About our rating system
ON: Content is appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child, some content may not be right for some kids
OFF: Not age appropriate for kids this age

A safe community is important to us.
Please observe our guidelines.

All member reviews for Battlefield 1943

Swit Swat
kid, 12 years old
 
Amazing first-person shooter is great fun for teens!
I have to say I really enjoy this game. One reason is because there is no blood. I like first-person shooters, but I just can't stand the bloody ones, which are like almost all of them. So, it's kind of nice to play this kind of game with no blood. So, with no blood, it is a little more age appropriate for teens. With realistic environments and amazing combat action, this game deserves 5 stars!

Secretagentbob
teen, 15 years old
 
Not as violent as other shooting games, but not as good either.
Its OK, but on most islands you have to swim about 10 miles to get to the action, and theres no escape once someone starts shooting you, since you have VERY low health. But if they just fixed those two things, it would be great.

PS3Beast
teen, 14 years old
 
Battlefeild:1943 isnt as violent as most WWll games.
Battlefield:1943 is a better choice for kids than games like World at War or Brothers in Arms, because its blood and language free, and its alot cheaper, too. The violence isnt super intense but its First Person, and another problem is that you can play as the Imperial Navy and kill american soilders. Its still a great game though, but there are still a few problems they could fix to make it easier.

fartnugetts
kid, 13 years old
 
you are fighting for america

somebody
teen, 13 years old
 
good for teens+
Its not too violent, but it is an FPS, and you have chat.

Hsetlik
teen, 14 years old
 
Great Game for (almost) everyone
I started playing tis game's prequel at age 10, there is no blood and the gore is not excessive. My only concerns are nasty choking sounds that enemies make when they die, and the immorality of playing as the axis,which can be encouraged, because they have better weapons

 
Battlefield 1943 shows hope for the future of downloadable video games
Battlefield 1943 is an exciting First-Person-Shooter in which the player is either Japanese or American soldier fighting on 1 of 5 Japanese islands during the course of WWII. The plotline focuses on the war itself, therefore it is needless of an additional storyline. (I.E: a soldier trying to survive in order to get back to his family) Players shoot, blast, slash and impale infantry as well as mow them to the ground with war tanks or cars. Additionally, every soldier has the opportunity to launch a bombing raid or simply hop in a plane then aim & fire at whatever vehicle or person they find scattered about the island. The goal of the game is simple: capture the flags and kill anyone who stands in your way. While there aren't spurts of blood when a soldier is shot or an arm flying half way across the screen when someone hurls a grenade, the combat isn't any less fun than that of a Call of Duty game. With realistic graphics and smooth gameplay at the low cost of $15.00, it's the ideal choice if you are in search of a good war game without the blood and gore or waste of gasoline on the trip to GameStop.

Blue Dragon
kid, 11 years old
 
Beast, and if you want something even less violent, go with Cell Factor.
Battlefield has always been a great series, and this is the best yet. Some things are really glitchy, like the Sniper Rifles being VERY underpowered, or random air raids that have almost no escape. Its probably still the best in the series, but not quite as good as Warhawk or Conduit though. One other thing is that its probably the closest to WAW you can get without all the blood and cussing, so get this or any Battlefield before you get COD.

safegamer15
teen, 16 years old
 
Great Game
Battlefield 1943 is a great game. This game is much less violent than almost any other shooting game I have played. Although there is shooting, there is no blood, gore, or incentive for head-shots. It's interesting because it is staged in world war 2, and is played where major ww2 battles were fought: battles that you learned about in history class. Parents should know that it is an online game in which you can talk to other players. Atlthogh you have this choice, you don't have to communicate with other players. All around, this is a great game.

 
This game is fun!

perfect review
parent of 12 year old
 
fine for 10 and up
It's a fantastic game my son loves it and its taught him a lot about world war 1. no online talking unless you have the bluetouth.

Dylan6648
teen, 14 years old
 
A lot of fun
This game is just awesome. you fight historical battles online with other people.So you can talk to people.but you dont have to. there is constant violence, but nothing you wouldnt see in a war movie. the graphics are top notch too.

 
Only for Kids 13+
I believe that this game does not promote violence. This is a remake of the original. The original briefed you on both sides of the war with basic facts. This is for those die hard Battlefield fans who would love to see the original remade onto next gen consoles. It also has easy gameplay fr the newcomers and first person shooter fan. Also on another note hardly anyone uses a microphone for voice chat. Even if they do it is either broken up or too quiet to hear. You can also mute players who are verbally abusing or just an annoyance. Respectively this game is mainly for those who want to re-live their favorite pacific battles of the original 1942.

epic lion
kid, 11 years old
 
if they can make such a great multiplayer mode why cant they make a campaign???
I had a lot of fun playing BF 1943, and it doesnt have blood or language so it might be a good game for people who aren't allowed to play COD. There is some violence (which you should probably know just by seeing the title) where you kill enemies with rifles, machine guns, grenades, turrets, and bayonetts, and you can also use jeeps, tanks, and planes to kill people. Also some parents might be concerned that online you can play on the japanese side and kill americans.

goodmom123
parent of 11 year old
 
Perfect for tweens and up.
This is a very good game for tweens and up. Especially if you don't like Call of Duty because this game is not violent compared to Call of Duty. This game is great because it is fun for the kids and it teaches them about trench warfare and various things about world ar 2 and you are never killing innocent people. When people "die" they just falll down no blood.

Themistocles2
kid, 12 years old
 
Lock, load, and scream like you've never screamed before.
Battlefield: 1943 is one of the best games around. It combines fascinating settings, a variety of weapons and vehicles and the good, plain fun of randomly blowing things up with a rocket-propelled grenade. Deaths are not by any means scary; players fall to the ground when shot, and are flung a few yards when killed by an explosion. Blood is absent. Soldiers will sometimes shout mild curses, but they are hard to hear with the whole 'war' thing going on in the background. If your child wants a violent game like Battlefield: Bad Co. 2 or Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, ask them to consider this instead. They'll probably like like it. DISMISSED!

peteinator
teen, 13 years old
 
i love it! i just got it today, but ive played it once and its fun. but still, its a bit iffier than call of duty, bloodwise.

crissreviews
teen, 14 years old
 
Epic, but it does have some quirks
First of all I don't think this game should be 'iffy' for 13 year olds. There is no blood, but the battles are epic, so it's mostly the parent's call and based on the kid for that one. The game is a very high quality game as downloadable games go. It puts you right into an up to 24 person battle complete with tanks, planes, jeeps, transport ships, and air raids you can call in. Like the other battlefield games there are bases to capture across the map, and as you capture bases and kill enemies the opposing team's team life bar thingy decreases. The game has three great island maps: Wake Island, Iwo Jima, and Guadalcanal. There is also an Air Superiority one which is a dogfight and that is a separate option. You may expect with such big maps that you might find yourself far from the main battles and just running across the map trying to get to the battle. That is not the case with Battlefield 1943. When you are choosing where to spawn it shows crossed rifles on the base in question, so you can spawn there and fight. That icon is also sort of like a gps thing you get when you are running around. Another thing that helps you get right into the battle is the squad system. When you join you may join a squad and when you die you can choose a living squad member to respawn next to. To add to the great action, the buildings will blow up or catch fire when it makes sense, just like every other part of the map. No longer will tanks have to carefully weave around trees and fences. In Battlefield 1943 you can barrel them down, or bazooka them down. And say you're driving a tank and someone steps out of a building, shoots a shell at you, and then ducks back into the building. No problem, just blast the wall and it will collapse, revealing the player or killing them. There are three classes, none of which are overpowered. Another thing that makes the battles epic is if you control a base that has a radio dish pillbox you can use it to control a formation of three bombers and do a whole wave of bombs over the battlefield. Now for the small problems with the game. First of all, I still don't know if it's the game or my wifi but I've been having lag issues on and off. One day it's running fine, then the next morning my guy is running past the same rock three times. The other problem is I hate the controls on the jeeps. On the Playstation 2 X has always been gas, but now somebody decided L1 could be gas and L2 is brakes. This is fine with the tank because if you're using X to speed up you can't use that thumb to aim the turret, but there's no point to it with the jeep. Lastly the tanks are WAAAY overpowered. I know tanks are supposed to dominate a war realistically but I don't think it's fair that these tanks have 360 degree rotating turrets with not only a shell launcher but a machine gun, both of which are controlled by the driver. If another person goes on top, it is virtually unstoppable because I think it takes more than 2 bazooka hits, but I'm not positive because I never get a second one in! The scouts have the ability to plant remotely detonated charges so they should be able to run up and do so while the main gun is reloading but really if they try that the driver-controlled secondary machine gun gets them.

Rollacoastalex
teen, 15 years old
 
Perfect for 12+, below is debatable.
Less violent than other Battlefield games (ex. Battlefield Bad Company) and no profanity. Unless you talk to other people online, who you can simply mute. Basically a Team Deathmatch (a online mode from the Call of Duty series) but with a capture the flag twist. NO STORYLINE. This game is just online play.

Cape Cd
kid, 12 years old
 
Not as bad as it looks, actually.
It's mostly a clean game, with only two concerns. One is the screams of pain. This shouldn't be a problem if you're child is mature and won't be scared by this. The other problem is the ability to run people over. As long as your child knows it's just a game, he/she should be fine.