All member reviews for The Transporter

About our rating system

  • ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
  • PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
  • OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
  • NOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids of any age.

Find out more

Quality

Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Learning ratings

  • Best: Really engaging; great learning approach.
  • Very Good: Engaging; good learning approach.
  • Good: Pretty engaging; good learning approach.
  • Fair: Somewhat engaging; OK learning approach.
  • Not for Learning: Not recommended for learning.
  • Not for Kids: Not age-appropriate for kids; not recommended for learning.

Find out more

Kids say

(out of 9 reviews)
AGE
12
QUALITY
 
Review this title!
Kid, 11 years old February 2, 2012
AGE
6
QUALITY
 

Jason Statham YEAH

Jason Statham kicks butt with his BMW and will knock you into a long sleep!
What other families should know
Too much consumerism
Teen, 14 years old Written bySpielberg00 December 3, 2011
AGE
13
QUALITY
 

Good, but kinda silly.

My rating: PG-13 for intense action violence and some language. Violence: 3.5/5 - Lots of action; blood on a window. Language: 3/5 - A few uses of "s--t".
What other families should know
Too much violence
Too much swearing
Teen, 15 years old Written byErrweb March 30, 2010
AGE
12
QUALITY
 

An all Action Movie!

It is a great action movie,even though I must admit Transporter 3 is even better . One of the best parts was when Frank rang the bell and broke down the door, the martial art fights are also pretty impressive. The main concern are: many people are killed and the characters tend to use strong language.
What other families should know
Too much violence
Too much swearing
Kid, 12 years old August 16, 2014
AGE
11
QUALITY
 

Enterp action flick is sure to please audiences

Teen, 14 years old Written byCWG1 June 20, 2013
AGE
8
QUALITY
 

A fun action packed movie.

I really enjoyed this movie. It does contain some violence, but it is PG-13 so it is not bad not very much blood at all. Some typical PG-13 Language. A brief scene of two people kissing in there underwear and then lay down and the scene cuts. My youngest sister handled it and she was about 8 or 9 at the time.
What other families should know
Great role models
Too much violence
Too much sex
Too much swearing
Too much drinking/drugs/smoking
Kid, 10 years old May 27, 2011
AGE
15
QUALITY
 

good for teens

Really good movie. REALLY violent.
What other families should know
Too much violence
Too much sex
Too much swearing
Too much drinking/drugs/smoking
Teen, 13 years old Written byerik252 May 1, 2010
AGE
14
QUALITY
 
great movie but defiently for older kids
What other families should know
Too much violence
Too much swearing
Teen, 13 years old Written byiluvzmoosyk April 17, 2009
AGE
13
QUALITY
 

Transporter 3 and 2 were better...

Very good... but I liked Transporter 2 and 3 more. Good for ages 13+ -i love dogs
What other families should know
Too much violence
Too much sex
Too much swearing
Too much consumerism
Too much drinking/drugs/smoking
Teen, 13 years old Written byjames brown April 9, 2008
AGENot rated for age
QUALITY
 

If you could do half stars I would give it a 4 and a half

I love Classy movies that are in places like itly (The Italin Job, Oceans Twelve ect.) this is a new favoret... but I'm not shure me Common Sense saw the same movie? they say the s-word four times and thats all the languge. I just fastforwarded over the itsy-bitsy scene right before sex is implied. there was a lot of violence but it is very "styleized" (think japanese kung foo movie). this is not half as bad as common sense made it out to be. you should deffinitly see it! 12 and up is a go!