Balls of Fury (PG-13, 2007)

common sense media says

Slapstick ping-pong comedy has very slight bounce.


parents & educators say

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that although this vapid slapstick comedy from the creators of Reno 911! will appeal to tweens and teens, its humor is tinged with a grim undercurrent: The main character is avenging his father's death at the hands of a murderous -- if seemingly ridiculous -- letch. There are also Chinese stereotypes (one character carries a lucky cricket and dispenses with enemies using chopsticks) and a fair bit of violence, mostly cartoonish and without blood. The movie clearly has its tongue firmly in cheek, which takes the edge off the crudest humor, but it's still sex-and-body-part based.

Positive messages: Characters, including Dayton's father, bet on ping-pong; Wong berates Daytona constantly; concubines offer themselves up for sex. Some jokes are based on Asian stereotypes; others are homophobic. But the main character, Randy, is a soft-hearted, genuine guy.
Violence: Includes gunplay, electrocution, murder by poison dart, and even a bomb going off. But it's largely played for laughs, and viewers don't see blood.
Sex: A couple kisses passionately, and she wraps her legs around him; in the scene in which male concubines are presented, one insists on spending the night; sounds of a couple having sex in another room. References to various characters' sexual preferences, though nothing really explicit is said. Plenty of scantily clad women. Men grope Maggie at the ping-pong training center, though she's able to fend them off with martial arts.
Language: Fairly mild: "ass," "bull-poop," "bitch," "hell," "snot," etc.
Consumerism: ESPN clips; mentions of the Olympics; references to Def Leppard and the band's hit songs.
Drinking, drugs, & smoking: Some drinking and smoking in gambling dens and bars.

More on Balls of Fury

What to talk about

Talk to your kids
Families can talk about the appeal of underdog stories. Why are films that depict a character's triumphant rise so compelling? In real life, do you think people are more interested in stories like that or in watching heroes crash and burn (the way young Randy fails at the Olympics)? What role does the media play in that process? Also, how does seeing sports on TV affect your perception of them? Do televised events overemphasize the drama, or are they merely mirroring what actually exist? Do you think ping-pong could be that hyper-competitive? What other sports looks calm when in fact they aren't?

What's the story?

What's the story?
In BALLS OF FURY , venerable actor Christopher Walken plays Feng, a millionaire ping-pong fanatic who gathers the world's best players in an ultimate death match -- literally -- just so he can watch them do what they do best. He's also a big-shot arms dealer, which may be why the feds -- headed by Agent Ernie Rodriquez (George Lopez) -- are after him. Enter Randy Daytona (Dan Fogler), a has-been ping-pong prodigy who once nearly medaled at the Olympics -- he's "the golden boy who couldn't even bronze" -- but lost to an outrageously aggressive German athlete, Karl Wolfschtagg (Thomas Lennon). The defeat left Randy's father, a gambler who owed money to Feng, dead by the arms dealer's hand. But instead of avenging his dad's death, Randy grows up to become a loser who does ping-pong tricks at dive bars where no one cares, or even knows, that they're in the presence of an athlete. Randy finally gets his chance to face down Feng when Rodriguez recruits him for the FBI's mission. But the former star is woefully out of practice, so he must first apprentice with Wong (James Hong), a blind Chinese restaurant owner who speaks in nonsensical clichés, and his alluring-but-tough niece, Maggie (Maggie Q) -- who both have major axes to grind with Feng, too.

Is it any good?

Is it any good?
 
Let's be clear: BALLS OF FURY is no Blades of Glory. Nor is it a Dodgeball: A True Underdog Story, Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby, or any of Judd Apatow's super-silly-yet-brilliant comedies -- though it clearly aspires to join those ranks.

Still, it's so good-naturedly inane that it manages not to offend. In fact, it may even make you laugh (a little). Credit for that first goes to Christopher Walken, who commits to the insanity with such relish that you can't help but let your guard down.

Walken's a delight, but it's Fogler who makes this whole enterprise somewhat worthwhile. He's boorish but likable, a Jack Black in the making. He floats through the absurdity with ease, able to battle an 8-year-old ping-pong master dubbed "the Dragon" without being over-the-top, even though the material is. (The movie was written by Reno 911! veterans Lennon and director Ben Garant, who, having found a way to make ping-pong seem as thrilling as it can be, should work for ESPN.)

Movie themes & details

Movie Details
Studio: Rogue Pictures
Director: Robert Ben Garant
Cast: Christopher Walken, Dan Fogler, George Lopez
Genre: Comedy
Run time: 90 minutes
Theatrical release: August 29, 2007
DVD release: December 18, 2007
MPAA Rating: PG-13
MPAA explanation: crude and sex-related humor, and for language.
Watch our review

This review was written by S. Jhoanna Robledo
 
 

Review It

 

Review Balls of Fury





Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.
 

What parents & educators say

17

Most useful reviews by all members

NickTwo
kid, 13 years old
 
Super Funny
This movie is super funny. See it soon.

milodog
teen, 14 years old
 
Something I wouldn't see again
There were scenes that I didn't understand, and the dart shooter wasn't my favorite picture. I thought it wasn't a very appropriate movie, and not something I'd recommend to a person my age.

 
It's Funny
Balls of Fury lives up to it's name. This is not a serious movie but it is enjoyable. It is a good example of the "geek does good" genre.

 
I like.
Movie good, have some problems. I still like though.

matthewr
teen, 15 years old
 

x495
teen, 16 years old
 
Crude, lowbrow, "Talladega Nights" wannabe.
Parents should know that "Balls of Fury" features crude sexual content. A wide variety of jokes are made about homosexuality, prostitution, gay sex slaves, tracking devices in one's anus, and more. There is some strong language and comic martial arts sequences and poison dart killings. Parent's who's children wish to see this film should be aware of the theme of killing people for sport in a casual way.

AmR
adult
 
Not all that bad...
Its funny. Some of the more mature jokes kids wont get anyway. Just a lot of innuendo. But hilarious :)

sugarbabyburnn
teen, 17 years old
 
inapropriate but hilarious
okay, this movie has a lot of sex related stuff in it, but that kind of stuff is hilarious! im not saying it is good, but it is funny. this movie wasnt all that bad so i recommend that you rent it! :D

Minas-Keddy ...
parent of 7 and 10 year old
 
should be TV-PG on Comedy Central "B*lls Of Fury" instead of Balls of Fire, but ok
What The Heck just Jason watching it in Fraih's House, Darn Him block Jason watching Balls of Fury. no kids

Diaryofawimpykid
kid, 13 years old
 
TERRIBLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Terrible movie

 
Not great, but still funny.
This movie isn't "Dodgeball" but clearly tries to be. Still it is funny and has a couple of scenes that will make you laugh out loud. Like "Dodgeball" there were a couple of scenes where I wish I could press the mute button for a few seconds. Be prepared to talk to your kids afterward about a couple of scenes. Probably better to rent this on and watch at home where you do have access to a mute button. :)

dan shall rate!
teen, 16 years old
 
FINALLY!
I love this movie. It is hilarious! I got it on DVD and I watch it over and over again. My mom is very protective, but she agreed to let me get it and it turned out my mom, my dad, and my sister, and I LOVED IT! It is a wonderful movie to watch with your family, except they should lay off all of the kissing and language.

mingdii
teen, 13 years old
 
great movie
funniest thing that i've seen in a while actually. has some sexual content throughout and also some violence and alchohol/cigarettes. pretty fricken good for a movie about ping pong. i think this movie is right for 9 year olds although the part where there is sex slaves is pretty rough.

ironboy
kid, 12 years old
 
Funny, but be cautioned
I loved it, but you people who are reading this should be cautioned. There is some language so like I told you be cautioned.

mb4
teen, 16 years old
 
DUMBEST MOVIE EVERRRRRR!
Super stupid strikes BAlls of Fury. I was sooo dissapointed when i saw it! I thought it was gonna be funny but it wasnt plus the acting sucked!

zackaback
teen, 17 years old
 

bubbleboy
teen, 15 years old
 
Is a FUNNY Comedy Too Much to Ask For?
I've been noticing a recurring pattern in recent popular comedies: THEY AREN'T FUNNY!!! This one merely recycles jokes from every other movie that you've ever seen, but think it's funny because ping-pong's so ridiculous. Hardy-har. The plot is so ludicrous that it's not even worth explaining, but let me just say that when Christopher Walken is a gay ping-pong master villain and GEORGE LOPEZ is a COP (!), things will not work out. They don't. That's not to say that the film's NEVER funny, just not nearly often enough. Content can get pretty iffy, but not much more than most tweens/teens can handle.

An independent voice for families
Age-appropriate reviews
 

vote now

Will you see Balls of Fury?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Great alternatives handpicked by our editors


About our rating system
ON: Content is appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child, some content may not be right for some kids
OFF: Not age appropriate for kids this age