Peter Pan (2003) (PG)

Live-action version keeps its thrill and charm.

(Flash is loading. If this text does not disappear you need to install the latest flash version)

Common Sense rates it
4
Seen the movie? Review it
1883_orig.jpg
Movie details
  • Studio: Universal Pictures, Universal Pictures
  • Directed By: P.J. Hogan
  • Cast: Jason Isaacs, Jeremy Sumpter, Rachel Hurd-Wood
  • Running Time: 100 minutes
  • Release Date: 12/25/2003
  • Video/DVD Release Date: 05/04/2004
  • Genre: Family and Kids
  • MPAA Rating: PG
  • MPAA Explanation: adventure action sequences and peril

Parents need to know

Parents need to know that this movie is OK for early tweens who aren't frightened by a brief but graphic image of Captain Hook's amputated arm as he puts on one of his hooks. The movie has a lot of fantasy violence, including swordfights, guns, and hitting below the belt. Pirates are killed. We see boys' bare behinds. There are a couple of sweet kisses and some subtle references to puberty. Characters drink and smoke and a pirate offers liquor and cigars to a child.

Families can talk about why someone might not want to grow up. What do grown-ups do to keep the best part of childhood inside themselves? Is that what Barrie was doing in writing this story?

Message

Social Behavior:

Consumerism:

Drugs/Alcohol/Tobacco:

Characters drink and smoke and a pirate offers liquor and cigars to a child.

Violence

A lot of fantasy violence, including swordfights, guns, and hitting below the belt. Pirates are killed. There is a brief graphic image of Captain Hook's amputated arm as he puts on one of his hooks.

Sex

We see boys' bare behinds. There are a couple of sweet kisses and some subtle references to puberty.

Language

Common Sense says

What's the story?

Reviewed by Nell Minow

This story begins with Peter Pan, the boy who would not grow up, leaving Neverland on occasion so he can listen to the stories that Wendy tells her brothers, Michael and John,. One night, Peter’s shadow is caught in the window. When he comes back to get it, Wendy sews it on, and Peter invites them back to Neverland. There they meet up with the Lost Boys, and battle Captain Hook (Jason Isaacs). This film version focuses on the relationship between Peter and Wendy. In Neverland, Peter tells Wendy she will never have to grow up but then makes her into the mother of the Lost Boys. She assures him (and herself) that they are only playing, but she feels the pull of the adult world. She even tells Peter that Captain Hook is "a man of feeling" while he is just a boy. Feelings are taken very seriously in this film. Fairies like Tinkerbell can have only one feeling at a time. Peter cannot answer when Wendy asks him what his feelings are. And Hook has a deadly poison made up of "a mixture of malice, jealous, and disappointment."

Is it any good?

4
Director/screenwriter P.J. Hogan’s sumptuously beautiful re-telling of the classic story maintains its timeless charm. The production design is simply gorgeous, with exquisite period detail. Even state-of-the-art special effects like flying and computer graphics are consistently conceived and gratifyingly believable. The jarring notes are Peter's (unforgivably) American accent and some anachronistic-sounding music. Ludivine Sagnier does her best as Tinkerbell, but the fairy is probably best portrayed as a spot of light.

Some Pan lovers will object to some gentle tweaking of the story. But it's not so much to be politically correct or bring it up to date as it is to remove any distractions from what in today's view would be seen as sexism.

Other choices

Support Common Sense Media
Common Sense Media is a non-profit and will receive a portion of your purchase from Pricegrabber. Learn more.

Parents and kids say

All Reviews

There are 15 reviews.

4

Posted on 01/04/09 by Anonymous Adult contributor
2

Posted on 12/15/08 by Anonymous Adult contributor

better for older kids

lots of tension & kissing by pre-teens.
4


Posted on 11/01/08 by bibliophile Kid contributor, age 16

Really Good...

This movie was very enjoyable, and I really enjoyed it. It's completely different from the Disney version, but much more accurate to the book. CAUTION: Capt. Hook says d-mnation, and you see two young boys' backsides hanging at the top of the screen. Also, there are two, very drawn-out kisses. Some sword fights, and so on.
5

Posted on 05/28/08 by Anonymous Adult contributor

Stunned by This Movie, Totally Enchanting

After watching this movie with my 9 year old son and 6 year old daughter we bought the original James Barrie novel, read it every night for a month and then missed it when we were done. We found the contemporary novel Peter and The Star Catchers by Dave Barry which is a "prequel" to the original and began reading that just so we could continue our love affair with Peter Pan. The movie is thrillingly acted by Jeremy Sumpter and Jason Issacs as Pan and Hook respectively. I have only known Peter Pan through Disney's eyes but after seeing P.J. Hogans version which so closely resembles the book, you understand how Barrie was a genius at understanding human Nature. Pan is the boy that never grows up yes. But did you every understand before that Hook is the rest of us? Waiting for death which ticks away around every corner, perhaps in the guise of a crocodile with a clock in its stomach? Brilliant! Don't deprive yourself or your children, you will love this movie! By the way, there are some very thrilling parts that might be a little intense for the under 9 set. But nothing disturbing or haunting.
5

Posted on 02/09/08 by Anonymous Kid contributor, age 14

Awesome movie!

Awesome movie! Great family film! Clean as a whistle! I love it!
5


Posted on 07/12/07 by jcsoblonde Kid contributor, age 16

it was good!

I have NO recollection of seeing bare behinds in this movie...but anyways, it was wonderful! One of my favorites...so beautifully done its magical! One thing that is SO funny though...is there is a pirate who is wearing SUNGLASSES. LOL!!! I thought that was hilarious! I wonder who was in charge of costumes sheesh...Capt. Hook was great, as was Peter. I wouldn't recommend it for younger kids though as it can get kind of scary and has a mature theme.
4


Posted on 11/15/06 by naner14 Kid contributor, age 17

Wonderful rendition

I liked this movie, and just about the only negative thing was the "tension" between Wendy and Peter Pan. They're only 12 or 13 for crying out loud. I don't think that this was in Barry's book. But other than that, it was pretty good. Worth watching.
5

Posted on 08/31/05 by Anonymous Adult contributor

2


Posted on 05/08/05 by kevin Kid contributor, age 9

i like the original better

TOO MUCH KISSING STUFF!
3


Posted on 02/24/05 by fritzsky Adult contributor

See all 15 reviews >

Adult Reviews

There are 7 reviews.

4

Posted on 01/04/09 by Anonymous Adult contributor
2

Posted on 12/15/08 by Anonymous Adult contributor

better for older kids

lots of tension & kissing by pre-teens.
5

Posted on 05/28/08 by Anonymous Adult contributor

Stunned by This Movie, Totally Enchanting

After watching this movie with my 9 year old son and 6 year old daughter we bought the original James Barrie novel, read it every night for a month and then missed it when we were done. We found the contemporary novel Peter and The Star Catchers by Dave Barry which is a "prequel" to the original and began reading that just so we could continue our love affair with Peter Pan. The movie is thrillingly acted by Jeremy Sumpter and Jason Issacs as Pan and Hook respectively. I have only known Peter Pan through Disney's eyes but after seeing P.J. Hogans version which so closely resembles the book, you understand how Barrie was a genius at understanding human Nature. Pan is the boy that never grows up yes. But did you every understand before that Hook is the rest of us? Waiting for death which ticks away around every corner, perhaps in the guise of a crocodile with a clock in its stomach? Brilliant! Don't deprive yourself or your children, you will love this movie! By the way, there are some very thrilling parts that might be a little intense for the under 9 set. But nothing disturbing or haunting.
5

Posted on 08/31/05 by Anonymous Adult contributor

3


Posted on 02/24/05 by fritzsky Adult contributor
3

Posted on 02/26/04 by Anonymous Adult contributor

Fanciful, but a little dark

I think I would have enjoyed this movie if my children had been older. I took a toddler and was sorry I did. This rendition is the closest to the original book I've found, and it is beautifully presented (I was really impressed with the caliber of the performances in the young actors)--but that also means it is darker than the Disneyfied version. The mermaids are scary, Hook is definitely disturbed, the crocodile is frightening, the castle is spooky--it was too much for my little one. <p>I would put this film in the same camp as the Harry Potter films--fun and magical, but eerie and scary in parts--really meant for kids 8-11 who can separate magic from reality and not worry that a crocodile is going to swallow them up at any moment once they leave the theater.
4

Posted on 01/23/04 by Anonymous Adult contributor

Sexualized version of old favorite

I liked this movie a lot but was not happy with the fact that my 5 year old was seeing it with me. This Peter Pan seemed more sexualized than the Disney version. In Disney, Pan wants Wendy to be his and the lost boys' mother and he seems oblivious to Wendy's romantic feelings for him. Here, he wants Wendy to be a mother and he a father to the lost boys. There are several very sexually-charged looks exchanged and a climactic kiss. Hook even acts a little suggestively to Wendy a few times (and the same actor plays her father). Like I said, I really liked it but I wish my son had been 7 or 8, at least. As for the violence, Hook shoots or guts several pirates and there is blood--I didn't consider it fantasy violence.
See all 7 adult reviews>

Kids Reviews

There are 8 reviews.

4


Posted on 11/01/08 by bibliophile Kid contributor, age 16

Really Good...

This movie was very enjoyable, and I really enjoyed it. It's completely different from the Disney version, but much more accurate to the book. CAUTION: Capt. Hook says d-mnation, and you see two young boys' backsides hanging at the top of the screen. Also, there are two, very drawn-out kisses. Some sword fights, and so on.
5

Posted on 02/09/08 by Anonymous Kid contributor, age 14

Awesome movie!

Awesome movie! Great family film! Clean as a whistle! I love it!
5


Posted on 07/12/07 by jcsoblonde Kid contributor, age 16

it was good!

I have NO recollection of seeing bare behinds in this movie...but anyways, it was wonderful! One of my favorites...so beautifully done its magical! One thing that is SO funny though...is there is a pirate who is wearing SUNGLASSES. LOL!!! I thought that was hilarious! I wonder who was in charge of costumes sheesh...Capt. Hook was great, as was Peter. I wouldn't recommend it for younger kids though as it can get kind of scary and has a mature theme.
4


Posted on 11/15/06 by naner14 Kid contributor, age 17

Wonderful rendition

I liked this movie, and just about the only negative thing was the "tension" between Wendy and Peter Pan. They're only 12 or 13 for crying out loud. I don't think that this was in Barry's book. But other than that, it was pretty good. Worth watching.
2


Posted on 05/08/05 by kevin Kid contributor, age 9

i like the original better

TOO MUCH KISSING STUFF!
4


Posted on 05/15/04 by ElmoRock3113 Kid contributor, age 14

Great!

This was a really fantastic film. I enjoyed seeing this movie with real people in it. I would recommend it to an 8+ age group because it has some kisses and violence, but otherwise really clean.
4


Posted on 05/14/04 by voiceofreason Kid contributor, age 17
4


Posted on 01/23/04 by ladybug! Kid contributor, age 11

A great remake, with a real boy to play Peter Pan!

Unlike other remakes of Peter Pan, this Peter Pan was really played by boy. The actors in Peter Pan were very good. The movie was so magical and one of those classic tales with new surprises. It was a very good movie and I would highly recommend it.
See all 8 kids reviews >
Review It
Who's your favorite TV holiday special character?
Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer
27%
The Grinch
34%
Frosty the Snowman
11%
Charlie Brown
18%
Shrek
10%
207 votes