Monster-In-Law (PG-13)

Predictable romantic comedy lacks kid appeal.

(Flash is loading. If this text does not disappear you need to install the latest flash version)

Common Sense rates it
2
Seen the movie? Review it
3126_orig.jpg
Movie details
  • Studio: New Line Cinema, New Line Cinema
  • Directed By: Robert Luketic
  • Cast: Jennifer Lopez, Jane Fonda
  • Running Time: 95 minutes
  • Release Date: 05/13/2005
  • Video/DVD Release Date: 08/30/2005
  • Genre: Comedy
  • MPAA Rating: PG-13
  • MPAA Explanation: sex references and language

Parents need to know

Parents need to know that this film includes some loud displays of drunkenness and physical violence, framed as comedy (including Jane Fonda slamming Jennifer Lopez's head onto a table). Though the tone is mostly light, the jokes become repetitive: Fonda and Lopez spar while vapid son/fiancé Michael Vartan stands by (or at one point actually disappears for a medical convention, being a doctor). Characters drink, smoke, and make snide remarks to and about one another.

Families can talk about the jealousy and silly fighting between the two primary women. Why do women (in movies) compete over a man's attention? How does the movie make their insecurities into jokes? How might the mother and son develop better communication?

Message

Social Behavior:

Catfighting women, not exactly innovative.

Consumerism:

Diva goes shopping.

Drugs/Alcohol/Tobacco:

Jokes made of diva's drinking and drug abuse.

Violence

Slapping.

Sex

Lovey-dovey couple.

Language

Some strong language.

Common Sense says

What's the story?

Reviewed by Cynthia Fuchs

Having survived a series of husbands and a grueling globe-trotting career, self-loving celebrity interviewer Viola Fields (Jane Fonda) finally makes it to the top only to be fired and replaced by a younger version of herself. She suffers a "breakdown," and is shipped off to a clinic to recuperate. On her return home, she learns that her doctor son Kevin (Michael Vartan) is going to "marry a temp," namely, sensible, Kewpie-doll-voiced, proud-of-her-booty Charlie (Jennifer Lopez). Though Viola schemes to win back her son's attention by abusing Charlie to the point that she's run away, the women are actually well-matched. Because Charlie is here playing the nice, non-diva J-Lo, she doesn't fight back until it's absolutely plain Viola's been deceiving everyone in order to Get Her Way.

Is it any good?

2
It’s clear that the women in MONSTER-IN-LAW are doomed to repeat their learned, bad behavior indefinitely. What's most disturbing about the movie is not the familiar formula, but the fact that classy Fonda is stooping to it. What's most interesting is the film's use of both "transgressive" women -- Fonda and Lopez -- as they form a continuum of ambition, success, and widely broadcast implosions and meltdowns.

But the film's liveliest element is Viola’s long-suffering assistant Ruby (Wanda Sykes), a wisecracking sidekick who speaks just enough truth to seem funny, but not enough to lose her job. The fact that she's black, surrounded, particularly at Viola's mansion, by literal and metaphorical whiteness, only underlines her welcome distinctiveness and her caricature-ish wisdom.

Support Common Sense Media
Common Sense Media is a non-profit and will receive a portion of your purchase from Pricegrabber. Learn more.

Parents and kids say

All Reviews

There are 12 reviews.

5


Posted on 10/05/07 by xToTheEndx Kid contributor, age 14
5


Posted on 08/07/06 by MikaylaLovesEdwardCullen Kid contributor, age 11

great movie, my whole family loved it.
4


Posted on 07/28/06 by HaloFreak123 Adult contributor

Funny

I'm not into romance at all, but this movie was very good. Not sappy or mushy. There is no sex, but there are some references. But this movie it ok for 13 and up.
4


Posted on 10/17/05 by kidreviewer Kid contributor, age 12

So funny

This is one of the funniest movie I have seen all year. Everyone I have talked to about this movie does not see what it is about it I find so funny, but I loved it. I saw it twice in the theaters, because I enjoyed it so much the first time through. True, if you are looking for a movie with a good message or something inspiring, this is not the best choice. If you are just looking to see a good, funny movie, this would be a good choice.
3


Posted on 09/14/05 by Christianmom9803 Adult contributor

not for small kids

it was funny, i cant remember any sexual content, there was some language and some drinking, recomended for kids 13+
3

Posted on 09/06/05 by Anonymous Adult contributor

so funny. but what was Jane thinking?

Love Jane fonda. And it made me giggle and even slap a thigh or two. A great time waster but you could do worse. dont bring your little ones. I did go with a 15 yr old girl who also laughed out loud at inappropriate humor. younger than that...i don't think so.
3


Posted on 09/04/05 by little_missy3 Kid contributor, age 17

Feel good movie

So it's your typical J-Lo movie, but honestly.. who doesn't need a feel good movie once in a while? It's a movie to watch if your looking for a thinker!
4


Posted on 09/04/05 by behemoth Kid contributor, age 12
4


Posted on 08/31/05 by moviefanatic411 Kid contributor, age 14
2


Posted on 06/08/05 by fatpenquins Kid contributor, age 14

pretty much what you would suspect

A chick-flick deffinetly but not a very good one. An Ok renter but don't waste money seeing it in theaters. Not for small children. 13 and up.

See all 12 reviews >

Adult Reviews

There are 5 reviews.

4


Posted on 07/28/06 by HaloFreak123 Adult contributor

Funny

I'm not into romance at all, but this movie was very good. Not sappy or mushy. There is no sex, but there are some references. But this movie it ok for 13 and up.
3


Posted on 09/14/05 by Christianmom9803 Adult contributor

not for small kids

it was funny, i cant remember any sexual content, there was some language and some drinking, recomended for kids 13+
3

Posted on 09/06/05 by Anonymous Adult contributor

so funny. but what was Jane thinking?

Love Jane fonda. And it made me giggle and even slap a thigh or two. A great time waster but you could do worse. dont bring your little ones. I did go with a 15 yr old girl who also laughed out loud at inappropriate humor. younger than that...i don't think so.
2

Posted on 05/19/05 by Anonymous Adult contributor

2

Posted on 05/19/05 by Anonymous Adult contributor

Kids Reviews

There are 7 reviews.

5


Posted on 10/05/07 by xToTheEndx Kid contributor, age 14
5


Posted on 08/07/06 by MikaylaLovesEdwardCullen Kid contributor, age 11

great movie, my whole family loved it.
4


Posted on 10/17/05 by kidreviewer Kid contributor, age 12

So funny

This is one of the funniest movie I have seen all year. Everyone I have talked to about this movie does not see what it is about it I find so funny, but I loved it. I saw it twice in the theaters, because I enjoyed it so much the first time through. True, if you are looking for a movie with a good message or something inspiring, this is not the best choice. If you are just looking to see a good, funny movie, this would be a good choice.
3


Posted on 09/04/05 by little_missy3 Kid contributor, age 17

Feel good movie

So it's your typical J-Lo movie, but honestly.. who doesn't need a feel good movie once in a while? It's a movie to watch if your looking for a thinker!
4


Posted on 09/04/05 by behemoth Kid contributor, age 12
4


Posted on 08/31/05 by moviefanatic411 Kid contributor, age 14
2


Posted on 06/08/05 by fatpenquins Kid contributor, age 14

pretty much what you would suspect

A chick-flick deffinetly but not a very good one. An Ok renter but don't waste money seeing it in theaters. Not for small children. 13 and up.
See all 7 kids reviews >
Review It
Who's your favorite TV holiday special character?
Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer
26%
The Grinch
34%
Frosty the Snowman
11%
Charlie Brown
18%
Shrek
10%
208 votes