It would be interesting to hear what standard of comparision was used by the main reviewer to recommend this game. A big weakness of this site is that, although it is good for filtering things due to objectional content, it seems to be very lenient in holding up things to quality of implementation. Searching the web, I am not alone in having concluded that although the premise is cute, the implementation of this title is very poorly executed. Given that this is the consensus of nearly all the rest of the world, perhaps the main review should ahve addressed it head on if she felt differently, rather than just ignoring it.