Brainiac

 Review

Common Sense Media says

British series is more stunt work than science.
greenON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
yellowPAUSE: Know your child; some content
may not be right for some kids.
redOFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
not for kidsNOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids any age.

Find out more

Quality
 
Sometimes media can be age appropriate but a real waste of time. Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Parents say

Not yet rated

Kids say

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that this series tends to include more fiery explosions and flashy stunts than in-depth scientific experiments, but viewers will still pick up a few facts. Women often wear skimpy clothes, and they're sometimes shown in bras and underwear. Some experiments use guns; others involve drinking alcohol. The series' target audience -- tween and teen boys -- may need a reminder not to try their own experiments without some supervision.

  • What little solid scientific information there is, is often lost amid the flashy experiments.
  • Experiments often include gunshots and explosions.
  • Mild sexual undertones and scanty clothing on women, including lingerie, G-string underwear, and cleavage-revealing tops.

What's the story?

Science-minded British series BRAINIAC aims to answer burning queries like these: Can a motorcycle outrun a firework? Is X-ray vision possible? If your workspace fills with water, which office supply will make the most reliable flotation device? Each episode follows teams of men and women called Brainiacs who conduct scientific experiments to find the answers. Will tapping on a shaken soda can eliminate the fizz? Maybe you don't care, but to the Brainiacs, it's just another reason to make a mess and have some fun in the name of science.


Is it any good?

 

One thing's for sure: Fun and mess definitely seem to trump science and innovation on this show. In one segment, for example, the cast puts an airplane flight recorder to the test to find out whether it is really as indestructible as it's chalked up to be. They shoot it with a cannon, pepper it with shotgun blasts and blow it up -- only to discover that it most likely would survive a fiery crash after all.

In general, the show favors stunt work over scientific method, and the brief experiments usually include little background information or follow-up. Some real educational information is occasionally included (an explanation of how X-rays work, for example), but it's not common. The show's use of guns and explosives and the prevalence of scantily dressed women (why?) make this series somewhat iffy for tweens -- not to mention the fact that they might get some questionable ideas from the show's stunts.


Sign Up Message
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
Each week we send a customized newsletter to our parent and teen subscribers. Parents can customize their settings to receive recommendations and parent tips based on their kids’ ages. Teens receive a version just for them with the latest reviews and top picks for movies, video games, apps, music, books, and more.
Please enter an email address.
Please check your email address for possible typos.
Sorry, you must be 13 or older to subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Sign me up!

What families can talk about

Families can talk about how TV can be a learning tool. What types of shows are the most educational? Does that automatically make them boring? Why or why not? Why do you think this show features so many barely dressed women? Families can also discuss the scientific method. What steps are involved in running an experiment? Does this series do a good job of explaining the science behind the questions it answers or the tests it runs? Why or why not?


This review was written by Emily Ashby
Kid, 12 years old
April 12, 2011
 
i have just watched the t.v programme brainiac with my young son age ten.it was shown as a repeat on sky 3 channel at 4.30pm, on the afternoon of a school easter holiday. i have to say i am shocked that this is being aired when young kids can easily access it. i understood it to be aimed at children when originally shown.the episode we watched was from vic reeves period hosting.i find the women involved presenting this show so cliched, and embarrassing.one particular example was 'how hard is your thing?'where a female with breasts extruding from a tight black leather cat suit asks the male the question and he offers up a ornament of a cast iron cockerel. you can imagine the double entendres with her saying to him show me how hard your cockerel and how hard is his c**k etc etc and in a drooling drawl' i love hard things!' and so on repeatedly. the woman who did it must have been desperate, and totally ignorant not to look a the bigger picture i.e generations of women who pioneer into all our futures doing really great and remarkable work being shown up by these amoebas! poor role models for young girls and boys. stop letting the side down dumbos! and teach our kids some real science instead of this repetitive idiotic nonsense.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 16 years old
March 5, 2011
 

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 13 years old
November 15, 2009
 
Wicked show!
Good show, but with lots of half-naked women and some suggestive experiments.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent
July 29, 2011
 
Soft porn pretending to be science
Presenter parading in a bikini asking 'How hard is your thing?' while recording results using a 'hard ranker'. You might like your ten year old watching this sort of soft porn but I certainly wouldn't!

Flag as inappropriate 

This review was written by Emily Ashby
TV rating:TV-PG
Network:G4
Cast:Charlotte Hudson, Jon Tickle, Vic Reeves
Genre:Reality TV

This review was written by Emily Ashby
 

Review It

Share your review with others

Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.
About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

Great alternatives handpicked by our editors

 

vote now

Will you see Brainiac?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Been There? Tell us about it