Game Details
Price
  • $59.99
Available on
Genre
More details

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (Xbox 360, PlayStation 3, Windows)

common sense media says

Mature shooter with controversial terrorist mission.


parents & educators say
  • 45% say violence is an issue
  • 42% say language is an issue

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that, while not over-the-top in the gore department, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 is a modern-day military shooter that realistically and graphically shows violence and blood. Much of the game involves traveling to different areas of the world to take down baddies with an assortment of weapons, all played from a first-person perspective. One of the locations is Washington D.C., which is shown as being under attack by Russian troops. In a controversial optional mission, players go undercover to infiltrate a terrorist group and end up participating in a terrorist attack on an airport. As players witness the horrors of innocent civilians being shot, they must make the moral decision whether to join in by shooting bystanders or to walk on by and ignore their screams of pain (gamers are not rewarded or penalized for any action or inaction they take during this scene). The game does contain some profanity and references to drugs, but it's the realistic violence in disturbing settings that is of more concern.

Educational value: It's not much of a stretch to argue this game might teach military tactics, combat techniques.
Positive messages: This is a tricky one. While you are a "good guy," out to protect the free world, the game is heavily rooted in violence. You will kill and watch hundreds of people die, and in that process see that war is horrifying. The game actively encourages you to not shoot civilians and often penalized (by a game over screen) if you do. However, the game contains an (optional) mission where you go undercover to infiltrate the enemy. While undercover, you participate in a terrorist attack of an airport and must decide whether to shoot injured civilians or walk on by as the other terrorists kill them.
Positive role models: The player is part of an elite military squad out to protect the world from a harmful (and heavily armed) organization. But the player fights fire with fire and must kill hundreds of people in this game. There is also an opportunity to make moral decisions when it comes to shooting civilians while undercover as a terrorist, so the player can guide this portion of the game.  
Ease of play: The game is fairly easy to pick up, on both the console and PC versions, especially for fans of first-person shooters. The deveolopers have added special perks for non-expert players such as health bursts when they fail repeatedly and providing an (optional) easier way to target. There's also a good tutorial mode.
Violence: As with past Call of Duty games, Modern Warfare 2 depicts military violence in a realistic manner and is played from an immersive first-person perspective. Using machine guns and sniper rifles, gamers must shoot to kill, and blood can be seen on fallen enemies. There is also use of grenades and missiles. The game has scenes of civilian deaths, including a controversial (but optional) airport level in which the player goes undercover as an enemy terrorist. Cries of pain can be heard from victims in this game. Players are also rewarded for "killstreaks," where killing four enemies in a row, results in a bonus supply drop.  
Sex: Not applicable.
Language: The game does contain some profanity, such as the word "s--t," "damn" and "hell." Some Russian words are worse, translating to "motherf--ker" and "f--k," though most American players won't know what this means.
Consumerism: Not applicable.
Drinking, drugs, & smoking: The game makes some references to drugs, plus the multiplayer mode lets you unlock emblems tied to your gamertag, including one that resembles a rolled marijuana cigarette ("joint") and one that shows a cannabis leaf.

More on Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2

What to talk about

Talk to your kids
  • Families can talk about whether these games sensationalize violence, and thus, trivialize the role of U.S. troops who lose their lives in the call of duty. Or do games like this give us a taste of what American soldiers go through to protect the free world?

  • How do you feel about the inclusion of the optional "airport mission" where you, as an undercover agent, take part in a terrorist attack on an airport in which hundreds of civilians are killed.

  • Why is it important to keep violent media away from kids? Is there anything wrong with violence video games if you're of the age to play them? Or is it worse than "enjoying" a violent war film because you're actually doing the killing?

  • Game developer Activision Blizzard is using part of the money they will make on this game to create a one million dollar fund to help raise awareness of veterans' unemployment difficulties. What are some of challenges facing veterans?

What's the story?

What's the story?

CALL OF DUTY: MODERN WARFARE 2, the hotly-anticipated sequel to Activision's Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, which has sold more than 13 million units to date, once again drops you into a fictional near-future world in which a Russian ultranationalist threatens world security. From an intense first-person perspective, this military shooter engages you in both open-environment and close-quartered fighting, with an assortment of modern weapons ranging from machine guns and sniper rifles to grenades and missiles. Along with playing as different characters spread across the 6-to-8-hour single-player campaign, many will take the game online to indulge in a myriad of multiplayer modes (cooperatively or competitively). With the latter, a new "co-op" mode called Spec-Ops is made up of a series of near two-dozen missions; one highlight is the AC-130 mission, in which one gamer mans the gunship and provides bird's eye instructions to the second player who sneaks across the terrain. The competitive games played online supports up to 18 players and includes mainstays such as Deathmatch (everyone out for themselves), Team Deathmatch, Capture the Flag, and others, spread across 16 unique maps.

Is it any good?

Is it any good?
 

Yes, it is a very good game, but it's realistic portrayal of violence means parents need to take heed to the "Mature" rating (for players 17 years and older). The game's intriguing fiction, outstanding production values (including near-photorealistic imagery, an excellent musical score and voice talent), and most importantly, thrilling first-person gameplay, make this sequel one of the most explosive hits of 2009. Tackling enemies in huge and fully interactive environments -- ranging from the dusty towns of Afghanistan to the snow-capped mountains of Kazakhstan to the gritty streets of Rio de Janeiro to Washington, D.C. under attack -- also help this game feel like a cinematic action movie in which you're in the starring role. As with its predeessor, taking the game online gives it some serious legs and will sure to entertain for years to come. In short, if you liked 2007's Modern Warfare, you'll love Modern Warfare 2.

Online interaction: As with its predecessors, much of the appeal of these games is the online play with other gamers. Some might argue shooting other "humans," played by real players, is unhealthy while others might argue it's a harmless way to blow off steam after a bad day. Also keep in mind, many people also play with headsets and you can her some pretty intense language in these Call of Duty games.

Game themes & details

Game Details
Available on: Xbox 360, PlayStation 3, Windows
Available online
Genre: First Person Shooter
Developer: Activision
Released on: November 10, 2009
Price: 59.99
ESRB Rating: M for Blood, Drug Reference, Intense Violence, Language
Screenshots

This review was written by Marc Saltzman
 
 

Review It

 

Review Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2





Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.
 

What parents & educators say

12
Based on 174 parent & educator reviews:
  • 45% say violence is an issue
  • 42% say language is an issue
  • 32% say there are positive role models
  • 26% say there are positive messages
  • 25% say it's educational

Most useful reviews by all members

blueduck86
parent of 14 year old
 
Great Shooter for kids 12+
I think that kids and teens shouldn't play most M games, but some are acceptable. When people rate games, I think they overrate them. about half the games that are M are the equivalent of a pg 13 movie, such as halo 3, odst. Non realistic blood and pg 13 language isnt so bad as to be treated like a rated R movie, it would be a pg 13 movie. Half the things kids watch are worse than M games, and have much more language. As long as your kid isnt running around your street pretending like hes killing your neighbors with an airsoft gun, then i would trust him/her to play an M game. It's all a matter of whether you trust your kid not to curse or kill people. (honestly, do you think your kids gonna wake up in the morning going, "mommy! I just played mw2 and it inspired me to kill people! bye!") The game does have a mature content filter, so that cuts out most of the language and blood. Just go to the options menu and you will see the option for the filter. As most people probably know about from news stories or hearing people talk about it, there is a controversial level in the game where you go undercover as a Russian terrorist and go into an airport where you massacre innocent civilians. The game gives players several options 1. Skip the level entirely. 2. Go through the level but don't kill anyone, or 3. Kill everyone you see. I had my 12 year old son skip the level entirely. There is no penalty for skipping the level. There is some pretty bad language, but kids hear stuff a lot worse than s--t or f--k (which they say pretty rarely) at school that us parents might not have even heard before. I was picking my son up and there were some 12 year old kids who were fighting and talking like sailors. I asked my son about it (he wasn't involved) and he said he hears kids say stuff like that all the time at school. I actually think the filter is unnecessary until the last level of the game where your character is stabbed and all you see is a big red mess around you. So this game is okay for kids 12+ if you skip the level "No Russian" and use the filter.

Jparker
educator and parent of 15 and 15 year old
 
Maturity and education are key
Call of Duty. My son's favorite game and on of my favorites to. Most parents today take one look at a rating and then make there choice. They do not take the time to read reviews by other parents who have allowed their kids to play the games or watch the movies. This is a problem. COD MOD2 as my son calls it it a war game and it is violent. what you need to remember is that you are taking the part of the GOOD GUYS (The US Army) and fight to protect freedom in other places. The only reason for such a high rating is because of some mild language (One count of the F word) and because of the realistic violence. I like to use games, movies etc. as learning experiences for my kids, With this game I talked to my son (14 years old) about how true to life this game actually is. The gameplay reminds me of the war stories my father told me when I was younger. I think that one could call this game educational because it is so lifelike in the scenarios and in the the tactics used to take dow the opposing forces. The game has good role models in the sense that you are playing the part of the good guys and that you are fighting to make the world safe for all. I tell my kids that fighting is never the answer but sometimes when you cant use your words to change bad people or people who are hurting others,you need to resort to force to keep people safe. I have two kids, one age 12 and the other age 14. I think that this game is to intense for my 12 year old to play. I hope this review helps you with your choices. Dr. J. Parker

 
Without the one terrorist scene, much lighter game than Black Ops.
Just like I said before with Black Ops, just because a game is rated M doesn't necessarily mean it automatically should be ruled out for all age groups. I'd definitely let most 14-16 year olds play this game, no problem. It is a good game, the storyline's a bit lacking compared to other Call of Duty games, but, well, great game mechanics make it kind of worth it. There is that one scene everyone talks about, the part of the game that almost got the game banned in some countries, called "No Russian". This is exactly what that level is; you, an undercover agent for the United States, are ordered to stay close to a Russian terrorist in order to gather intel and eventually kill him/lock him up. You are ordered by your supieriors to do whatever it takes, whatever he tells you to do, because it is the only way you will be able to get close to this guy. The Russian terrorist leader orders you and several other of his men to go through a Russian airport, shooting every civilian in sight. This is the first time in Call of Duty games where the character is ASKED to kill civilians. However, you don't even have to shoot. You can just follow everyone and not shoot a single shot. I realize that this is a very obviously violent scene. However, this game as a whole is not as intense and dark as Black Ops. And parents should remember NOTE**** that you can set the game's options to a non-graphic setting that will make it so that there aren't any blood effects when you shoot people, and you are asked at the beginning of this game whether you want to play it or whether you'd like to skip this scene. Without this scene...this game is an entertaining FPS that has great controls, not the best story but good levels, good voice acting, great graphics, (there is language, it is true, and thats just a matter of know your kid and how old they are). Overall....nothing in this game even comes close to the intense darkness of Black Ops, in which you are strapped to a torture chair, and there is a level in which you are locked by your own men into a gas chamber and have to watch the men dying very graphically around you, vomiting blood, eyes bleeding, skin corroding etc etc. Nothing like that in this game. Its pretty much Bang, Blood, enemy dead, swear swear, thats it. If your kid watches that on TV or in the movies anyway...why not?

 
Great game
If your not an aggressive parent like the ones who won't even let there kids watch Bambi, then this game is ok for your kids. There may be one level that promotes terrorism, but it gives you the option to skip it and move on. Its not that bad of a game language is about the only issue, just mute the TV. Don't worry about blood in in anything, blood is a natural part of life so parents who think that blood is something bad;WRONG; its natural so get used to it. Its rated M for blood and the terrorist mission but like i said (or typed) those are issues that can easily be taken care of. Enjoy your soon to be favorite game.

johansons@wind ...
parent of 13 and 14 year old
 
I have found it amusing and concerning to read other reviews regarding this game. In many cases, it's obvious which reviews were written by kids and which by parents. I can appreciate the excitement and entertainment value expressed by kids. I marvel at the technical, artistic, and literary level today's video games have achieved. I have always been impressed by how creative, intelligent, and eloquent so many game developers are. I actually enjoy watching the "cut scenes" from some of my sons' games, and - by observing their game play- I can see how much goes into a game's developement. As a parent, I also relate to other parents concerns regarding the gore, violence, and language. Most parents would probably find this game suitable for only those children 15 or 16 and older. I, however, have a 12 and 13 year old who have been playing M-games like this one for 3 years. As a parent, the most important issue for me is not whether there is or isn't violence, vulgarity, gore, nudity and the like, BUT whether your child can process the content correctly. I always draw the line at games that glorify and/or encourage devient behavior, abuse, or violence for pleasure or amusement. I can remember watching war footage on the evening news and very gory films in Drivers Ed - I don't want to sugar-coat the world to my childern. The goal is to allow them access to as much information, without desensitizing them to negative aspects. I watch the game WHILE my children play it, and I will start a conversation when I see something that bothers or concerns me. I want to make sure they know this is a simulation- that war is horrible and people can suffer horribly as a result. I also watch the portions that give the player a moral option. I will ask why they chose as they did. C.O.D has not only strived for visual and situational realism- although nothing can fully demonstrate the horror and dispair- it also offers up issues of morality. While I would have liked the "Gore" and "Language" options that are available in G.O.W., they do give you an option to forego the controversial sections of the game. As always, parents must be aware of the risks of online game play - there are no filters or sensors for the on-line gaming community (but those risks are present with even E-rated games). While some parents may not agree with my choice to allow my 12 and 13 year old to play M-rated games, I am confident , that by observing the game and having discussions about the questionable content, my children are able to enjoy the game for what it is: a game that peeks at a specific topic We must respect the talent of the creators of C.O.D 2 and applaud the social responsability they have shown by creating the vetren's fund (let's face it, they could have just pocketed that money as more profit). I'm afraid there are no easy answers in this day and age of technology, but by knowing and understanding your children, and framing the context of this game to those who allow acess to their kids, this game isn't that bad.

DarkArcher64
teen, 16 years old
 
Extremely Intense Shooter
Alot of pointless killing, blood and gore. No Russian is a mission where you enter an airport and take out hundreds (maybe thousands) of innocent people. Blood is sprayed every where an is extremely gruesome and disdurping. The game is definitely not for kids 15 and under. 16 at the very least if they can handle alot of violence and blood. Another level allows you to drive a truck as you run over people, if you hit someone there brains and skull crack open and splatter all over your windshield. No kids, unless there daring and can take alot of intense content

 
Okay for kids 11+, but skip "No Russia"
I got this game for myself to play a few months ago, but then my son started playing it and I told him I don't mind if he plays as long as he doesn't do the mission "No Russia" where you go around massacring innocent civilians at a Russian airport, but fortunately, the level can be skipped. I find the ESRB ratings to be a bit overboard, but I guess they have to since there are some immature kids who would see a guy get shot in a video game and then go decide to shoot someone them self. If I were you, I would allow your child to play this game, sit down with him/her for a while while they play it and see how they react to it. Also, notice how they act when not playing the game for a few days, if they get aggressive or other bad behavior more than usual, because it is normal for this behavior to occur with kids at this age, but if it gets to be too much, put the game away for a few months, then they will probably be mature enough to play the game. Thank you for reading, Dr. Jonathan Walden

12345678910111 ...
parent of 14 year old
 
Perfect game for kids 12 and older
Amazing military shooter, ok for kids 12+. This game is spectacular. It's fine for kids 12 and older because kids aren't stupid, they understand what's ok in real life versus what's ok in a video game. The game is realistic, and as a father of a Private 1st Class in the US Army, I think that it's important for everyone to know what the soldiers go through to protect us. It's not significantly more violent than Call of Duty 3 (which is rated T.) As pretty much the whole world has heard about, there's an OPTIONAL mission called "No Russian", where you go undercover as a terrorist and work with a Russian terrorist group to kill civilians in a Russian airport. I let my 12 year old son play the game, but I made him skip the "No Russian" level. The blood in the game isn't really that bad. Just a puff of blood when enemies are shot. When you are shot, the edges of your screen becomes bloody, but it doesn't even look like real blood, it's clear and watery. As long as your child is mature and at least 12 years old, this game should be fine for them. If you buy the game used at Gamestop, you can return the game in under a week if you think it's not appropriate for them.

openmindeddad
parent of 15 year old
 
no one under thirteen
my son wanted this game soo bad and he just turned 14 but his 12 year old brother wanted to play it to i would say no to his younger brother but yes to him i also think a thirteen your old kid can handle it because all the kids at his school got it so i think he is focusing on fitting in and having fun rather then enjoying killing and language so i would let your kid get it if theyy are more excited about playing with there friends then killing people

MakarovSucks
teen, 14 years old
 
Great But Really violent.
This Game is great! but its got it faults. i marked Ease to play because the controls are perfect on any system (Not counting PC & MAC) I marked Ba roll models because on the 3rd mission there is a Controversial !TERRORIST! mission and you have the ease of shooting countless Inoccent Bystanders. but also in the terrorist mission You are not a terrorist. your trying to fool the 2cnd antagonist "Vladimir Makarov" but the stupid thing is i was really looking forward to killing him at the end of that mission. But he knew that u werent a terrorist all along. so ge kills u with a gun to the head. Anyway the multiplayer is rewarding and phenominal. It never gets old because there is something called prestige mode and you can start over with all your emblems and callsigns but not ur guns. This game is great. I give it 5 stars and for 11+

JoeyBroey177
parent of 12 year old
 
Perfect for a 12 year old or a mature 11 year old
I am a therapist that works with adults and kids. I agree this game is violent, BUT, it's nothing too violent. My mature 11 year old kid had me take a look at it. It was nothing too bad. So I then rented it at block buster to take a look and beat the game. It was'nt bad until I go to the level "No Russian" when my character went into an airport and killed people. I did'nt like that so I decided to not get the game. I eventually found out you can skip that level. So I told my son the only way I would get him the game is if he skipped that level. He agreed and then bought it with his own money. Joe Smith.

 
Mature Tweens and Up
First of all, most parents think that you have to follow the ESRB. If your child is begging you for this, you just have to explain that killing is not right, and you shouldn't go and do this stuff. Another concern is that it desensitizes kids to violence. My child, after playing the airport scene, came up to me and said that people in the army must hate killing people because it causes so much pain. So basically, you just have to explain to your child that killing is really bad.

Thejudgeofallten
parent of 13 , 15 , and 16 year old
 
There are some ups and downs all over this game, but good for twelve and up.
This game in some places seems like it should almost be rated teen, or e10. With the amazing filters that they have you can almost comepletely eliminate the blood, and the profanity. With that gone the game is now rated teen. This game portrays role models of American C.I.A agents and British S.A.S. operatives. All these people are fighting for thier country, and slowly along the course of the game you start to realize how horrific war is, sending a strong antiwar message. Parts of this game are sad and moving, with the entire game being incredibly in depth as far as world powers like Russia and Euope go. In parts it requires you to have good problem solving skills and an understanding of government. Gone is the time where you just go to play a game to kill, now you actually have to think about what exactaly you're going to do. As far as profanity and violence goes there is some, but only with the innapropriate material filter off, and it's easy to go under the options menu and adjust that. Overall this game it good for teens who can understand government and strategy.

 
If anyone wants to know about the "Disturbing Content" scene (NO, its NOT meant to be a MURDER SIMULATION! Read!)
I have played through it myself...and it almost made me cry...this is coming from a 17 year old who's played violent, gory games since I was 5 years old, but the game was amazing nonetheless. However, here's the lowdown on the particular scene, if you choose to participate in the "Disturbing Content" mission. It is a shooting taking place in a Russian airport, where you take part as a CIA agent disguised as a terrorist and see the horror through his eyes. What I think the mission is trying to show the players is the horrors and reality of terrorism...seriously...it IS disturbing, but it really wakes you up to just what people had to live through in terrorist attacks and shootings, it puts you right there in the scene....its almost unbelievable to realize just what it would be like to there...its just horrendous, but a true turning point for amazing story-telling through games. If you are disturbed by shootings, or maybe had a loved one who died in a shooting, I would recommend skipping the mission, it really will make an impact on you (but in a positive way, it opens you to the fact that war IS hell, and not as fun as the video games make it out to be). Really, I actually think its an important scene to wake those up who mindlessly play these games and see just what can happen in a situation like this. It really made me think about those who were victims of attacks like this...and it still makes me feel sad just to think something like that happens almost every few days. Unfortunately, ignorant and one-sided parents and adults are just going to claim it's a mindless "murder simulation" on places like the Fox "News" channel (probably one of the worst news channels in history). Sigh...if parents could only see that these games are more than just games now...they have turned into stories, epic tales of drama that you might find in a book...now on the screen. Otherwise, the story and gameplay is completely amazing, and although the multiplayer isn't very balanced, it it still very fun. If you skip the mission (and the game ALWAYS gives you the option to skip it) I would recommend the game for anyone +13 and older, and +15 for the addition of the Airport shooting scene.

Joe10
teen, 16 years old
 
A great game!
Common sense exagerates too much. This game is not very gory except when you get shot up, but its nothing much. This is a great game. Part of the reason it is rated M is because the online. Once again a great game for 13+ or maybe 12+.

 
Great for mature 12 or 13 yearolds and up
As with all call of duty games, this in a first person shooter and is very violent. The game is very realistic but you are in the boots of a soldier, not a gangster in like GTA. It shows good role models and the lives of the men protecting our country. Also, it is not even close to as gorey or bloody as call of duty 5, and if the violence still bothers you there is a filter that shuts off blood, gore, and profanity. Online play is great, not too bloody, and has no profanity. The new spec ops game mode is my favorite, but has some profanity scattered throughout the missions, but theres no f words. The campaign is really intense and it tells a great story. While it does teach good antiwar lessons, it is bloody, some missions are violent and chaotic and has some profanity. In the campaign the only f word is said in russian there is not much other bad content. Now for the mission "NO RUSSIAN". This is an OPTIONAL campaign mission that sets the scene of the war for the rest of the game. You do not have to play this mission and if you do, you are not required to shoot civilians. This mission seems bad, especially when you help russian terrorists kill innocent people, but it is in an attempt to infiltrate the terrorist cell and save many more lives than were lost.

triple threat
parent of 8 and 16 year old
 
Great missions and campaign but very intense and violent.
I really like this game. I am a father of 3 16 year olds and they do most of the playing but I even find myself sneaking down to play this after they have gone to bed (only time I can snag a controller). I am sure this is in the other reviews but it is very violent, not like Halo violence but much more intense and graphic. There is a mission where you go into an airport undercover with some baddies and are supposed to watch as they kill innocent people (I couldn't handle it so I terminated the bad guys but it ends the mission as you job is to stay undercover). They have a patch in place (if you are connected to the internet) to let you skip that mission and not affect your game which I appreciate and used and instruct my boys to use. I am really surprised when they created the game they didn't see that it was way too much. Another example of the intensity is when you are dying the there is blood in your vision and your breathing and heartbeat become very loud and haggard. It is intense. I won't let my 7 year old daughter in the room while they are playing.

DOCCON
teen, 18 years old
 
If you've read my earlier COD reviews, you'd notice I'm a big fan of the series, especially when the game features the word "Modern" in it. Things haven't changed here. After being excited for a sequel for 2 years and REALLY wanting one for 9 months prior to release, November 10 was exciting to say the least. I was afraid the game was going to fail to live up the the high expectations I set up for it, but it passed in every way. Multiplayer hasn't been greatly changed, but its been fine tuned with many great, new editions. As before, you start out with only a couple of guns and perks (which are bonuses like reloading faster or doing slightly greater bullet damage), but as you earn kills and complete challenges (fall 15 feet and survive or kill an enemy, take his gun, and kill him again with his own gun), you earn EXP and level up. Leveling up gives you new perks and guns and game types to choose from. The create a class feature from the first game carriers over, allowing you to craft your perfect warrior using what you have unlocked. If you like sniping, you can choose your favorite rifle of the bunch and then perks that would compliment it. However, there have been some additions. Before, you got 3, 5, and 7 kill streaks for getting said number of kills in a row. Now you get to choose between 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,11,15, and 25 killstreaks (most of which also need to be unlocked by leveling up, this time in the order of your choosing). This opens up a nice risk/reward system, since earlier kill streaks tend to not be as good as the higher ones (a 25 kill streak calls in a nuke that ends the game and gives your team an automatic win). It may take more work to get an 11 kill streak, but calling in an AC-130 gunship to rain down fire from the sky is much more entertaining, thrilling, an enjoyable than calling in a UAV radar with 3 kills. There are also new attachments to put on guns, such as heartbeat sensors and holographic scopes (which again, are unlocked through getting kills with a specific gun, thus unlocking attachments for only that weapon). Another new feature is upgrading perks. Extra bullet damage against humans is nice, but you can now upgrade the perk that enables that to get extra bullet damage against aircraft and other killstreaks. There are other changes as well, but I think I've said enough. The multiplayer itself can't be beat by any game on the market. It has dozens upon dozens of hours of entertainment packed away and could be sold as a full game all by itself. Most maps are very well constructed. For every sniping spot, there is another place where you can counter the sniper. There are plenty of maps to play on and at least 80% of them are great, probably more. The multiplayer could be sold as a full game all by itself, yet it is only one of three modes you have to play. Spec-Ops is the new mode. It allows you and a friend to play through one of 23 challenges cooperatively. Missions could involve races on snowmobiles, to sniping stealth missions, to areas with a finite number of enemies that you can take down as you see fit. 21 of these challenges can be played solo, but things get fun when a friend hops in. There is no matchmaking for spec-ops, but it allows you to play with people on your friends list or split-screen. It would have been nice to have matchmaking, but odds are, you are going to have friends with the game, so there will be many opportunities to play with others. Overall, I found myself playing it the least and I think it is the worst of the three modes, yet it is still highly fun and some games would be lucky to have that mode as their best mode. Now for the story. As has been highly advertised, there is a skipable mission where you play an undercover CIA agent posing as a terrorist. I don't know how it got so controversial, as there are many films with much more gruesome takes on terrorism than this. I thought the scene didn't take it far enough to show off the true horrors of terrorism, but took it plenty far enough to be found as disturbing. I wasn't offended by it, but others may be. The single player mode is expertly paced, extremely intense, and most importantly, extremely fun. Unfortunately, it is a bit on the short side and ends in a HIGHLY uneventful cliffhanger, making the game feel shorter still, but the six to eight hours it'll take to finish are still highly memorable. Nothing comes off quite as big as a COD4 nuke, but many things come very close. Along with the short length, the story has one more problem: it is nigh impossible to piece together what the heck is going on. After analyzing it for awhile after beating it, you figure out that some corrupt American soldier decides he really wants to be a war hero, so he finds a crazy terrorist and secretly teams up with the terrorist while said terrorist (Makarov) blows the crap out of the American east coast. He destroys much of DC, along with many other locations. There are plenty of holes along the way, but to reveal them is to spoil a lot of the (nonsensical) story, so I'll leave them alone. If you want to find most of them, Gamesradar* had a Modern Warfare 2 article that did an amazing job at revealing some of the lapses of logic that go on during the story. MW2 is lucky that story doesn't mean a whole lot when it comes to shooting terrorists and it is also very fortunate that you never pick up on most of the holes when playing the game. You move from one set piece moment to another so fast, that you never have time to think about what's going on in the story and you never have time to consider what amazing piece of action the developers are going to throw at you next. It acts a bit like a Michael Bay movie, plenty of explosions and shooting, but not a lot of plot. Considering how amazing everything else is, though, you may find it hard to care a whole lot about the story's shortcomings. If I have to choose between insane fun or an amazing story (especially for a first person shooter), I'll take the fun 10 times out of 10 and that is exactly what MW2 gives you.

11BK201
adult
 
Amazing FPS and multi-player!
Being used to playing Gears of War 1 and 2, this is a very mild M. There is some language (sh*t, b*tch, other milder words and one use of f*ck) and there is some blood in the violence but it is definitely not as bad as most M games I've played. The biggest thing about this game is the intensity. I've played intense games before but nothing had my heart pumping like Modern Warfare 2. The violence almost feels like watching a mild war film. It feels more real than other first person shooters I've played. There are also several scenarios where you are either fighting in a neighborhood or the war-torn streets of Washington D.C. that are extremely intense. This game is totally fine for experienced or older gamers but could be overwhelming for younger, more sensitive players. There are also two missions/scenes that have a warning before they start. It says that the following mission could be offensive or upsetting to some people and it gives you the option to skip. This does not affect leveling up or completing the game. Since I have only played the game once I have not yet played these levels and cannot comment on them. In the end, this is an incredible game with great single and multiplayer. There are also plenty of good side missions to work on your skills. This is a great game for teens and older.

Gamer 4 Life
parent of 11 year old
 
I'm 17 years old who enjoy the game, and mostly online matches. It really not for kids, they able to pick up new language from other players, and I notice most kids who I over hear, because they can't turn off their mic, can't stop playing this, as I hear parents telling them to stop, and they refusing to stop playing. It a good game for those who understand what right and wrong, but for others uhh I have to leave it and you decide if it best for them. Also hate kids when their in my team, as they lack in teamwork, causing our team to lose. That one of the reason I post this, and Register because I want to say something about this.

An independent voice for families
Age-appropriate reviews
 

vote now

Will you play Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2?


Already played it? What do you think?

 

Great alternatives handpicked by our editors


About our rating system
ON: Content is appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child, some content may not be right for some kids
OFF: Not age appropriate for kids this age