The Twilight Zone (2002)

Common Sense Media says

Pop star cameos can't elevate remake of creepy classic.

Age(i)

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Quality(i)

 

What parents need to know

Positive messages

Viewers can interpret these episodes as mini morality lessons: For every action there is a consequence. However, consequences are not necessarily realistic or logical.

Positive role models

Host Forest Whitaker serves as a tour guide through the series, helping to lead audience members through the lessons or message of each episode.

Violence

Some violent situations, depending on individual episodes, include characters being hit by cars, struck by lightning, or engaging in fist fights

Sex

Sex is implied but there is no graphic sexuality.

Language

Some marginal language including "bastard" and "jackass."

Consumerism
Not applicable
Drinking, drugs, & smoking

Occasional social drinking. Some characters drink to excess.

Parents Need to Know

Parents need to know that this remake of the 1960s televison series deals in psychological tension. While there is some actual violence, it's usually more passive (i.e., a character is hit by a car) than hostile. The truly scary part of the series occurs inside viewers' minds when creepy scenarios meet supernatural elements, like mind reading, life after death, and imaginary creatures. Each episode effectively serves as a mini morality tale, so parents may want to be prepared to discuss their views on the episodes' subjects. Expect some mild language ("bastard," "jackass") and some occasional drinking.

Parents say

Kids say

What's the story?

The second remake of the 1960s series, THE TWILIGHT ZONE (2002) skews towards a younger, teenage audience than the original, and features a number of actors who would later make it big, including Hayden Christensen, Portia De Rossi, Jeremy Piven, and Robin Tunney. Each 30-minute episode is a separate, self-contained narrative, similar to the original series' set-up. The only recurring character is host Forest Whitaker, who introduces and then concludes each episode. The majority of episodes feature new storylines, though there are some remakes of original episodes, including "The Monsters Are On Maple Street" and "The Eye of the Beholder."

Is it any good?

QUALITY
 

On its own, this sci-fi series fares reasonably well. The writing is solid, and constant cameos by famous or up-and-coming actors are definitely a fun touch, especially for a teen audience (Jessica Simpson guest starring as a babysitter paranoid about a doll collection is definitely entertaining). However, it's impossible not to compare this series to the original. To ask Forest Whitaker to step
into Rod Serling's shoes is a difficult request, and the normally excellent
actor is unconvincing as the new host in the updated version of the
show. Also, the episodes aren't consistently good, and very few will pull at you for much longer than the time it takes you to watch them -- there's no similarly affecting image as that of the gremlin on the airplane wing from the original's "Nightmare at 20,000 Feet."

On the bright side, the writing is lively and imaginative, and viewers will be treated to television that will surprise with twist endings and impossible scenarios. But even though the series isn't terrible, viewers would be better served by watching the original Twilight Zone.

Families can talk about...

  • Families can talk about imagination and fear. What do you find more scary, the violence in the series or the psychological elements? How can one's imagination create more fear than the actual situation?

  • Do you think the episodes contain lessons or are they purely for entertainment? What kinds of things do these episodes make you think about?

TV details

Cast:Forest Whitaker, Jeremy Piven, Olivia d'Abo
Genre:Science Fiction
TV rating:NR
Available on:DVD

This review of The Twilight Zone (2002) was written by

About our rating system

  • ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
  • PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
  • OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
  • NOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids of any age.

Find out more

Quality

Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Learning ratings

  • Best: Really engaging, great learning approach.
  • Very Good: Engaging, good learning approach.
  • Good: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
  • Fair: Somewhat engaging, okay learning approach.
  • Not for Learning: Not recommended for learning.
  • Not for Kids: Not age-appropriate for kids; not recommended for learning.

Find out more

About our buy links

When you use our links to make a purchase, Common Sense Media earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes. As a nonprofit organization, these funds help us continue providing independent, ad-free services for educators, families, and kids while the price you pay remains the same. Thank you for your support.

See more about how we rate and review.

What parents and kids say

See all user reviews

Share your thoughts with other parents and kids Write a user review

A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines

Adult Written byMi3 February 6, 2011
AGE
11
QUALITY
 
What other families should know
Too much violence
Too much sex
Too much drinking/drugs/smoking
Teen, 14 years old Written byRunnerVision7K August 2, 2013
AGE
13
QUALITY
 

Safe for 13+

What other families should know
Too much violence
Too much sex
Too much swearing
Too much drinking/drugs/smoking

Poll

Did our review help you make an informed decision about this product?

Top Kids' Movies: An Essential Guide for Families