Want personalized picks that fit your family?

Set preferences to see our top age-appropriate picks for your kids.

Get age-based picks

Kenny and the Dragon

Book review by
Matt Berman, Common Sense Media
Kenny and the Dragon Book Poster Image
Reluctant Dragon remake has less charm.

Parents say

age 5+
Based on 2 reviews

Kids say

age 9+
Based on 2 reviews

A lot or a little?

The parents' guide to what's in this book.

Positive Messages

Kenny, his parents, George, and the dragon are all goodhearted and kind, and willing to listen to a child.

Violence & Scariness

One fake fight.


What parents need to know

Parents need to know that there is not much to worry about here. Adults smoke pipes and drink ale.

User Reviews

  • Parents say
  • Kids say
Parent of a 2 and 5 year old Written byWackoRobie November 30, 2009
Adult Written bycoraisabel November 23, 2018


Creative. The message and art inspires kids. I remember reading this when I was younger and loved it. The art inspired me and stayed without me throughout time... Continue reading
Kid, 9 years old May 2, 2012


I think it's an amazing book. You should try it!!!!!!!!
Kid, 9 years old February 17, 2011

good book

This book is a very good book with a good story i think it is for ages 9+ because people smoke pipes and drink ale.otherwise it is a good book

What's the story?

Kenny, a book-loving rabbit, meets a dragon named Grahame, who loves Shakespeare and creme brulee. This gentle dragon and Kenny soon become friends. Kenny's only other friend is George, an elderly badger who runs the local bookstore. When the townscritters discover that there's a dragon living nearby, they turn to George, a former knight, to slay it. Now Kenny must figure out a way to keep his two friends from fighting.

Is it any good?

As a remake of the original, this book is both unnecessary and lacking in the charm (not to mention originality of concept) that made Grahame/Shepard's book so appealing. 

The movie industry has long indulged in remaking older movies. With occasional exceptions, this has been a disaster. It's not hard to see why: if the original movie was worth remaking, it was probably pretty darn good to begin with, and the update usually loses the qualities that made the original a classic. Fortunately, this trend has mostly been confined to film -- until now. Tony DiTerlizzi, half of the team that created the original and delightful Spiderwick Chronicles has chosen to rewrite and re-illustrate the classic The Reluctant Dragon by Kenneth Grahame (whose most famous book is the classic The Wind in the Willows), and illustrated by Ernest Shepard (famed for his brilliant drawings for Winnie-the-Pooh).

For reasons best known to himself, DiTerlizzi's update includes changing all the characters to animals -- perhaps he just enjoys drawing them more. He also includes many references to The Reluctant Dragon, including naming the main character Kenny, the dragon Grahame, the hill where they live Shepard Hill, and even working in a direct mention of the original book. Standing on its own, this story is pleasant and enjoyable. But the original is still in print (alas, there are many newer editions done by other illustrators -- look for the edition with the original, delightfully insouciant Shepard drawings that so clearly show the virtues of simplicity) -- so why not get it instead?

Talk to your kids about ...

  • Families can talk about this idea of remaking someone else's book. Why would an author do it? Is it OK if he acknowledges it? Is it copying or a way of showing admiration? Children who read this might be interested in reading the earlier version and comparing the two. Why would a modern author think the older book needs to be rewritten?

Book details

Our editors recommend

Top advice and articles

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are created by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.

See how we rate

About these links

Common Sense Media, a nonprofit organization, earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes when you use our links to make a purchase. Thank you for your support.

Read more

Our ratings are based on child development best practices. We display the minimum age for which content is developmentally appropriate. The star rating reflects overall quality and learning potential.

Learn how we rate