That's Impossible

Show about unlikely scientific advances is repetitive, thin.

What parents need to know

Positive messages

Sends the message that advanced technology can do the seemingly impossible -- even though many of the most amazing feats may be hidden behind walls of government secrecy. Many of the experts' assertions are based on suppositions and educated guesses rather than fact, which is a little iffy.

Positive role models

Brilliant scientists, through hard work and dogged determination, just might be able to pull off the impossible.


Some non-graphic computer animations of simulated combat.

Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Drinking, drugs, & smoking
Not applicable

Parents Need to Know

Parents need to know that this educational series about the thin line between cutting-edge science and the incredible depends heavily on speculation from experts, who often discuss classified military projects and advanced research. There’s a big emphasis on how some emerging technology can be used as weapons, though there’s no direct violence. There aren't any other strong parental red flags, either, but the show may not be compelling enough to really grab kids' attention.

User reviews

Parents say

Not yet rated
Review this title!

Kids say

Not yet rated
Review this title!

What's the story?

It's a short distance between the most advanced scientific research and the supposedly unachievable; THAT’S IMPOSSIBLE tries to explain exactly what scientists can do now -- and what it would take to move to the next step. In other words, narrator Jonathan Frakes and a variety of experts discuss whether something that's "impossible" now will soon be within our reach. The series combines historical footage and computer animations to first examine concepts like invisibility, weather control, and robotic soldiers and then speculate how learning to master them could change the world.

Is it any good?


The show's producers have tracked down some of the world’s top scientists, and it’s fascinating to watch them demonstrate truly amazing breakthroughs. But the show wants to go further; instead of seeing, for example, a cloak that uses advanced photographic technology to simulate near invisibility in a lab, it tries to convince us that true invisibility may already be possible.

In this, it reaches too far. Much of the show's speculation is based on rumors about secret military projects, some still secret. As a result, the show has little to go on, and the experts can only skim the surface of these concepts. Hearing some talking head tell thinly substantiated stories about a classified effort to make a tank invisible isn't compelling. Frakes repeats the experts' claims, sometimes more than once, using tepid computer animations ... but no real evidence. Hearing wild assertions repeated feels like padding. We don’t need an expert to tell us that rendering soldiers and tanks invisible would give an army an big strategic advantage, and we certainly don’t need them to make the same obvious point over and over.

Families can talk about...

  • Families can talk about technology and the military. Why do so many advanced scientific breakthroughs get used as weapons? Do you think the military should have first dibs on cutting-edge research? Can you think of non-violent applications for some of the ideas presented here?

  • Also, some of the alleged breakthroughs presented here are the result of classified projects that are still secret. Why do you think the government and other large organizations might choose to hide things from the public?

TV details

Cast:Jonathan Frakes
TV rating:TV-PG

This review of That's Impossible was written by

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are conducted by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.


Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Learning ratings

  • Best: Really engaging; great learning approach.
  • Very Good: Engaging; good learning approach.
  • Good: Pretty engaging; good learning approach.
  • Fair: Somewhat engaging; OK learning approach.
  • Not for Learning: Not recommended for learning.
  • Not for Kids: Not age-appropriate for kids; not recommended for learning.

Find out more

About our buy links

When you use our links to make a purchase, Common Sense Media earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes. As a nonprofit organization, these funds help us continue providing independent, ad-free services for educators, families, and kids while the price you pay remains the same. Thank you for your support.
Read more

See more about how we rate and review.

About Our Rating System

The age displayed for each title is the minimum one for which it's developmentally appropriate. We recently updated all of our reviews to show only this age, rather than the multi-color "slider." Get more information about our ratings.

What parents and kids say

Write a user reviewThere aren't any reviews yet. Be the first to review this title.


Did our review help you make an informed decision about this product?

Digital Compass