Dickie Roberts: Former Child Star (PG-13)

Not at all funny David Spade movie.

(Flash is loading. If this text does not disappear you need to install the latest flash version)

Common Sense rates it
1
Seen the movie? Review it
1492_orig.jpg
Movie details
  • Studio: Paramount Pictures, Paramount Pictures
  • Directed By: Sam Weisman
  • Cast: Jon Lovitz, Mary McCormack, David Spade
  • Running Time: 99 minutes
  • Release Date: 09/05/2003
  • Video/DVD Release Date: 02/17/2004
  • Genre: Comedy
  • MPAA Rating: PG-13
  • MPAA Explanation: crude and sex-related humor, language and drug references

Parents need to know

Parents need to know that there's lots of stuff here that you won't want your tween seeing or repeating. This movie contains very strong language for a PG-13, including crude humor, alcohol and drug references, and a joke about Jesus that some people may find offensive.

Families can talk about some of their favorite child stars and what they would and would not like about being famous.

Message

Social Behavior:

Homophobic humor. Lots of crude humor.

Consumerism:

Drugs/Alcohol/Tobacco:

References to alcohol and drug abuse.

Violence

Accidents are played for laughs. Comic peril.

Sex

Leering sexual humor.

Language

Very strong and crude language for a PG-13.

Common Sense says

What's the story?

Reviewed by Nell Minow

Dickie Roberts was the son of an overbearing mother who pushed him to be the child star of a hugely successful TV show called The Glimmer Gang, complete with a precious tagline ("This is nucking futs!") that propelled him into stardom and had him washed up by the time he was seven. Fighting to get back in the business, he begs director Rob Reiner to cast him in a role that Sean Penn is competing for. When Reiner tells Dickie that he's unsuitable for the part because he has no idea of what it's like to have a normal childhood, Dickie puts an ad in the paper to find a family that will let him move into their house and live like a kid, as one character says, to "reboot him like a computer."

Is it any good?

1

DICKIE ROBERTS: FORMER CHILD STAR just isn't a very funny movie. At best, audiences who don't think too much will laugh once or twice then forget the whole thing before they reach the door of the theater. Of course the premise makes no sense, but then the way it's carried out doesn't make any sense either. It's just a string of listless skits. The movie feels haphazard and thrown together, with a bike-riding scene that ends up like a Jackass stunt and a disturbingly Oedipal "your mom's hot" running joke. Just to show how lazy this film is, when Dickie gets back on the scene, instead of writing something funny, they use old footage of David Spade on Jay Leno's show, on the cover of Rolling Stone, and performing with Aerosmith. Or maybe that was in hopes of reminding us that despite this movie, David Spade is actually a pretty cool guy.

There are a few moments that remind you how talented Spade is, particularly when he spouts off smart-aleck remarks, but they are more suitable for stand-up routines than for depiction on screen with other actors. His insults to some school bullies would be funnier if we didn't see him actually using that language to people who are, after all, children. The movie seems to applaud him not just for crudely insulting children, but also for making a fake 911 call and giving someone the finger. Episodes like giving a bath to a dead rabbit, applauding "Mom" for rudely telling off an imperious neighbor, the exchange of a kidney transplant for an audition, and hitting someone in the head with a champagne cork are sour and weird. Ultimately, though, the movie's lame humor is less painful than the supposedly touching material about how love is all that really matters.

Other choices

Back to School
Tommy Boy
Support Common Sense Media
Common Sense Media is a non-profit and will receive a portion of your purchase from Pricegrabber. Learn more.

Parents and kids say

All Reviews

There are 5 reviews.

5


Posted on 06/29/07 by Curbspaget Kid contributor, age 16
3


Posted on 07/08/06 by G3 Adult contributor

Great movie!

3


Posted on 04/21/06 by G Kid contributor, age 12

NOT A KIDS MOVIE!

If its not a kids movie why'd they advertise it on Nicalodeon and Cartoon Network!
1

Posted on 06/29/05 by Anonymous Kid contributor, age 13

Bad Movie

All of the humor in this movie not appropriate for children under 13 years old. The language is very strong, and the jokes are rude and are sex-related. Skip this movie.
2


Posted on 05/05/05 by kevin Kid contributor, age 9

Adult Reviews

There are 1 reviews.

3


Posted on 07/08/06 by G3 Adult contributor

Great movie!

Kids Reviews

There are 4 reviews.

5


Posted on 06/29/07 by Curbspaget Kid contributor, age 16
3


Posted on 04/21/06 by G Kid contributor, age 12

NOT A KIDS MOVIE!

If its not a kids movie why'd they advertise it on Nicalodeon and Cartoon Network!
1

Posted on 06/29/05 by Anonymous Kid contributor, age 13

Bad Movie

All of the humor in this movie not appropriate for children under 13 years old. The language is very strong, and the jokes are rude and are sex-related. Skip this movie.
2


Posted on 05/05/05 by kevin Kid contributor, age 9
Review It

Great Fantasy Books for Harry Potter Fans

Great Fantasy Books for Harry Potter Fans
Which fantasy book creature has the best name?
Fluffy (3-headed dog, Harry Potter)
50%
Mister Grin (giant crocodile, Peter and the Starcatchers)
0%
Vermicious Knid (shapeshifting monster, Charlie and the Great Glass Elevator)
0%
The Incredibly Deadly Viper (harmless snake, Series of Unfortunate Events)
0%
Bunnicula (vampire bunny, Bunnicula series)
50%
2 votes