About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

A safe community is important to us.
Please observe our guidelines.

All teen and kid reviews for Johnny Test

Age
8
Average rating based on 66 kid and teen reviews:
  • 30% say language is an issue
Kid, 10 years old
March 21, 2011
 
Lazy animation and dumb stories not the signs of a good show.
Johnny test, is a plain, normal, show which is just ugly.All I can say is that they should take the ''Test'' out of Johnny Test and replace the ''Test'' with ''Bravo'' (basically saying they should play Johnny Bravo.).All kinds of cheesy violence and phrases everywhere such as ''Darn It!'' plus potty launguage.There is some mild violenxe, but it's not a big threat.This should be popular with grade-schoolers but it's not good at all which makes it... Crappy, in one word.More for boys than family, good at some parts, but be warned, most parts are lame.Right after you watch, decide if you like this show or not.

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 11 years old
May 4, 2011
 
I like this show.
HTFMime, do I have a problem? NO!

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 15 years old
March 26, 2011
 
something for 7 and up
Great, Johnny Test is a completely imaginative show where he and dog usually make mistakes, but solve them throughout the show.

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 13 years old
June 4, 2011
 
Terrible
This TV show repeats the jokes too much, don't make any sense, and has cheesy imagination. The story is also very lazy.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 15 years old
April 8, 2011
 
Stupid, stupid, and more stupid.
This show is just plain stupid. There "jokes" are just plain annoying and rarely funny. Even when their jokes ARE funny (which happens once every fourty episodes) all it can do is make you crack a smile a bit, and they get really old too. It is a pretty cute show, but for me this isn't entertainment.

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 10 years old
January 16, 2011
 
i love it!!!!!

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 14 years old
February 22, 2011
 
Johnny's Test: B-
This is an ok show. I honestly like it a little and think it's something to watch when I'm bored. The animation may be a little cheesy and lazy, but the story, nevertheless, is compelling. I don't like how the story seems to repeat itself though. I find that in every episode, it is the same thing with a monster trying to destroy the city.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 16 years old
October 8, 2010
 
Amateurish Show
Not scott fellows greatest work though the 4th season was a massive improvement over the last 2 seasons

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 11 years old
May 30, 2011
 
Another piece of cartoon network crap
Unless you compare this show with other cartoon network crap [Which happens to be even worse] this is one of those bad kids cartoons

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
January 11, 2011
 
Not terrible
This show is not terrible compared to the other stuff they show on cartoon network. The female characters in this show are good. The sisters are intelligent and are scientist and the mother is a hard working woman. My little sisters love this show and It's okay. I think this show appeals more to little boys.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 15 years old
November 20, 2010
 
creative and cute
very cute and silly a good show for kids of all ages

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 12 years old
January 10, 2011
 
Funny
No special messages either good or bad. Just humor. No scary moments whatsoever.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 15 years old
October 26, 2010
 
Weh, there are alot of cartoon violence (no blood, no one gets injured), two sisters fell in love with a teenage hot boy in every episode, and the potty language like "stupid", "idiot", "shut up" as hard as it gets. Well, kids and teenagers will enjoy watch this or not. It seems okay though, thats all.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 16 years old
November 20, 2010
 

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 12 years old
June 2, 2011
 
THIS BOY THAT GIRL
This boy is a outgoing boy that i really like he's the same age as me and he love to do extreme stuff just like me and 2005 he still got it.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
July 11, 2011
 
Biggest waste of air time since Assy McGee!
Before I start off, let me just say...Johnny Test is the worst, most selfish, uncaring, unfunny, stupid and overall worthless protagonist for any show I have ever seen! I can't believe I actually used to kind of like this show, but yeah, I did when I was like 10. Now I look at it and say 'wow, what a piece of crap'. The whole prospect had been done to death: genius kids that can make any technology imaginable lose control of their inventions and have to stop them while learning life lessons at the same time. It's almost an exact clone of Jimmy Neutron except where that show was good, this one just hurts me. None of the characters except the dog are likeable and they never have any development; even Johnny Test himself...I mean, they try to get some messages through but you can just tell their hearts aren't in it, and by the next episode Johnny is back to being his butthole self. The villians are stupid, unfunny and have the stupidest names ever...Wacko? Mr. Mittens? Bling Bling Boy? Sounds more like a second grader's attempt at fanfiction than a show that could actually air on CN. This show just sucks. I give it two stars because I really like Dukey the dog (but yeah, even the dog's name is potty humor, that's pretty bad) because he's clever and seems to be the only character they put time into. Just stay away from this show.

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 11 years old
February 4, 2011
 
Ok For Young Kids
There is some violences with weapons and rockets. Johnny's sisters want to marry Gil and Bling-Bling wants to go out on a date with Susan Test. They sometimes lie to each other and yell.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 13 years old
December 2, 2011
 
dont watch
as a child i find this show a insult not only to my intellegence but to everyone around me to. a total insult of a show, you would get funnier entertainment watching paint dry. here is a tip, go watch regular show or adventure time with your kids. that is quality entertainment for the family.

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 11 years old
March 10, 2012
 
Crappy, More Crappy, and Even More Crappy!
This show is a pile of crap and garbage combined. I will have Scott Fellows and the groups at the Canadian Teletoon studio that I hate this show as much as Rated A for Awesome, which I tried to tell Nerd Corps is a bad show. My TV rating for Johnny Test: TV-MA-L (Mature Audiences Only--which includes scenes of crude, indecent language.! Joly Herman has this review all wrong. It's more lazy than half the shows/movies/specials they air on TV. They can't just put in some horrid occasions, testimonies, and moments because they're stuck for a good show. I think TeleToon, Cartoon Network, and Nickelodeon Germany should cancel this after its current season they are airing. They are making parodies of retro cartoons, superheroes/superheroines, and other stuff that people like. This is the biggest waste of air time since Scaredy Squirrel. It has its characters accompanied by lazy happenings, non-imaginative dimensions, and unfunny jokes. This show is a ''THIS-BAD-THAT-GOOD'' piece of Canadian crap that is more of a preschooler's attempt at fan-fiction than a show that Cartoon Network US and Nickelodeon Germany are persuaded to air. One of my 5th grade classmates/neighbors/friends told me that the show sucks after I told him I was compelled. He persuaded me that the show was uncompelling with its slangs, crude humor, and. disgusting animation. At least Nickelodeon's Spongebob is there for us at the time of our need. But THIS?!?!?!?!? THIS is just unfunny, senseless, raunchy, mindless, uncontrollably disgusting, and it is a series about ''What-the-[bleep]'' moments. Do I have a PROBLEM. YES! It's even worse than South Park, Team America: World Police, and Oragazmo! This should be called Johnny Weed or Johnny Pot or Johnny Crack! During some episodes, I actually threw up in my underwear. Such as the one with Suicide Hill. When I saw him naked, I almost felt like Johnny was going to show his penis and butt. This message from me, MovieManOfEternities, should get through all of you easily. His test: Quintuple F-minus. That is F-minus times 5. 2 sisters like expirimenting him and are obsessed with a boy named Gil. Susan is being chased by Bling-Bling, or EUGENE!!!! Why do they have to have boring and unpleasent names like Wacko, Mr. Mittens, Mr. Black, Mr. White, which are named because of their skin color, also parodying M.I.B, which is Men in Black, which other than that, the dog is named Dukey, which sounds like a word for poop, and Bling-Bling, which I mentioned, but also is named because he has shiny stuff, which is dissable. Dan Vs has better animation sequences and plots, which also would never engage in such dirty, salty, raunchy, unpleasent, senseless, mindless, uncontrollably untamable, boring, crappy, and disgusting behavior, attraction, and histories of ''What-the-[bleep]'' moments. This show is so bad, it didn't even deserve an Emmy. Scott Fellows didn't deserve an Emmy for Best Creator. TeleToon didn't deserve an Emmy for Best Canadian Channel. This show is the worst show I ever seen out of all shows in TV show history. Not even I saw any educational value. It is uneducated, perverted, and unfunny. More things: this page should say ''Off: Ages 2-12, Iffy: Ages 14-16, and On: Age 17''. This is Scott Fellows' worst work. I think we should all start a protest against Canada and its programming. It is so bad, I always roll my eyes at the TV.

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 11 years old
February 26, 2012
 
JOHNNY TEST IS TOTALLY DISGUSTING!!!
This is the worst show in America. TeleToon (Canada) thinks they can just make a very retarded show with horrid slangs like ''un-five seconds ago'' or ''dork''? 3 words: WORST SHOW EVER!!! Yup, nuff said. Whoops, a few more things. First of all, The show is so bad, that Nickelodeon aired it in Germany. Second, Scott Fellows, the creator, was a pothead at that time he created every episode. Third, the only good thing is Susan and Mary's 1000th Expirement Milestone. Fourth, the stars are bad people. Finally, Cartoon Network should cancel it after its 6th season, which is its current season. I realized since I asked to my same-age-old friend James Zell, ''Do you watch Johnny Test?'' Then, he said, ''DUDE, Johnny Test sucks.'' I replied, ''Now I know!'' At some moments in the weekend, my family forces me to watch it sometimes. The worst episode is ''Coming to a Johnny Near You'' because it insults movie history from the start, 1907, when the first theatrical movie was made.

Flag as inappropriate