About our rating system
ON: Content is appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child, some content may not be right for some kids
OFF: Not age appropriate for kids this age

A safe community is important to us.
Please observe our guidelines.

All member reviews for Casino Royale (2006)

Joker15
teen, 18 years old
 
A great prequel to the Bond franchise
This movie is a great prquel/reboot to the Bond franchise. It's also one of the most violent Bond films since "License to Kill". I think nthat the nude torture scene where the villian whacks bond with a rope was not needed. It was the first time that they had Bond naked for torture, and also the most violent torture they've done so far. Another issue is that messes up his trademark "Sharken not Stirred" line in one scene where the bartender asks him "Shaken or Stirred?" and Bond says "Does it Look like I give a D*mn" The action sequences were great, and it was neat to see how Bond got his start. I also liked the cliffhanger ending which leads into "Quantum of Solace". Not for kids under 13. This movie is too violent and sexual for them. Iffy for 13, and great for 14 and up.

♥UndeadRainbows♥™
kid, 13 years old
 
Mature teens, I saw it with dad and am mature 11 yr. old!
I am a die-hard Bond Fan along with my dad, and we LOVED this movie! This is my favorite Bond so far, even better then Quantam. There are violent, disturbing scenes as with all Bond movies, and a very riveting scene. Action-packed and exciting this is a very good movie for mature bond-fans.

MasterMan 721
kid, 12 years old
 
The perfect action movie.
This a good movie. There is an amazing seen where Bond is trapped ina building that is falling down. There is a good amount of sexual behaivior.

redskull322
teen, 16 years old
 
Not a good bond movie
In terms of content, Casino Royale is a very mild PG-13 movie. Some moderate violence is shown, except for a very intense torture scene involving a club being whipped upon Bond's bare genitals (not visible, rather implied). As for a movie review, it quite frankly, is not a very good bond movie. Bond should be about gadgets, action, and sex, but this movie shows a darker side of Bond. Torture never existed in previous bond movies

Mr581
teen, 18 years old
 
Great but a disturbing torture scene
The torture scene made me scared

The BatFan
teen, 15 years old
 
See this before QOS
This is an awseome James Bond.It has cool stunts and class chase through Madagascar. Before you see Quantum Of Solace see this so you'l actually understand what's going on.

Katie-Kakes
teen, 17 years old
 
Okay for Tweens
Loved it, Loved it, Loved it. this was the first bond movie i ever saw and i am now literally hooked. the fight scenes are amazing and i just love the cars. this movie is a little violent but it was great. anyone over the age of 14 should be okay watching it.

yo diggy dog
kid, 12 years old
 
action
Great movie lots of action

apple boy
teen, 16 years old
 
there was a toture scene which wasnt pleasnt but it was short and the other content was mild

MRW2
kid, 8 years old
 

Mr.con
kid, 11 years old
 
Watch this
Very good film but contains quite a lot of violence. Not for anyone under 10.

HALO13
teen, 14 years old
 
OO7
I like Casino Royale because it has a cool gunbarrel sequence more violent then die anouther day good effects i like the end line the names Bond James Bond

tom the pom
teen, 14 years old
 
12+ would enjoy it 25+ would get it more.
i thought it was the best bond film because it wasnt as korny or unbelievable. i know people think the new bond attitude is bad, but its reality to get angry after deaths of friends ect.

Prototype79043
teen, 16 years old
 
Pretty Good

hagrid21
kid, 13 years old
 
New 007 Darker Than Originals
This James Bond movie is MUCH more violent and brutal than the films that precede it. There are bloody and intense fight scenes that little kids just don't need to see. In Casino Royale (the actual casino) Bond and the other player drink. Drinking is excessive (no drunks, though) in this film. There are some tender scenes and some sexual scenes. When Bond is tortured, they strip and whip his "private area." There is no nudity in that scene. If you find this movie inappropriate, try the earlier Bond films.

Conaill
kid, 11 years old
 
Good
This is a very good film. It's my favourite Bond film. Contains: Frequent, moderate action violence.

ConPC
kid, 11 years old
 
11+
This is my favourite Bond movie. It's violent and contains a scene of torture. Bond goes to bed with a woman and they're naked (you can't see anything apart from bare arms and legs). The word "b-----d" is used and so is the word "ass".

littleone522
parent of 12 year old
 
Best to wait till they're 13 to watch this one
Although the Bond movies aren't my thing, I proof-watched it to see if my son could watch it. One of the concerns that I had with this movie was the language. "Bast*rd" was used twice, "B*tch" was used at least once, "Christ" and "Hell" were also used.My other concern was with the sexual behaviors. In more then several occasions there are love scenes, no nudity is shown however you know the characters are naked because you see bare legs and backs. A women is seen kissing a mans bare chest. There was also a conversation that took place between Bond and his female co-star that concerned me. It went something like this "Even if you were just a mouth and a pinky finger, you'd be more of a man then any man I've ever known" said by female. Bond responds with "thats cause you know what I could do with my pinky finger" She replies "No actually I don't" He said "But I bet your dying to find out". There is also alot of violence in this movie, one scene contained Bond stripped of all his clothes and sitting in a chair being hit by another man with a rope that had a ball on the end of it. He would hit him in his lower regions and talk about hiting him in the place that defines him as a man. Alot of people getting shot and alot of fight scenes. If any of these are a concerned to parents, I recommend they make the child wait until they are at least 13 to watch this movie.

 
Not for Kids
Horrible for kids ages 8-

kayvan_922
teen, 16 years old