educational
Where to watch: Discovery Channel
This review was written by Emily Ashby
 
 

Review It

 

Review Best Evidence

Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.
 

Most useful reviews by all members

9001
teen, 15 years old
12
 
Iffy for ages 12-13
I didn't rate this iffy for ages 12-13 because of the content, I rated it iffy for ages 12-13 mainly because it may be hard for children to fully understand the content in this show. I think most 12 year olds and older could handle the show based on content, though.
Flag as inappropriate 
was this review useful?
helped me decide (1) | had useful details (1) | read my mind (1)

More reviews ...

An independent voice for families
Age-appropriate reviews
Advice on the big issues
 

vote now

Will you see Best Evidence?

Won't miss it
We'll try
Change it

Already seen it? What do you think?

I recommend it
It's a pass
 

Great alternatives handpicked by our editors

Browse more TV
About our rating system
ON: Content is appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child, some content may not be right for some kids
OFF: Not age appropriate for kids this age
Our child development rating guidelines