Best Evidence

 Review

Common Sense Media says

Conspiracy theories get put to the test; tweens+.
greenON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
yellowPAUSE: Know your child; some content
may not be right for some kids.
redOFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
not for kidsNOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids any age.

Find out more

Quality
 
Sometimes media can be age appropriate but a real waste of time. Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Parents say

Not yet rated

Kids say

Not yet rated

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that this documentary series deals with conspiracy theories, presenting evidence from all sides of a given subject and using experiments to help support or undermine it. When the subject matter calls for it -- as in an episode about the crash of TWA Flight 800 -- computer graphics re-create explosions and fires, and video footage of mangled wreckage is shown. Discussions of government cover-ups and conspiracies are at the heart of the series, and kids may need some help deciphering fact from theory. Because the series covers such a wide range of topics, parents may want to scan episode listings before giving tweens the go-ahead.

  • Demonstrates how new advances in science can help solve long-standing mysteries.
  • Computer-generated images and experiments can include explosions and fires, and video footage includes shots of wreckage from crashes.
  • Not applicable.

What's the story?

The documentary series BEST EVIDENCE presents both facts and conjecture from all sides of long-standing conspiracy theories (the existence of Bigfoot, what really happened in Roswell, etc.). Using expert testimony, eye-witness accounts, and detailed computer graphics, the series explains each theory before subjecting a key piece of evidence to scientific experiment to test its reliability. In one episode, for example, FBI investigators described how they arrived at their official ruling that a spark in a fuel tank caused the explosion that led to the crash of TWA Flight 800 in July 1996. Witnesses shared their own versions of what they saw before the plane plummeted into the ocean, and experts on the other side of the fence explained whey they believe an outside source -- like a missile -- was the reason for the disaster. Scientists then duplicated the conditions of the fuel tank in question (fuel volume, temperature, etc.) and set off a series of electrical sparks to test whether the government's claim of an explosion was possible.


Is it any good?

 

Although Best Evidence offers an intriguing look at how scientific advances bring us closer to answering established mysteries, there are no definitive conclusions to be found here, which is both frustrating and thought-provoking. Parents may want to check out the subject matter of each episode before giving tweens the go-ahead, as certain topics (like plane crashes) may be upsetting to some kids. And you may want to tune in with them so you can help differentiate between fact and theory -- and so you can explain the many references to possible government conspiracies and cover-ups.


Sign Up Message
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
Each week we send a customized newsletter to our parent and teen subscribers. Parents can customize their settings to receive recommendations and parent tips based on their kids’ ages. Teens receive a version just for them with the latest reviews and top picks for movies, video games, apps, music, books, and more.
Please enter an email address.
Please check your email address for possible typos.
Sorry, you must be 13 or older to subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Sign me up!

What families can talk about

Families can talk about experiments. What kinds of experiments have kids done in school? Kids: How do you identify the hypothesis you want to test? What supplies and tools do you need to record your data? What do you do if your experiment fails? What theories would you like to test? What do you expect to find? How did scientists plan the experiments they did in this episode? Were you surprised by the results? Why?


This review was written by Emily Ashby
Teen, 15 years old
February 26, 2010
 
Iffy for ages 12-13
I didn't rate this iffy for ages 12-13 because of the content, I rated it iffy for ages 12-13 mainly because it may be hard for children to fully understand the content in this show. I think most 12 year olds and older could handle the show based on content, though.

Flag as inappropriate 

This review was written by Emily Ashby
This review was written by Emily Ashby
 

Review It

Share your review with others

Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.
About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

Great alternatives handpicked by our editors

 

vote now

Will you see Best Evidence?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Been There? Tell us about it