Apocalypto (R)

The bloody end of a civilization. Not for kids.

(Flash is loading. If this text does not disappear you need to install the latest flash version)

Common Sense rates it
2
Seen the movie? Review it
5915_orig.jpg
Movie details
  • Studio: Touchstone Pictures, Touchstone Pictures
  • Directed By: Mel Gibson
  • Cast: Rudy Youngblood, Dalia Hernandez, Raoul Trujillo
  • Running Time: 148 minutes
  • Release Date: 12/07/2006
  • Video/DVD Release Date: 05/22/2007
  • Genre: Action/adventure
  • MPAA Rating: R
  • MPAA Explanation: sequences of graphic violence and disturbing images.

Parents need to know

Parents need to know that this relentlessly brutal, subtitled action film isn't for kids. It features extreme and repetitive violence, including suggestions of rape (screaming women who are dragged off screen). But the greatest viciousness is directed against male bodies: Men are tortured, beaten, cut, kicked, thrown to the ground, speared, shot with arrows, beheaded, and cut open while they're still alive (their cut-out hearts appear in close-up). A man's throat is cut in front of his son, heads are set on sticks as totems, and a jaguar attacks a man and rips him to pieces on screen. A pregnant woman and her young child are left stranded in a dangerous situation, leading to some very tense moments; other children are left to fend for themselves when their parents are taken captive, and a young girl with smallpox (her face marked with open sores) is shown crying next to her mother's corpse. A man's alleged impotence is the source of some humor. One subtitled use of "f--k."

Families can talk about the role of violence in the movie. Is it appropriate for the story that's being told? Which parts, if any, are gratuitous? How accurate do you think it is? Director Mel Gibson has become known for making very violent movies -- why do you think a filmmaker might be drawn to that kind of material? How about the subtitles? Why do you think Gibson chose to film the movie in Yucatec? Families can also talk about the relationships between the different groups of Mayans in the movie. Why does one group think the other is suitable for labor and sacrifice? How does the film represent Mayan religious rituals? How does Jaguar Paw's devotion to his family make him a familiar and also mythic hero?

Message

Social Behavior:

The noble hero must answer brutal, relentless villains with his own form of brutality.

Consumerism:

Drugs/Alcohol/Tobacco:

Violence

Gory violence is explicit and almost non-stop, in some form or another. An early hunting scene sets the tone when a tapir is abruptly killed and cut open. Bloody assaults (rape is implied in some cases); weapons include spears, knives, arrows, poison darts, spiked traps, and other tools. Men are chased, hit, kicked, knifed, beaten, speared, cut open (their hearts are cut out and held up in ritual sacrifice while they're still alive), and beheaded (this is also graphic, with heads and bodies falling down a long staircase with loud thuds). Frequent shots of injured, bloody bodies and faces (including one particularly gruesome scene in which an exposed brain spurts blood). A man's throat is cut in front of his horrified son, and a jaguar rips a man to pieces before being brutally stabbed to death. Frequent deadly peril.

Sex

Naked or near-naked bodies throughout (16th-century tribal communities); jokey references to one man's impotence (he's given tapir "balls" to eat and a salve that makes his genitals burn, and his wife appears with her mouth also "burning," indicating off-screen fellatio).

Language

In subtitles: One "f--ked," plus "damn."

Common Sense says

What's the story?

Reviewed by Cynthia Fuchs

Young, optimistic 15th-century Mayan tribesman Jaguar Paw (Rudy Youngblood) confronts real fear for the first time after he and his hunting party come across a band of terrified, homeless villagers seeking "a new beginning." Jaguar Paw soon has his own reason to be afraid, when a band of fierce Holcane warriors attack his village: They pillage, burn, rape, and murder, taking the able-bodied young adults away to their festering city, where they sell the women as servants and plan to sacrifice the men atop a pyramid overlooking the town square. Unexpectedly escaping this terrible fate, Jaguar Paw spends the rest of the movie trying to save his pregnant wife, Seven (Dalia Hernandez), and young son, whom he hid from the marauders in an empty well. Pursued by vengeful Holcane leader Zero Wolf (Raoul Trujillo) and his second, Snake Ink (Rodolfo Palacios), along with a crew of fleet runners and ferocious killers, Jaguar Paw has his work -- survival -- cut out for him.

Is it any good?

2
Another adventure in spectacular physical abuse directed by Mel Gibson, Apocalypto combines gorgeous imagery and stunning brutality. Even as bodies are falling and crashing, bleeding and drowning, Dean Semler's cinematography is breathtaking and the compositions ravishing, whether they're lush forest backgrounds or fascinating faces in close-up.

Jaguar Paw's story is an occasion for imagining what happened to the Mayan civilization. Assuming the Spanish "explorers" didn't destroy the Mayans in one fell swoop, Apocalypto offers up an assortment of explanations, both material and spiritual, for their downfall. The start of the collective fall, the film suggests, comes with assaults on individuals. While it's clear that the hero not only endures, but also exacts vengeance when he must, the film doesn't ever get around to considering consequences for all the mayhem.

Related Video

Other choices

The New World

Braveheart
The Passion of the Christ
The Fountain

Parents and kids say

All Reviews

There are 22 reviews.

3

Posted on 05/19/08 by Anonymous Kid contributor, age 12

good but gory

i like the movie but besides the gore it is a good movie i like how jaguar paw fights to rescue his family but the gore eww a guy gets impaled on the head by an arrow
4


Posted on 11/25/07 by greta-elisif Adult contributor

Graphically Violent

I think this may be the most violent non-horror movie ever. My father-in-law got it for the older kids, who are 13, 12, and 10. He didn’t think it would be very bad. I was fairly disturbed by the idea of children watching it. Kids should definitely not watch this movie.
4


Posted on 11/20/07 by Casper Kid contributor, age 15

This is an okay movie

The violence could give little kids nightmares. It's not an extremely great movie, but still recommendable. Children under the age of 12 shouldn't watch it, as it has powerful, graphic images (not as much as The Passion of Christ). It does have some sexual references, so that's something that shouldn't be overlooked.
5


Posted on 11/02/07 by trojan51 Adult contributor
3


Posted on 10/23/07 by willbarchi Kid contributor, age 15

This is... wow

No matter how you look at it, apocalypto is an extremly violent film. Most of it is completly unnecessary however, and it really spoiled what could have been an EXCELLENT movie. The plot is pretty basic, as is the acting, but some of the sets and extras really take your breath away. Now, i'm no expert on mayan history and culture, but i'm pretty sure that they didn't glorify horrific acts of violence as much as they do in Apocolypto. This is ABSOLUTELY NOT age-appropriate stuff. Adults only, or mature teens who can handle some of the really stomach churning scenes.
4


Posted on 10/20/07 by Decalis Kid contributor, age 13

Not particularly family-friendly.

Don't get me wrong. This was an amazing movie, and I loved it a lot. However, it is not family material. There are sacrifices, beheadings, deaths galore. It is very violent, and I sometimes think it may not have been best for *me* to see it. There is some nudity, although it's mostly not in any sexual context. There are a number of not so subtle sex jokes. It is, however, a great movie.
4

Posted on 08/23/07 by Anonymous Adult contributor

Stunning!

I really liked this movie! It was very entertaining and had great imagery and also had it's humor. It isn't really recommended for kids. But I loved it. The only thing I didn't love was that I was left hanging about a few issues in the movie.
5


Posted on 08/02/07 by moviegeek Kid contributor, age 15
1


Posted on 06/26/07 by TexasOma Adult contributor

I'm worried about Mel

I'm grateful that I saw this at home rather than on big screen. While I can admire the cinematography, the costumes, the use of native language, and even the thin plot line revolving around love of family, all that was overwhelmed by the gratuitous violence. There were elements of the story that were ludicrous - the pursuers left a killing arena armed only with a few weapons, but when chasing the captive through the rainforest they all had torches (and means to light them). The pursued man was badly wounded but didn't even slow down. And in the fast and furious pursuit through the immense forest, the pursuers knew exactly which way the prisoner ran. But overall it was the violence that left me cold, and made me feel that Mel Gibson's ultimate intent was to see how gruesome and gross he could be. It's unfortunate that he hasn't grasped the concept of suggestion - that it is possible to convey a point powerfully without making the viewer feel that he's stepped into a bloodbath.
0


Posted on 06/16/07 by jcsoblonde Kid contributor, age 16

UGH!!!!!!!

this film is so dirty and disgusting it doesnt deserve a rating. i couldnt even finish it. if anything common sense media was too lax on it i found it the most repulsive thing ive had to watch. waste of money.

See all 22 reviews >

Adult Reviews

There are 11 reviews.

4


Posted on 11/25/07 by greta-elisif Adult contributor

Graphically Violent

I think this may be the most violent non-horror movie ever. My father-in-law got it for the older kids, who are 13, 12, and 10. He didn’t think it would be very bad. I was fairly disturbed by the idea of children watching it. Kids should definitely not watch this movie.
5


Posted on 11/02/07 by trojan51 Adult contributor
4

Posted on 08/23/07 by Anonymous Adult contributor

Stunning!

I really liked this movie! It was very entertaining and had great imagery and also had it's humor. It isn't really recommended for kids. But I loved it. The only thing I didn't love was that I was left hanging about a few issues in the movie.
1


Posted on 06/26/07 by TexasOma Adult contributor

I'm worried about Mel

I'm grateful that I saw this at home rather than on big screen. While I can admire the cinematography, the costumes, the use of native language, and even the thin plot line revolving around love of family, all that was overwhelmed by the gratuitous violence. There were elements of the story that were ludicrous - the pursuers left a killing arena armed only with a few weapons, but when chasing the captive through the rainforest they all had torches (and means to light them). The pursued man was badly wounded but didn't even slow down. And in the fast and furious pursuit through the immense forest, the pursuers knew exactly which way the prisoner ran. But overall it was the violence that left me cold, and made me feel that Mel Gibson's ultimate intent was to see how gruesome and gross he could be. It's unfortunate that he hasn't grasped the concept of suggestion - that it is possible to convey a point powerfully without making the viewer feel that he's stepped into a bloodbath.
4


Posted on 06/08/07 by cortright5 Adult contributor

Realistic Historical Film

If you have a stomach for graphic violence lots of gore. Patience to read subtitles due to the film being spoken in their native tongue (very impressive) this is a film for you. This is not suitable for any child under the age of 15. The film is rich with culture, the cinematography is just perfect. I really felt that I was taken back to another place and time. Excellent film making.
4


Posted on 06/03/07 by Kilfornyea Adult contributor
4


Posted on 03/05/07 by marse Adult contributor

ACTION PACKED !!!

the chase part is what u would enjoy the most especially when he finally decided to fight his captors. brutally violent but overall i think its a great movie, there's this desire to come back for his family so he better keep himself alive
5


Posted on 02/25/07 by angiezuniga77 Adult contributor

Great movie, very violent but AWESOME

I was left with my jaw dropped, I loved the whole movie and was on the edge of my seat biting my nails. Yes it is violent, yes it is gory, no don't take the kids..but there is a love story and a will to live within the movie that captures the audience. Rudy Youngblood is an awesome artist and actor...thank you Mel Gibson!!
3


Posted on 01/12/07 by Dhorlo Adult contributor
2


Posted on 12/11/06 by abrotman Adult contributor
See all 11 adult reviews>

Kids Reviews

There are 11 reviews.

3

Posted on 05/19/08 by Anonymous Kid contributor, age 12

good but gory

i like the movie but besides the gore it is a good movie i like how jaguar paw fights to rescue his family but the gore eww a guy gets impaled on the head by an arrow
4


Posted on 11/20/07 by Casper Kid contributor, age 15

This is an okay movie

The violence could give little kids nightmares. It's not an extremely great movie, but still recommendable. Children under the age of 12 shouldn't watch it, as it has powerful, graphic images (not as much as The Passion of Christ). It does have some sexual references, so that's something that shouldn't be overlooked.
3


Posted on 10/23/07 by willbarchi Kid contributor, age 15

This is... wow

No matter how you look at it, apocalypto is an extremly violent film. Most of it is completly unnecessary however, and it really spoiled what could have been an EXCELLENT movie. The plot is pretty basic, as is the acting, but some of the sets and extras really take your breath away. Now, i'm no expert on mayan history and culture, but i'm pretty sure that they didn't glorify horrific acts of violence as much as they do in Apocolypto. This is ABSOLUTELY NOT age-appropriate stuff. Adults only, or mature teens who can handle some of the really stomach churning scenes.
4


Posted on 10/20/07 by Decalis Kid contributor, age 13

Not particularly family-friendly.

Don't get me wrong. This was an amazing movie, and I loved it a lot. However, it is not family material. There are sacrifices, beheadings, deaths galore. It is very violent, and I sometimes think it may not have been best for *me* to see it. There is some nudity, although it's mostly not in any sexual context. There are a number of not so subtle sex jokes. It is, however, a great movie.
5


Posted on 08/02/07 by moviegeek Kid contributor, age 15
0


Posted on 06/16/07 by jcsoblonde Kid contributor, age 16

UGH!!!!!!!

this film is so dirty and disgusting it doesnt deserve a rating. i couldnt even finish it. if anything common sense media was too lax on it i found it the most repulsive thing ive had to watch. waste of money.
5


Posted on 05/25/07 by OMGITSERIC Kid contributor, age 14

it teaches.

who needs to sit and read a history book to see how the mayans lived, buy it and see history for yourself, its so good
5


Posted on 05/25/07 by leardi Kid contributor, age 15
5


Posted on 01/13/07 by sbill12 Kid contributor, age 15
2


Posted on 01/02/07 by bubbo Kid contributor, age 14

Mel Gibson, no matter what you may think of his personal life, is a very good filmmaker. Passion of the Christ and Braveheart were excellent, very violent films. His latest, Apocalypto, is a disappointment. This movie is full of nonstop, mindnumbing, and over-the-top violence. Eventually it gets so over-the-top and gruesome you feel the urge to laugh! The violence ruins the movie, and makes it almost impossible to enjoy.
See all 11 kids reviews >
Review It

Great Fantasy Books for Harry Potter Fans

Great Fantasy Books for Harry Potter Fans
Which fantasy book creature has the best name?
Fluffy (3-headed dog, Harry Potter)
20%
Mister Grin (giant crocodile, Peter and the Starcatchers)
40%
Vermicious Knid (shapeshifting monster, Charlie and the Great Glass Elevator)
0%
The Incredibly Deadly Viper (harmless snake, Series of Unfortunate Events)
0%
Bunnicula (vampire bunny, Bunnicula series)
40%
5 votes