Your privacy is important to us. When you sign up as an advocate:
- Common Sense Kids Action will send you periodic email alerts on legislative activity that affects your community.
By providing us with your email address and clicking the submit button (above), you acknowledge and agree to the above.
Search by Age and Topic
Follow Common Sense
Congress heading in wrong direction on protecting data security of American families, including kids
Another day, another data breach. Just before Thanksgiving, millions of children's photos, audio recordings, and private conversations with parents were exposed when popular toy manufacturer VTech suffered a data breach. Up to 11 million parents and children were affected.
Such occurrences are likely to occur more often as more and more connected toys -- many with questionable security mechanisms -- make their way into families' homes.
Data breaches affect Americans in all facets of their lives, from financial accounts to health information, emails to school records, and now even children’s playthings.
Yet, despite lots of talk on Capitol Hill, Congress still hasn't enacted meaningful data security and breach legislation. And now, the House of Representatives is considering just the opposite: HR 2205 would actually weaken many protections for Americans. It would supersede stronger state laws and prohibit innovation at the state level. It would eliminate key protections under existing federal law. And it only offers safeguards for certain types of data, offering no protections, for example, for children’s photographs or private family conversations and videos.
Congress appears to be heading in the wrong direction. That’s why Common Sense Kids Action has joined other leading privacy and consumer advocates in asking Congress to oppose this bill.
As more and more aspects of our daily lives become vulnerable to hacking, we need strong data breach laws that provide broad protections for our private and sensitive information. Because HR 2205 does not provide such protections -- and would prohibit states from providing them -- we oppose it.