"Nothing to Lose" (featuring Miley Cyrus)

Music review by
Stephanie Bruzzese, Common Sense Media
"Nothing to Lose" (featuring Miley Cyrus) Music Poster Image
Miley’s duet with older man is too creepy for youngest fans.

Parents say

age 10+
Based on 1 review

Kids say

age 11+
Based on 6 reviews

A lot or a little?

The parents' guide to what's in this music.

Positive Messages

The song's message of falling for someone is pretty tame, but the combination of the 47-year-old Michaels and 17-year-old Cyrus singing a song about love sets a strange tone.

Positive Role Models & Representations

Bret Michaels has done some hard living, making no secret of his partying and womanizing ways. Miley Cyrus, however, has been a good role model for kids so far in her young career.

Violence
Sex

Though there are no graphic discussions of sex, the repeated line "won't you fall down on me" is clearly a reference to it -- which is reinforced by the lyric "slowly get undressed."

Language
Consumerism
Drinking, Drugs & Smoking

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that Miley Cyrus tries to show her growing maturity by participating in this song with the much older Bret Michaels (former frontman of the hair-band Poison and recent star of the reality dating show Rock of Love). While the tune doesn't include swearing or graphic adult content, it does make light references to sex that are underscored by Michaels' personal reputation for partying and womanizing.

User Reviews

  • Parents say
  • Kids say

There aren't any reviews yet. Be the first to review this title.

Kid, 11 years old April 3, 2011

Miley Cyrus is beautiful and a good singer

I do like Miley Cyrus but I do not like Hanna Montana that much.
Teen, 16 years old Written bylalaland503 June 14, 2011

don't waste you're time

I don't think that they should be singing together at all in my point of view.I mean why doesn't she sing with Selena Gomez or Demi Lovato or somethin... Continue reading

What's the story?

In what may be one of the oddest musical pairings in a while, Bret Michaels -- former lead singer of the notoriously naughty '90s rock band Poison -- and teen singing queen Miley Cyrus have teamed up in the single "NOTHING TO LOSE." Originally cut by Michaels himself, the two re-released it as a duo, with Cyrus lending backup vocals to Michaels' main performance. The tune chronicles the beginnings of a love affair between two people who've been hurt before -- an innocent enough concept that's explained here with no foul language or explicit sexual descriptions. That said, the track does make an unmistakable mention of sex in the lyrics: "won't you fall down on me" and "slowly get undressed," a reference that seems more awkward in light of the extreme differences in both age and reputation between Michaels and Cyrus.

Is it any good?

When '90s hair bands were big, Bret Michaels and his band Poison could get away with hiding their mediocre talent behind big hair and lots of theatrics. Now that the era and its styles are over, all that's left is Michaels' middling voice. Cyrus doesn't do much better in this track, with some lines that sound downright off-key. Coupled with a boring country-pop hook and the weird age difference between the two artists, and this song seems just plain silly.

Talk to your kids about ...

  • Families can talk about whether it's appropriate for Bret Michaels and Miley Cyrus to be singing a song about romantic love together, in light of their 30-year age difference. Even though it's just a singing performance, is it OK for Michaels and Cyrus to do this? Why or why not?

  • Does Miley Cyrus help or hurt her career by pairing up with Michaels?

Music details

Our editors recommend

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are created by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.

See how we rate

About these links

Common Sense Media, a nonprofit organization, earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes when you use our links to make a purchase. Thank you for your support.

Read more

Our ratings are based on child development best practices. We display the minimum age for which content is developmentally appropriate. The star rating reflects overall quality and learning potential.

Learn how we rate