| ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age. | |
| PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids. | |
| OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age. | |
| NOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids any age. |
Parents need to know that the scariest part of this site is the members' unfiltered, live video chats using Web cameras that broadcast their lives, often from their bedrooms. There's no filter of what is aired and no 30-second delay. This site is also a minefield of somewhat pornographic content (suggestive photos), predatory behavior (users asking others to take off their clothes), violent images (guns, knives, blood), and anti-social messages about everything kids shouldn't do on the Internet. Users ages 14 (you can fake this) and up (including lots of adults) post their photo, age, hometown, and even sexual preference on their profile page. That info, coupled with live video from users' homes, makes this one potentially creepy place to be. And, according to The New York Times, the site doesn't always remove bad content or ban members who exhibit inappropriate behavior, especially toward minors, when it's reported. Kids will also waste a lot of time as they watch the live streams and wait for the person on the other end to do something exciting.
The Premise: Use the STICKAM "player" on your own site or blog to instantly play live videos, photo slide shows, or music. Or if you don't have your own site, simply use Stickam to create your own free profile page to post multimedia content, to chat, and to comment on other users' content.
The Reality: It's hard to understate the scary content on this site. Babyfaced (nearly?) teens avow their loneliness and bisexuality on this site where middle-aged men need not register and can view a lot of content. Members put on makeshift talk shows, flirt with other members in video chat rooms, and often, if they are female, field repeated requests to take off their clothes. The site owners' nearly complete disavowal of any responsibility to monitor content (Parents: Get a filter to block out STICKAM, they suggest) is no surprise considering that the company's been in the news quite a bit lately for not taking down reported inappropriate content. File STICKAM.COM under "Online Recipe for Disaster."
Families can talk about why posting photos, personal information, and especially live video of yourself in your bedroom online to people you don't know is dangerous. What's the appeal of opening yourself (and your racy photos) up to others online? Even if there are a couple of safety features on a site -- such as banning an individual from viewing your video player or reporting abuse -- why shouldn't teens rely on a site administrator to keep them safe?
| Genre: | Video Sites |
Contact us to give us more feedback on our learning ratings.
Tell us what you think about our new Learning Ratings. We value your feedback.