The Bridge on the River Kwai (PG, 1957)

common sense media says

Epic of WWII honor and sacrifice gone haywire.


parents & educators say

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that students assigned to read the Pierre Boulle novel in school might try to watch this film instead. (Come on, it's a short book, no cheating!) That aside, there's ample wartime violence in this movie, with characters stabbed or shot to death, and the body count of the main characters is tragically high in the end. The now-taboo, once-common term "Japs" is used to refer to Japanese. Unrated on its original release, the restored version carries a PG.

Positive messages: There is nobility in most of the characters -- too much so, one can even argue, since it twists their loyalties and dedication, as Nicholson is so devoted to rigid ideals of military loyalty, discipline, and obedience he practically ends up working for his country's enemy. Another officer kills his own men rather than risk the likelihood of their being captured. The American soldier Shears, though a rogue and an impersonator, seems to be one protagonist who can see most clearly through the absurdity and the horror. It's mostly a male-oriented show, except for some Siamese girl freedom fighters on the margins. "Japs" is used to refer to Japanese, as it was in a derogatory way back then.
Violence: Soldiers are stabbed at close range (and shot to death, generally at long range), with explosions near the end and a high casualty list.
Sex: Some flirting with sarong-clad Siamese girls and western ladies in demure one-piece bathing suits. During a POW camp entertainment, men cross-dress as women (which was very routine in such circumstances).
Language: Not applicable.
Consumerism: None, though there is a book tie-in.
Drinking, drugs, & smoking: Social drinking, and soldierly smoking.

More on The Bridge on the River Kwai

What to talk about

Talk to your kids
Families can talk about the irony of the story, with upright military commanders working for the enemy to pull off a stupendous feat because of principles of "honor." What should have been done differently? Could it happen today? Which characters are the most (or least) admirable? Are there any real villains in the story? Would you say this is a pro-military movie or an anti-war one? Kids might want to research more historical facts, the real-life story of the Kwai bridge, and the Allied (and British) experience in the WWII jungles of the Far East.

What's the story?

What's the story?
The setting is Japan-occupied Siam (later Thailand) in 1943, after the Imperial Japanese Empire has conquered vast territories of Asia. Over a muddy jungle river called Kwai, a Japanese colonel, Saito (Sessue Hayakawa), must complete a railroad bridge vital to Japan's war effort. Into Saito's prison camp come captured British troops and their stalwart leader, Col. Nicholson (Alec Guinness). To Saito's confusion, Nicholson upholds British military traditions with his men, not at all taking defeat as a humiliation. Nicholson refuses to bow to Saito, and uses the bridge project to prove the superiority of the British and keep up the captives' morale. Meanwhile, escaped American soldier Shears (William Holden) is forced back to the Kwai compound to help advise a commando team assigned to destroy the bridge.

Is it any good?

Is it any good?
 
Winner of seven Academy Awards, including Best Picture, THE BRIDGE ON THE RIVER KWAI might be one of the finest war films of all time. Though based on a real-life WWII incident, the devastating story is really about what constitutes military duty and "honor" -- and how they can be twisted into disloyalty and dastardly treachery. While not explicitly bloody, there's a downbeat ending and a final one-word line of dialogue that sums up the whole thing: "Madness!"

There is an abundance of excitement (the last 20 minutes are excruciatingly tense), but well-acted minefields of issues and thoughtfulness are what make this a formidable arsenal. This is a war movie about ideas, not just blowing things up -- but in the end, both those attributes turn into the same thing, in an example of the usually noble concepts of battlefield chivalry and obedience taken to extremes.

Movie themes & details

Themes
Movie Details
Studio: Columbia Tristar
Director: David Lean
Cast: Alec Guinness, Jack Hawkins, Sessue Hayakawa, William Holden
Genre: Classic
Run time: 161 minutes
Theatrical release: December 18, 1957
DVD release: November 21, 2000
MPAA Rating: PG
MPAA explanation: mild war violence

This review was written by Charles Cassady Jr.
 
 

Review It

 

Review The Bridge on the River Kwai





Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.
 

Most useful reviews by all members

who3697cares
teen, 18 years old
 
Even if it has a lot of trouble saying whatever message it has about honor and doing your duty, it's not boring for a second, it's well-acted, and brilliant in parts. Alec deserved his Oscar.

BestPicture1996
teen, 16 years old
 
Epic and Honorable
This movie defines what it means to honor someone and how far that can go. It's very noble, and is not a war movie to be missed. Another thing I liked about it was that it's centerpoint wasn't strategizing things and blowing tanks up.

mongofa
teen, 17 years old
 
Teens will like it most
Alec Guinness and Bill Holden rock in this EPIC war drama. Score for David Lean! It is violent though, and there are scenes of torture, stabbings and shootings. I can't get the theme out of my head!

An independent voice for families
Age-appropriate reviews
 

vote now

Will you see The Bridge on the River Kwai?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

About our rating system
ON: Content is appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child, some content may not be right for some kids
OFF: Not age appropriate for kids this age