Eagle vs. Shark

  • Review Date: January 8, 2008
  • Rated: R
  • Genre: Comedy
  • Release Year: 2007
  • Running Time: 88 minutes

Common Sense Media says

Geek-love rom-com from New Zealand has bite.
  • Review Date: January 8, 2008
  • Rated: R
  • Genre: Comedy
  • Release Year: 2007
  • Running Time: 88 minutes

Age(i)

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Quality(i)

 

What parents need to know

Positive messages

Jarrod's a self-described "loser," and he proves himself right. He talks mostly about himself, shows little concern for those around him, prank calls people and threatens them, stands up and then dumps a woman who's only been nice to him, name-calls his sister, exhibits violent tendencies (he punches things out of nowhere), ignores his child, and even beats up a paraplegic. By contrast, Lily is warm and kind and giving, which somewhat mitigates Jarrod's awfulness.

Violence

Jarrod stalks a former childhood nemesis by phone and threatens him; later he beats him up while he's in a wheelchair. Guests gleefully beat each other via video games at a party, and then throw shoes at one of the hosts, who volunteers to play target.

Sex

Glimpses of porn (showing full intercourse) pop up on a computer. Lily and Jarrod have sex, but with little emotion (at least the first time) -- no body parts are visible except for Lily's bare shoulders, though there's an audible sound of a condom being put on. Also some discussion of sex in frank terms ("That was some good sex last night"). Lily tears off her top after a party and runs into the night (only her bare back is visible).

Language

Very colorful, including various slang for male genitalia ("c--k," etc.), "bitch" (and its alternate version, "beeyatch"), and a few uses of "f--k."

Consumerism

Signage for Meaty Boy, the fictional fast food restaurant where Lily works; mention of the Ford Laser (a real car).

Drinking, drugs, & smoking

Some smoking and drinking, mostly at parties; at one particular bash, Lily gets completely drunk.

Parents Need to Know

Parents need to know that this quirky New Zealand film has a following on YouTube, so teens may already have seen clips of it there. Quirky and a bit dark, it's far from your typical romantic comedy. The main character, Jarrod, is off-putting, callous, and rude, and at times his relationship with the female lead feels masochistic. There are plenty of dark moments (including glimpses at a family torn apart by suicide), as well as lots of strong language ("f--k", variations on slang for male genitalia, and more). There's also a definite undercurrent of violence: Jarrod is a champ at beating opponents in an aggression-filled video game, and he trains to beat up a childhood bully. Still, older teens may be able to see beyond Jarrod's unappealing exterior -- especially since his sweet-though-gawky girlfriend seems to be able to find some good in him.

Parents say

Not yet rated
Review this title!

Kids say

Not yet rated
Review this title!

What's the story?

In this quirky romantic comedy, gawky frump Lily (Loren Horsley), a fast food restaurant cashier, develops a major crush on a store clerk who comes in every day for lunch. To Lily, Jarrod (Jemaine Clement) is a dreamboat hero. In reality, he's a clumsy, insecure goof who puts others down, including his biggest fan, Lily. It's a monumental feat: He really is, as he later describes himself, a "loser." For example, at a costume party he says he likes her shark costume but that his eagle outfit is "cooler." And the day after they first sleep together, he tells her, "That was some good sex last night, eh?" Then, when she helps him get to his hometown so he can complete what he claims is his "revenge mission" (beating up his childhood nemesis), he repays her by breaking up with her.

Is it any good?

QUALITY
 

Overall the film is pretty funny and Loren Horsley imbues her character with both pathos and grace. But Clement comes across as so despicable that some viewers may find him too pathetic to love. The fun he pokes at geek- and jerk-dom is almost too pointed -- which makes it a challenge to buy Lily's utter devotion. Though awkward, she's dignified, big-hearted, and generous in spirit.

Writer-director Taika Waititi's deserves applause for his zeal, which results in a fairly successful and mostly hilarious -- though not always palatable -- film. The movie, after all, is about there being someone for everyone, even bona fide losers -- and Jarrod's a complete dud. Hollywood has told this story before, but the "losers" are never total washouts: They're more like ugly ducklings who only need a makeover to come out a swan. It would take major plastic surgery and a personality transplant to make Jarrod a swan.

Families can talk about...

  • Families can talk about how this cinematic romance bucks the Hollywood trend. Is it believable? Does the "there's someone for everyone" message come off as hopeful or sad (i.e. some people have to settle for "losers")? Then again, is the typical Hollywood romantic comedy any more believable? Families can also discuss how video and computer games are presented in the movie -- and read more about the link between video games and violence.

Movie details

Theatrical release date:June 15, 2007
DVD release date:January 8, 2008
Cast:Jemaine Clement, Loren Horsley, Rachel House
Director:Taika Waititi
Studio:Miramax
Genre:Comedy
Run time:88 minutes
MPAA rating:R
MPAA explanation:language, some sexuality, and brief animated violence.

This review of Eagle vs. Shark was written by

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are conducted by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.

About our rating system

  • ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
  • PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
  • OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
  • NOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids of any age.

Find out more

Quality

Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Learning ratings

  • Best: Really engaging; great learning approach.
  • Very Good: Engaging; good learning approach.
  • Good: Pretty engaging; good learning approach.
  • Fair: Somewhat engaging; OK learning approach.
  • Not for Learning: Not recommended for learning.
  • Not for Kids: Not age-appropriate for kids; not recommended for learning.

Find out more

About our buy links

When you use our links to make a purchase, Common Sense Media earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes. As a nonprofit organization, these funds help us continue providing independent, ad-free services for educators, families, and kids while the price you pay remains the same. Thank you for your support.
Read more

See more about how we rate and review.

What parents and kids say

See all user reviews

Share your thoughts with other parents and kids Write a user review

A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines

Adult Written byGrady508 April 9, 2008
AGENot rated for age
QUALITY
 

Pretty much the worst filom of the history

sucks.

Poll

Did our review help you make an informed decision about this product?

Essential School Tools